When studying, many people think that the working environment, conditions and life are more suitable for them and more free. Think that work is a broader lifestyle independent of reading.

Entering the society, I think reading is better, without the pressure of life, complicated interpersonal relationships and competition from society.

The above different standpoints have different effects because dialectics has not been really applied to life. The so-called dialectics of life is to analyze and deal with problems with dialectical opposition in life.

Reading prepares for employment, reading more makes people absorb more skills to face the society, and working makes what they have learned really apply.

The stability of reading and the pressure of work are the unity of opposites, and the occlusion of reading environment and the relative freedom and extensiveness of work are the unity of opposites. Reading and working. Every one has its dialectical pros and cons, so we should look at the problem in two.

Materialist dialectics points out:

Contradiction (that is, the unity of opposites) is the fundamental content of the universal connection of things. The so-called contradiction, in dialectics, refers to "the dialectical relationship of unity of opposites within things or between things"; Contradictory parties always "survive in comparison and develop in struggle". Engels thought: "The movement itself is contradictory."

Contradictions exist in the development process of everything; Contradictions run through the development of everything. In other words, contradictions are everywhere, all the time. Contradiction is the profound foundation for the existence of things and the internal basis for the development of things.