Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Master's thesis will not be submitted for review.
Master's thesis will not be submitted for review.
Blind evaluation refers to a system of organizing expert group evaluation, that is, anonymous submission, which means that the evaluation tutor does not know who the author of the paper is. Therefore, in Trust-Mart paper net's view, the problem of blindly passing the master's thesis is to return to the essence and improve the quality of your master's thesis. In some schools, more than 20% and less than 30% can be revised before replying, but in some schools, 20%-30% will directly postpone graduation for one year.

From the distribution of disciplines, the lowest pass rate of blind examination is engineering, which is 69.9%, followed by philosophy, which is 73.8%. The subjects below 80% are art, agriculture, education and law, reaching the average level. The highest pass rate is medicine, which is 97%, and the pass rate of economics and science is also relatively high.

The crux of the problem lies in the fact that the general review is conducted by the teachers in our own school. Because it is our own school and the tutors are familiar with it, it may be easier. The blind test is sent to other schools, and it will be judged by teachers from other schools (it may be a jury composed of teachers from several different schools), so don't bet on the probability, just be fully prepared.

Reasons for failure of blind test:

The first category is that the research topic is unclear, such as the research hypothesis is missing or unreasonable, the research object is unclear, the title of the paper is inappropriate, and the core concepts are vague.

The second category is the disorder of logical structure, such as the disorder of sequential logic and the disorder of hierarchical logic.

The third category is improper argumentation and analysis methods, such as improper argumentation methods, less argumentation materials, simple discussion and analysis, and anomie of literature review.

The fourth category is the generalization of false conclusions and suggestions, such as lack of evidence in research conclusions, imagination out of thin air, and uncoordinated suggestions and countermeasures.