We should take the critics' comments seriously. We should thoroughly read every question raised by reviewers, and seek help from teachers, friends, forum comrades and even professional paper editing companies in the face of incomprehensible problems. Only in this way can we correctly and reasonably reply to the evaluation opinions and write a reply.

2. Revise according to the reviewer's opinion.

If it is a technical problem, such as the unreasonable design of the test scheme, it is necessary to change the test scheme and make major rectification again; If it is a non-technical problem, such as language problem and grammatical expression problem, you only need to modify and optimize the language expression as required. If you have the conditions, you can find a professional paper polishing mechanism to polish. What is a core periodical? But the principle is to modify it according to the opinions of the reviewers.

3. Be sure to write back.

Because the editor-in-chief of the magazine mainly judges whether the author has seriously revised the article by reading this reply. The author needs to answer all the questions one by one and clearly point out where in the revised draft and what changes have been made. Generally speaking, the author should try his best to meet the requirements of reviewers without problems of principle.