1.** Re-examine the theme and examples of the paper * *: First of all, you need to carefully read the opinions of the reviewers and understand their specific criticisms of the paper and examples. Then, re-examine whether the examples you choose really meet the theme of the paper.

2.** Modify the example * *: If you find that the example in the text is really irrelevant to the theme, then you should consider replacing or modifying it. You can look for examples that are more in line with the theme of the paper to ensure that your argument is better supported.

3.** Enhance the relevance between the topic of the paper and the examples * *: If you think that the selected examples are related to the topic of the paper, you can try to explain this relevance more clearly in the paper. You can emphasize the connection between the topic and the examples by reorganizing the structure of the article and modifying the introduction and conclusion.

4.** Respond to the reviewer's comments * *: After revising the paper, you should explain what changes you have made in response to the reviewer's comments and how these changes enhance the relevance of the topic and examples of the paper. This will help the reviewers to understand your views and improvement measures.

5.** Seek further help * *: If you are still confused about the reviewers' opinions, or are not sure how to revise them, then you can consider asking your tutor, colleagues or professionals for help. They may give you more advice and guidance to help you better understand and solve problems.

In short, when critics criticize, you need to take them seriously and try to understand their views. Then, you can take the above measures to modify the paper, so as to enhance the relevance of the paper title and examples, and fully explain your modification measures when responding to the reviewers' opinions.