1, the material is inconsistent with the theme of the argument.
Materials must focus on the theme and serve to express and show the theme. However, some candidates think that the materials they are looking for are very good and vivid, and they are unwilling to remove them. As a result, some irrelevant materials were also written into the article, which affected the expression of the theme. For example, an article discusses the accounting system, but the result focuses on many problems of the enterprise system.
This argument is distorted.
Many candidates will look for information on the Internet when writing their papers, but the online quality is mixed, which requires candidates to identify the authenticity of each material themselves, and don't make mistakes in time, place names and names. Not to mention arrogance.
3. Lack of organization
Some candidates can't write according to the general idea of asking questions, analyzing problems and summing up problems. The whole paper looks disorganized and unintelligible.
4. outdated material selection
Some graduation theses, with old examples from the past, look like old faces and old accents, and the materials submitted are "old rotten millet". Without freshness and authenticity, the article is unconvincing. If there is an article about the reform of the old industrial base, the figures quoted are all from the last century, which is neither fresh nor convincing.
5, the words are not accurate
Some candidates have poor writing skills and don't pay attention to revision at the same time, so the words are very inaccurate. For example, it is ironic to use "July fire" as an idiom to describe the hot weather.
6. Use punctuation marks indiscriminately
Some candidates use punctuation indiscriminately, and there are many typos. These mistakes reflect that candidates' writing skills are not solid. As an undergraduate, you shouldn't make these basic mistakes.