Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Argument train of thought
Argument train of thought
Argumentative test sites include:

1, identifying the argumentative structure;

2. Divide the argumentative paper into paragraphs;

3. Elaborate the thinking of argumentative writing;

4. Summarize the main points of paragraphs and parts;

5. Identification and demonstration methods

Methods Acupressure fluid

1, grasp the language symbols that express structural ideas. Candidates should learn to grasp key words (symbols) and paragraphs, and accurately extract and summarize the answer information. Argumentative writing has distinctive stylistic features and standardized language expression, so it presents certain rules in expression. For example, open the question table below, which will be discussed in depth; "Qiao" is inheritance; "Say it again" to promote the table; The "truth" table turns to the opposite argument; "In short" summary; "Same" table analogy reasoning, etc.

2. Understand the general structure and thinking of argumentative writing. "Asking questions (putting forward arguments or topics)-analyzing problems (proving arguments)-solving problems (drawing conclusions or strengthening arguments)" is the general structure of argumentative writing. Candidates should pay attention to what arguments or topics are based on the author's analysis and comments on a certain issue or something, and show their views, positions, attitudes, opinions and opinions. The arguments are basically: true and reliable, fully typical; The basic requirement of argument is that reasoning must be logical.

When writing an argumentative essay, you should consider the argument, what to use as an argument to prove it, how to demonstrate it, and then draw a conclusion. It can be that we first put forward a general argument, then discuss and analyze each sub-argument, and finally draw a conclusion; You can also quote a story, a dialogue, or describe a scene first, and then analyze the facts layer by layer and draw new conclusions. This writing method is called total score, which is a common composition method for middle school students. You can also ask a question that everyone cares about at the beginning of the article, and then answer it one by one, step by step. This is a difficult writing method. It is also necessary for the author to deliberately compare two different things in the opposite way.

Argumentative writing is a style that uses logic, reasoning and proof to explain the author's position and viewpoint. This kind of article either puts forward some views and opinions from the front, or refutes other people's wrong views. Comments in newspapers, essays or feelings in daily life all belong to the category of argumentative writing.

Argumentative writing, also known as argumentative writing, is a style of analyzing things, discussing things, expressing opinions and putting forward opinions. By stating facts, reasoning and distinguishing between right and wrong, the author can determine whether his views are right or wrong, and establish or deny some views. Argumentative writing should have clear thinking, sufficient arguments, concise language, reasonable arguments and strict logic.

First, the three elements of argumentative writing

Argumentative writing mainly includes three elements: argument, argument and argumentation method. The parameters must be correct. Arguments are used to illustrate arguments and should be reliable and sufficient. Facts speak louder than words, which is the best argument. Arguments can also be accepted truths and philosophies that have been tested by practice. There are various methods of demonstration, and the commonly used methods are:

1. induction

Start with typical analysis, that is, analyze individual things, find out the similarities and differences of things, and then draw a conclusion.

2. Reasoning method

Starting from the general principle, explain and analyze individual things, and then draw a conclusion.

3. Inspection method

Compare all the facts and aspects, then analyze them and draw a conclusion.

4. Refutation method

First list the wrong views, then refute them one by one, and finally clarify your own views.

What way; How does the author demonstrate the argument from several aspects? The structure of the article is total score (total score, total score), hierarchy, or parallel comparison.