Whether the logic is clear or not is a watershed in learning and application, which runs through the whole application. For example, in summary questions, most candidates directly list the main points. If we can classify the main points according to the classification criteria such as subject, subjective and objective, and time sequence, then the answer is logical. If your writing is as complete as other students' scores, your score will be high.

For analytical questions, such as "Analyze the meaning of the word' population curse' according to material 8", the logical answer is to answer the questions in the order of definition, influence, cause and countermeasure, which is not clear and easy to miss the main points. However, the answer logic is only a direction we predict. How to organize the answers depends on the materials.

Second, language.

Small questions don't need to consider language, just use phrases and pause symbols to present score points; Fluency is enough for official documents and compositions. If you don't have any writing skills, there is no need to force yourself to recite some commentator's articles, because even if you recite a lot, you will use one or two sentences in the exam. If the content and logic are not good, the presentation effect will be bad.

Moreover, the good sentences recited are not used well and the effect is not good. For example, a passage in the composition "Make good use of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division, strengthen the ideological benchmark, reduce the blind spots of knowledge, follow the trend and try to get rid of shortcomings" looks tall, but in fact it doesn't say anything, it's empty, just trying to make up the number of words. It is suggested to collect some colloquial sentences at ordinary times.

Third, the roll surface is clear and tidy.

The marking of the application examination is manual marking, and there will inevitably be some subjectivity in the marking process. In my communication with other marking teachers, I found that everyone prefers a clear and tidy paper. The same paper, a clean and tidy paper may get 3-5 points more, so the skill of answering questions also includes a clean and tidy paper.

Fourth, the article countermeasures.

You can't just put forward countermeasures and list the items of countermeasures in the article. After all, a composition is an article, and you can't just list items like answering political questions. This can't be called an article, let alone a good article. Generally speaking, the article should make an in-depth analysis of the countermeasures involved. ?

What needs to be emphasized here is that the discussion of countermeasures must not be empty language such as "leaders attach importance to it", "raise awareness", "strengthen publicity" and "create atmosphere". Nor can we just write "further strengthen the construction of relevant mechanisms", "take effective measures" and "actively respond" and so on. Of course, such empty language can't achieve better results.

Verb (short for verb) The theme of the article.

In-depth analysis of the problem is an important part of the paper. Writing a composition, under normal circumstances, should raise the viewpoint to the height of Scientific Outlook on Development, the fundamental interests of the masses and social stability and harmony, and reflect the main theme of the times and China's basic policy propositions.