On July 15, the office of the Organizing Committee of the 34th Yunnan Youth Science and Technology Innovation Competition conducted an investigation on this pupil's thesis. It is considered that the author is a primary school student, and the professional level of his research report exceeds the author's cognitive level and writing ability, so it is impossible for the author to write the project report independently. Therefore, it was decided to cancel the first prize of the 34th Yunnan Youth Science and Technology Innovation Achievement Project (Primary School) and recover the medals and certificates.

So what is this child's research object? Let's have a look. It is a study on the role and mechanism of C 10orf67 in the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer. It looks profound, doesn't it? I can't even recite it. It is obviously inappropriate for a pupil to learn this. His father is a researcher in this field. Now I have come forward to apologize. It's obviously fraud.

Through detailed analysis, we immediately understood the story. First of all, this child's parents are both doctors engaged in related research. And he is a doctor studying in the United States. The child was born during their stay in America. According to American law, children born in the United States can become American citizens.

In the future, if a child applies to an American university, he can get 20 points if he has won such a scientific research award. It seems that the main purpose is here. The game is to score points later. The content of the competition is a subject for parents to learn. The file is very convenient. Obviously, people have a purpose to participate in the competition, and they are prepared with a clear purpose.

The child's father is a researcher and a university teacher. It is said that the teacher's character is not very good. There have been tainted papers published in the name of students, and there have been many similar opportunistic incidents. It's not hard to explain. Why does a child make a fuss when he wins a science and technology award? We didn't think of it, and neither did the father of the child.

I said to myself, I will give my child a reward in the dark and add one point later. How do many people know? If I don't know, I'll do it myself. The offended classmates and colleagues are still so obvious that they can't ferment online. After all, this kind of deception is a bit excessive. In this way, this shady thing, once fermented, will soon have a treatment result.

The father of the client apologized and the jury found out the problem. A simple evaluation, the level of children simply can not write such a profound paper. Therefore, there is something wrong with the child's prize, and so does the child's father. But we who eat melons want to ask, are the original judges and the experts who are judging now a group of people? They didn't doubt the child's level at first? If the current result is correct, should the original expert bear part of the responsibility?

Obviously, there must be something wrong with the original judges. I think since this matter should be handled, the former judge should be properly investigated. At the very least, they must have a certain relationship with the child's father. Otherwise, the problem that people who eat melons can see,