Part II: Analyze the concepts and define the main concepts of writing reasons. Why did you put forward this view? Analyze the cause (logic or theory).
The third part: how to do it and what should I pay attention to? The advantages and disadvantages of this view are discussed from two aspects. How to do this and what problems should be paid attention to?
The fourth part: summarize and popularize the full text viewpoint by shouting slogans: slogans, abbreviated. To sum up the whole article, you can end it with famous sayings or legal proverbs. But it must be used correctly to avoid self-defeating. You'd better give the article a title when you answer. A good topic will make the marking teacher directly clarify your point of view and increase a lot of impression points.
Use French as much as possible. This makes people feel that you are more professional and easier to get high marks.
Question 2: How to answer the essay questions of the postgraduate law course? 100 I don't study international law, but the answering skills of legal essay questions are generally like this. The main point of book knowledge is clearly answered, and it is discussed from the aspects of concept, content, function and significance. In addition, in order to shine, you should make full preparations in advance before the exam, carefully study the works of the main tutors in your major, understand the concerns and related viewpoints of the tutors, and synthesize the opinions of the tutors when answering questions (1. Personally, I think this is unnecessary and can be counted as an additional sub-item; 2. If the opinions of different tutors in the same major are very different, you'd better be cautious. This may step on points that do not appear in traditional textbooks, and it will also give teachers a better impression.
Question 3: How to answer the essay questions of the law postgraduate entrance examination? The experience of people who have experienced it is:
Answer short questions as essay questions.
The essay is written into a paper.
Short answer: Write all the main points under each article and then discuss the topic: Write all the things about this part in the assigned textbook.
Take your example above as an example.
1. What is the relationship between the Constitution and * * *
A: 1) Their respective concepts.
2) their respective characteristics
3) the relationship between them
4) the difference between the two (although only ask about the relationship, it is best to write the difference, which is the most basic)
5) summary (summarize in a few simple words. The impression on the examiner will be very neat)
On the perfection of China's unconstitutional review system
A: 1) What is the unconstitutional review system?
2) the background of the establishment of the unconstitutional review system (simple writing will reflect your depth)
3) The characteristics of China's unconstitutional review system.
4) Problems existing in China's unconstitutional review system (this must be written, because what is asked is perfection, and without problems, there is no need for perfection. So be sure to write down the existing problems)
5) Suggestions on improving the unconstitutional review system.
6) Summary (it is important to start well and finish well)
Every article should be listed by serial number, so that it looks neat and orderly. Pay attention to the time when you answer short questions. The score is not the biggest. Basically, if you list the key knowledge points, you will get a score. Try to have as many composition questions as possible. This is the time to examine your academic depth, and your tutor will also look at your level from here.
I found such a rule in the postgraduate entrance examination, which is very effective and for reference only. Everyone's method is different. Maybe your study method is better. Postgraduate entrance examination is a multi-faceted investigation. Although the process is hard, you will really learn a lot. As long as you stick to it, you will get something! Come on!
Question 4: the method of answering legal papers; Answering methods and theoretical reserves of composition in judicial examination in 2007.
Author: Anonymous Raiders Source: This site was originally updated on September 4, 2007 10: 26: 29.
First, the way to discuss the topic proposition
Discussion is a way to comprehensively examine the legal theory literacy of candidates. The propositional methods of discussion questions have the following forms:
1. Proposition writing style: such as "case, precedent, judicial interpretation"
2. Analyze the maxim law: "There are laws to follow/no customs to follow, no customs to follow."
3. Case/precedent analysis: "Yellow Disc Case"
Second, the requirements for answering essay questions
(A) formal elements: small paragraphs, multi-level, fine features.
1. paragraphs should be small, not segmented, and not too long.
2. Multi-level people require that the whole article should be broken and a paragraph should be hierarchical.
3. Fine features mean neat writing and neat handwriting.
(2) Content elements
1. Reason
2. well-founded
3. Multi-angle
Both sides should take it into consideration.
Third, the answer method
Step 1: Summarize the title and explain "What is it?" That is, what is the main problem and what is the main idea?
Step 2: Analyze the problem and explain "Why?" That is, why is there a problem with the stem of the problem? What is the reason?
Step 3: Summarize and explain "What should I do?" And point out how to do it by combining theory with practice.
Example 1 A murder case occurred in Shuangliu County, Sichuan Province. The murdered Wan Zhangan suffered from schizophrenia. He beat and scolded his mother and family from time to time, and also successively * * * his mother and sister-in-law. In addition, Zhang Wanan is not doing his duty in the village. Many girls in the village were molested by him on their way from school. He often beats and scolds people around him, which makes him restless. On August 24th, 2004, Wan Zhang 'an's mother and two brothers, Zhang Wancheng and Zhang Wanming, attempted to kill Wan Zhang 'an. At 9 o'clock that night, Zhang Wancheng and Zhang Wanming met their younger brothers in Taiping Town, Shuangliu County, and killed them with a pole and a wooden stick. Since then, three people have been arrested and detained. The procuratorate believes that if the defendant illegally deprives others of their lives, he should be investigated for criminal responsibility for intentional homicide according to law. After the incident, the local villagers learned the news of the trial and said that Zhang Wanan deserved to die! The villagers believe that Wan Zhang 'an's mother and two brothers killed him to kill the people and avenge everyone. The people in the village are very sympathetic to the three defendants and hope that the court can give a lighter sentence. Try to analyze the above events from the perspective of the value of law and its conflict.
Answer the main points
This case reflects the conflict between the order value and the freedom value of law.
B The most basic and core value of law lies in protecting citizens' personal freedom. But this protection must be equally applied to every citizen. The biggest reason for restricting personal freedom is that this kind of freedom endangers the equality and freedom of others. As Mill said: "In order to justify coercion, it must be intended to deter his behavior from causing harm to others. Anyone's behavior must be responsible to society only if it involves others. In the part that only involves himself, his independence is absolute in rights. For himself, for his own body and mind, the individual is the highest. " Although Zhang Wanan in this case is a mental patient, his freedom and rights should be protected by law, especially the most precious value-life freedom, which should not be arbitrarily deprived by anyone for any reason. There is no doubt about it. Wan Zhang 'an's mother-in-law, molesting women, beating and scolding the masses and disturbing the peaceful and harmonious rural order, is such an animal that people and gods are angry together. However, Zhang Wanan's behavior is caused by his mental illness, not normal free will.
C China's "People's Republic of China (PRC) Criminal Law" clearly stipulates: "The harmful consequences caused by a mental patient when he can't identify or control his behavior shall be signed and confirmed by legal procedures, and he shall not bear criminal responsibility. However, his family members or guardians shall be ordered to take strict care and medical treatment, and if necessary, medical treatment shall be compulsory by * *." The purpose of criminal law is very clear. In order to maintain social order, mental patients can only be strictly monitored and treated, and they cannot be deprived of their lives. No matter how bad Wan Zhangan's behavior is, he is just the behavior of a mental patient. His mother and brother, when dealing with the conflict between Wan Zhang 'an's personal freedom and social order, abandoned the strict supervision and treatment obligations entrusted to them by national laws as spiritual family members and guardians, and chose the law of everything, depriving Wan Zhang 'an of his life, which exceeded the necessary limit and violated ... >>
Question 5: How to use philosophical syllogism to answer legal argumentation questions, what is it, why and how?
Question 6: How to answer the essay question 10? Writing is actually putting all the knowledge out, and the basic subjective aspects, objective aspects, subject and object of crime should be clearly explained. Then, the specific situation should be combined with the actual situation into the crime constitution. If happiness is not clear, you can look at the answers to the composition questions you took in school over the years and do more exercises.
Question 7: By the way, which great god told me how to answer the essay questions in the law exam? Answer what? Thanks in advance. This question is too broad.
Generally speaking,
On similar ideological and political issues
Question 8: How to answer the noun explanation questions, short answer questions, analysis questions and essay questions in the freshman law exam? Hello, I am also a law major, one year older than you. Talk about your experience in doing the problem here, and you can have a look. Noun explanation does not need to recite the original text, just answer the concept points, usually long sentences. The short answer is similar to the subtitle of the textbook. When you see the topic, think about the aspects of answering questions, list these aspects in general on the test paper, and pay attention to comprehensiveness. Generally speaking, analysis questions are written by the total score method. First, make a simple analysis of the problem, which can be an explanation of the concepts in the problem, then analyze the rationality and irrationality of the proposition (there are two aspects in general analysis) and give a little reasoning. On the basis of short answers, the essay questions are slightly subtitled. If the topic is "analysis,,," you can answer it from what it is, why (meaning), how to do it, and so on. Finally, I wish you good results! !
Question 9: As the saying goes, "Men are afraid of getting into the wrong business and women are afraid of marrying the wrong husband". In my opinion, whether marriage and career are ideal has a great influence on both male and female compatriots, and generally speaking, whether career is ideal may be more important, because unsatisfactory work will also affect marital status. In an outdated industry, your hard work is far less than the salary of ordinary people in emerging industries. Don't listen to counselors who love education and say how good their professional prospects are. Listen to the views of seniors or graduating brothers and sisters in the same major, and their views will have real reference value. The reality is cruel and will wake many people up. It is certainly good for you to wake up early, so please inquire about your major direction and distribution as soon as possible.