Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Who's Fan Wei? Why is his deception worse than common folk science?
Who's Fan Wei? Why is his deception worse than common folk science?
Some time ago, the circle of friends was surprised to see an article that subverted the world. The name was amazing: "Heavy, China scientists found that the crime does not exist and will rewrite the textbook." It is extremely difficult to rewrite textbooks. Who are the scientists in China? What is no charge? I read it carefully, and found that this research refers to an article published on the pre-release platform of scientific papers of China Academy of Sciences: Study on the internal mechanism of charge, current, electric field and magnetic field. The number of clicks and downloads of the paper has reached many times.

According to the "heavy" article, this name? Scientists? Dr Fan Wei of Yunnan University, whose experiment was accepted by Brian, the Nobel Prize winner in physics. Professor Josephson reviewed the manuscript, and the paper has been published on the pre-release platform of scientific papers of China Academy of Sciences. But soon, clarification news came one after another: Yunnan University issued a statement saying that there was no such person; Professor Zhejiang University, whom I especially thank, said in the short message that he had no idea. The pre-release platform of scientific papers of Chinese Academy of Sciences was found to have no peer review mechanism, and the papers on the platform could only be published, but not published. Brian, the Nobel Prize winner mentioned by Fan Wei and a professor of theoretical condensed matter physics at Cambridge University? Brian D. Josephson sent an email asking about it and received a reply from the professor.

The reply given by the professor is the same as what I saw on the Internet before. I think Professor Josephson has been questioned many times. Soon, Professor Josephson sent it to the person who asked him about it. According to this email, the professor doesn't have all the information about it. Professor Josephson tolerated Fan Wei's behavior. In the professor's view, Fan Wei's statement did not point out that the professor agreed with him (about the absence of accusations), so the professor thought it was an over-interpretation by the media.

Later, it was clearly pointed out that in the initial media reports, Fan Wei claimed that he? The details of the experiment have been reviewed by Professor Josephson? At the same time, it will be about the media, Fan Wei may be with the initial voice? Youth media? Inform Professor Josephson of the relevant information and inform him of the source of the information. The professor replied to two emails in succession.

The professor didn't respond in his reply, did he? Fan Wei may be hyping himself? It seems that because he didn't realize it? An inexperienced reporter? It may be Fan Wei himself.

In a word, Fan Wei knows the art of speaking very well. Professor Zhejiang University was cheated before, and now Professor Josephson has been cheated. Fan Wei told Professor Josephson? Media? Out of context, causing trouble to the professor; While saying in the media that the paper passed the professor's review. So-called? Media? The headline number of the youth media, that is his own headline number. People's themes are not uncommon, but those who are so malicious and deceptive, so clever and so noisy are rare. As Professor Zhang Shuangnan, a researcher at the Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, said: There are many folk disciplines with this level, but there are not many folk disciplines that deceive people.