This should be a philosophical speculative composition in the argumentative essay of the college entrance examination.

This kind of composition usually takes two contradictory viewpoints that are not right or wrong as the topic. I suggest writing both viewpoints in this kind of article, but unlike the first two respondents, these two viewpoints are contradictory, so it is not suitable to be your central argument at the same time. Moreover, if we start from both sides, we will face the problem of insufficient length of each viewpoint. If you change the paper, it will be difficult for the teacher to get high marks when reading it.

Therefore, you should first make clear one of the viewpoints as your central argument, and write that out, and then you should criticize and make up for it with another viewpoint (because of the contradictory relationship). The purpose of criticism is to prove your central argument. Only in this way can we realize that both viewpoints of philosophical speculative composition have ink marks and clear and convincing ideas.

I know this question was asked a long time ago. Would it be better to ask the Lord not to object? ~(~￣▽￣)~