The quality of the thesis is directly related to graduation and subsequent employment. After graduation thesis writing, there is an important procedure-graduation thesis defense. If the defense may have some influence on graduation, here are the defense questions about graduation thesis I collected. Let's have a look!

Graduation thesis defense questions

1. Why did you choose this topic?

2. What is the significance and purpose of studying this topic?

3. How is the basic framework and structure of the full text arranged?

4. What is the logical relationship between the parts of the full text?

5. What different views have been found in the process of studying this topic? How do I know these different opinions? How to deal with it?

6. Although it is not mentioned in the paper, what other issues are closely related to it?

7. What other questions have not been clarified by yourself and not discussed in depth in the paper?

8. What is the main basis for making an argument when writing a paper?

Question and answer of tourism thesis defense

1. What research methods related to your major were adopted in your graduation thesis?

A: This paper is conducted in the form of academic papers, mainly by reading books, newspapers and websites, looking up a large number of relevant materials and systematically analyzing information.

And how to use economic principles and analytical methods to combine their own advantages.

Learn from advanced models and experiences at home and abroad.

The development of tourism in pingdu city is deeply explored and analyzed, and its successful experience is extracted.

Combined with the knowledge learned, put forward suggestions and methods for improvement.

2. What is the core concept in the paper? Summarize in your own words.

A: Tourism has become a new economic growth point in Pingdu, and its development speed is amazing. However, behind the rapid development of tourism in pingdu city, we need to see all kinds of shortcomings and constraints in the development process. Studying the ideas and countermeasures of pingdu city's tourism development can help us understand the future development direction and countermeasures of pingdu city's tourism industry, and help us give full play to pingdu city's comprehensive advantages and better develop the tourism industry.

3. Think negatively: What will happen if you don't do what you say?

A: It has hindered the scientific, healthy and sustainable development of tourism, thus slowing down the economic development in this region.

4. What is the relationship between the theoretical basis and the main framework of the paper? What is the main theoretical basis?

A: It provides a theoretical basis for the main framework of the paper. The theoretical concept of frame direct response theory, the main theoretical basis: the development law of modern tourism, the principle of regional tourism planning, and the economics of tertiary industry.

What do you think will happen after your research? What are the positive or negative effects?

A: First of all, I must explain the nature of my thesis positively. As a bachelor's thesis, I did complete the learning task with my heart, but if I put the framework and introduction of the thesis into practical use, it is still shallow and immature', and the result may become a theoretical success or a deficiency in practical application, but it also provides a meager supplement for related theoretical research.

Positive: through social investigation and data review and analysis of the status quo, put forward and solve problems in a targeted manner.

Negative: too theoretical, the practical application is open to question. The actual operation needs to be carried out step by step according to the actual situation of different places and different tourism industry points.

6. What is the research perspective of your thesis? Is it management, pedagogy, psychology or sociology? Social perspective

Collect social data and industrial data from the society.

7. Is the research object of this article an individual or a group? Is it a point study or a surface study?

8. Facing the big social industry is an individual study of the tourism industry, but at this point, it is a comprehensive study involving all aspects of the tourism industry, including its advantages and disadvantages.

9. Are the conclusions, suggestions or strategies in the paper feasible and operable?

A: Yes, although there are some shortcomings compared with expert research and guidance, the conclusions, suggestions and strategies drawn on the basis of data access and social research and on the basis of local actual conditions and efforts from all walks of life are feasible and operable.

10, are the subjects comparable?

A: Does the research framework conform to the paper specification (not the logic of writing a book)! The development trends of different industries are similar to some extent.

Teachers' questioning methods in thesis defense

1. Ask questions according to the principle of easy before difficult. Generally, the main defense teacher will ask each respondent three or more questions, and it is best to ask these questions in the order from easy to difficult. The first question asked should generally be considered as a question that students can answer and answer well. When students answer the first question well, they will relax their nervousness and enhance their confidence that they can answer well, which will help them to play their normal level in the defense of the next few questions. On the other hand, if you can't answer the first question, it will give students a psychological burden, aggravate their nervousness and produce panic, which will inevitably affect the defense of the following questions, so it is difficult to correctly test students' defense ability and academic level.

2. Ask questions step by step. In order to correctly test students' mastery of professional basic knowledge, it is sometimes necessary to divide a big question into several small questions and ask questions step by step. For example, there is a paper on "Science and technology are the primary productive forces", and the test level questions given by the examiners are composed of the following four small questions. (1) What is technology? (2) Is science and technology an independent factor of productivity? After the students gave the correct answer, they immediately asked the third little question: (3) Science and technology are not independent factors of productivity, so why is it said to be productivity? (4) How to understand that science and technology are the primary productive forces? Through such questions, according to the students' defense, the students' solid mastery of basic knowledge can be accurately measured. If you can't answer any of these four small questions, it means that the student has not mastered the basic professional knowledge well; If all four questions can be answered correctly, it shows that the student has a solid grasp of basic knowledge; If you can answer 2-3 of them, or you can answer a little of each small question, but the answers are incomplete or incorrect, it means that the student has mastered the basic knowledge in general. If you don't take this step-by-step way of asking questions, it will be difficult to accurately measure a student's mastery of professional basic knowledge. If the above question is the way to ask questions: please talk about why science and technology are the primary productive forces? Students may repeat the main content of the paper. It is difficult to know exactly whether students' mastery of basic knowledge is good, poor or average.

When the respondent's point of view is different from his own, we should discuss with him in a gentle way and in a discussion tone, that is, we should be "elders", practice our skills, and avoid condescending and insulting. Don't pretend to be the master of "truth" and easily use negative judgments such as "wrong", "wrong" and "fallacy". Remember the adage that "what is right is not necessarily right, and what is wrong may be right" and have a good opinion. If the author's point of view is reasonable and well founded, even if it is completely contrary to his own point of view, he should recognize it and be willing to accept it. If the author's views are immature and imperfect, they should be discussed in good faith and peacefully, giving students equal rights to defend or refute. When your point of view cannot be accepted by the author, you should not bully the weak, oppress the reason with power, and be rude. Although in the process of defense, the status of the defense teacher and the students is not equal (one is the examiner and the other is the examinee), but they are completely equal in personality. It is normal to show mutual respect and modesty in defense, and it is difficult to unify views for a while. You don't have to impose your own views on others, just take your own views out for the other party's reference. In fact, as long as the defense teacher speaks euphemistically and peacefully, it is easier for students to accept and consider your point of view, and it is easier to re-examine their own points of view, so as to achieve the goal of exploring the truth together.

4. When students can't answer questions for a while, heuristic and guided questioning methods should be adopted. Teachers who have participated in the thesis defense Committee may have encountered such a situation: students can't answer your questions, and some just "stay" helplessly; Some ramble with you and beat around the bush, but in fact he doesn't know the answer. In this case, the defense teacher can neither make the students embarrassed to "stay" nor let them talk to each other, but should enlighten or guide them in time. There are many reasons why students can't answer, some because the questions are completely unexpected, or because of a temporary "blind spot of perception". At this time, with a little guidance and inspiration, students can "recall" what they have learned and answer questions well. Only through inspiration and guidance can we judge that he really doesn't have this knowledge when he still can't answer and get to the point.

;