For example, Zhang Yimou, Chen Kaige and others, the fifth generation directors in China, whose works are well received internationally, let people all over the world know about China culture through their works, which is the cultural output.

However, the culture exported by China's films cannot "profoundly influence" the whole world.

Those countries that are relatively strong are still somewhat "curious" when watching our movies. For example, watching Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, their focus is more on the beauty of freehand brushwork in the East and the beauty of martial arts.

After reading "Wolf Warriors 2", I will feel that I am good at kung fu, but I am "nationalistic".

Just like watching Indian movies, we will be interested in their cultural differences, such as discrimination against women in India or lack of toilets.

In the final analysis, even if I agree with them, I still can't sleep, and I have the feeling that "city people look at country people".

In the final analysis, it is difficult for a weak country to export its own culture to a strong country, and a strong country can export its own culture to a weak country.

American movies advocate freedom, democracy, optimism and tolerance, so people who are influenced by American movies will think that these things are advanced and advanced, which is the future goal. This is the "far-reaching influence".

China is very powerful now, and it can influence many small countries. However, in the face of other world powers, although there is a "cultural output", it is far from a "profound impact."