In terms of periodic word of mouth, the evaluation of sensors is really not very good. According to JournalScore.com's data, the periodic score of the sensor has been at a low level for a long time, and the comprehensive score has not been significantly improved in recent years. In addition, the reviewers of the journal are tolerant and rarely reject papers, so it is considered as one of the journals that are easy to publish. However, this does not mean that the academic quality of the sensor itself is high or not recognized, but the overall evaluation of the journal is relatively poor.

As for the quality of papers, although the impact factors of journals themselves are relatively low, there are some high-quality papers published in sensor journals according to different research fields. In addition, many studies show that papers published in high-quality journals are more likely to be cited by peers and attract attention.

To sum up, although the evaluation of sensor journals is not very good, papers that meet the requirements of journals may still be accepted and published. If you have the need to publish a paper, I suggest that you carefully consider when choosing a periodical, and choose a suitable periodical according to your research field and needs.