1, deductive argument;

2. Inductive demonstration (example demonstration);

3. Comparative argumentation (analogical argumentation, comparative argumentation);

4. Metaphorical argument.

Difference:

1. Deductive argument is a method from general to individual. It deduces conclusions about individual situations from general principles, and the relationship between its premise and conclusions is necessary.

There are many forms of deduction, such as syllogism, hypothetical reasoning and selective reasoning, but the most important one is syllogism. Syllogism consists of three parts: major premise, minor premise and conclusion. Such as the major premise that all metals can conduct electricity, iron is the minor premise of metals, and iron can conduct electricity. ?

2. Inductive argument is an argument method from individual to general. It draws a general conclusion through many individual examples or arguments, and then summarizes their characteristics.

Induction can give examples before drawing a conclusion, or it can put forward a conclusion and prove it with examples. The former is what we usually call induction, and the latter is what we call example. Example method is an argument method to prove the argument with individual and typical concrete examples.

3. Comparative argument is an argument method from individual to individual. Usually divided into two categories: one is analogy and the other is comparison.

4. Metaphor argument is to use metaphor as an argument and analogy to demonstrate analogy (topic). In the figurative argument, the figurative person is a set of vivid examples, which contain certain relations and truths, while the figurative person is an abstract truth.

Although the figurative person and the figurative person are two different things, there is a general principle of * * * between them, so there is a reasoning relationship between them. Metaphorical argument is a way to demonstrate fables (topics) with fables as arguments.

Extended data:

Factual argumentation uses true, reliable and representative examples to prove the argument, specifically and forcefully prove the central argument, enhance the persuasiveness, interest and authority of the article, and make the article easy to understand.

Reasoning can enhance the persuasiveness or literary talent of the article and make the argument more powerful or attractive.

The contrast between right and wrong is clear and impressive, which makes the argument more powerful or attractive.

Metaphorical reasoning is easy to understand, vivid and easily accepted.

Baidu Encyclopedia-Overview