(A) the author's scientific research ability is insufficient
For academic graduate students, scientific research ability is an important indicator to measure the effect of graduate education, and the strength of scientific research ability reflected in dissertations as a concentrated expression of educational achievements can be used as an important factor to judge the quality of graduate education.
1, the author's lack of scientific research ability mainly includes:
(1) The article is beside the point.
That is to say, the discussion can't fit the topic well, or even digress.
② The concept is not clearly defined.
That is, the definition of core concepts or keywords in the paper is not clear, which leads to unclear discussion or research content.
(3) The exposition is not rigorous and sufficient, and the reasoning is not rigorous.
That is, the argument of the paper lacks rigor, the discussion is thin, and it is not fully discussed and explained according to the topic; There are logical defects or confusion, which leads to inconsistency or loopholes in the contents of the paper, which makes readers unable to accurately grasp the author's research ideas and process, and the reliability of the research conclusions will be questioned.
④ Lack of theoretical or research depth.
That is, during the discussion, the theoretical basis of the topic was not analyzed and introduced, and the theoretical basis was weak; The lack of theoretical framework makes the discussion appear chaotic; The research of this paper is not deep enough, there are no deep-seated research questions to explore and answer, and the theoretical depth is not deep enough and academic.
⑤ The research focus is not prominent.
That is to say, the paper does not highlight the research focus, lacks the problem consciousness, the research questions are not clear, and the views of the paper are not refined.
2. Lack of scientific research methods.