Without highlighting the historical and civilized connotation of human practical activities. Because of this? We don't agree to use dialectical materialism and historical materialism to describe and position Marxist philosophy? Nor do you agree to use practical materialism to describe and locate Marxist philosophy? The title and direction of Marxist philosophy is historical materialism. Key words? Historical materialism Marxist historical materialism is different from all previous historical theories in the method of observing social history. It recognizes that the subject of history is man? History is only the activity of people who pursue their own goals. But what historical materialism says is that man is not an abstract man in some fantasy isolation and loneliness? But a real living person in the process of development that can be observed through experience. Historical materialism thinks? People in reality are nothing more than the personification of certain social relations? All their nature and activities always depend on their material living conditions. Look at people and their activities only from the material living conditions that make people like this around them? Only on the basis of real history can we describe the real process of human development. The method of historical materialism to investigate problems clearly stipulates? Its research object is the general law of social development. Is it different from the specific social science that focuses on a local field and an individual aspect of social life? It focuses on the study of the general structure and development law of the whole society. The Development of Historical Materialism in Modern New Historiography: China as a Socialist Power? Stand still in the ever-changing international situation? With the great achievements that have attracted worldwide attention in the past 20 years of reform and opening up, the Long March in the new century has begun again. This scene is in stark contrast to the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the drastic changes in Eastern Europe at the end of the 20th century. They have both positive and negative aspects? Whether we can persist in and comprehensively and accurately apply the historical materialism is directly related to the success or failure of the socialist cause. So what? It's completely safe to say? The future of socialism in China? In a certain sense, it is closely related to whether we can correctly adhere to and scientifically apply historical materialism. Facing the new century? First of all, we need to scientifically summarize the history of historical materialism in China? In particular, we should establish a correct understanding of the experience and lessons of applying historical materialism in the 50 years since the founding of New China. A general empirical conclusion is? The victory of China's new-democratic revolution and the achievements of socialist revolution and construction? It is the result of China Marxists' correct persistence, application and development of Marxist historical materialism. And such mistakes as personal superstition, ignoring the decisive role of productive forces, blindly pursuing one or two majors, unilaterally denying market economy, and treating planned economy as the only economic system? In addition, the one-sided pursuit of absolute average will inevitably deviate from Marxist historical materialism, leading to a series of mistakes and mistakes such as egalitarianism and poverty generalization in the process of socialist construction.