A person, silent, does not necessarily have no achievements; A person who has no achievements does not necessarily mean that he has not tried; A beautiful person is not necessarily healthy; Health is not necessarily smart; Smart, not necessarily kind; Kindness may not really be affirmed.
When some people work hard silently and make unremitting efforts to spell out their own achievements, some people take the lead, steal the fruits of others' labor, and then publicize how they work hard to create. Such achievements are not your own, and will be taken away sooner or later.
A college student published articles frequently and became popular for a while. She was labeled as "a rising star, a talented woman" and countless flowers of honor poured in. Later, it was reported that many of this woman's articles were plagiarized, and some were even masterpieces. All the people began to criticize her and take back all the honorary titles, and all the major forums also issued statements that the student would never be allowed to enter the forum to make comments. This girl is spurned and looked down upon by all literary lovers.
This is self-inflicted! I want to get the success I want through shortcuts. Such success is temporary and is looked down upon. The girl lost her past achievements, lost the trust of others, and lost the opportunity to show her sunshine and wisdom forever.
However, those "predecessors" in the literary world, those literary lovers who give applause and flowers, why are girls' articles regarded as classics after they are named? Didn't anyone ask if it was plagiarism? Nobody asked if it was original. Some questioning voices are buried under the praise and aura, but what is really buried is those who are unknown, but their articles have been copied by famous and powerful people.
Proud as a peacock, showing off its beauty, but not knowing what to reveal? What did the public servants who shouted slogans to serve the people do? In today's society, fame and status make some people climb up at all costs, hoping to get what they want. But the height gained by stealing others' achievements often means that the higher you climb, the heavier you fall.
Open your eyes, how many unknown truths are hidden under the gorgeous appearance, and how many people's hearts are blinded by the fame and fortune of snails. As long as we all have the courage to grasp our own ideas and directions, our efforts will not be in vain and the truth of the matter will not be artificially distorted. The sky in our society will be clearer and more thorough, and there is nowhere to hide lies. We believe in this day!
On Schiller's "Aesthetic Illusion" Schiller's theory of "Aesthetic Illusion" comes directly from Kant. In section 53 of Critique of Judgment, Kant declared: "The art of poetry is playing with fallacies at will, not deceiving people, because it claims to be a simple game, although these games can also be understood and used in its works." (emphasis added) The "false phase" here is "Schein". Kant used the word "the art of poetry" to emphasize that "the art of poetry" is a free operation of imagination and it is utilitarian. So Kant added: "In the art of poetry, everything is honest and upright. By its own admission, it is a game that provides comfort with imagination. It wants to be in harmony with the law of understanding in form, and does not want to deceive and surround understanding through emotional description. " Although from these expressions, Schiller and Kant are very similar, as mentioned above, Schiller intentionally strengthened the realistic criticism of "aesthetic illusion" and opened up a new dimension of aesthetics. Kant certainly made a distinction between aesthetics and cognition, but he didn't deliberately look for "truth" different from the cognitive model of natural science for art. In Schiller's view, it is urgent to distinguish the "truth" of art from the "truth" of natural science. If the truth model of natural science is used to measure art, then the latter can easily be regarded as a pastime. Therefore, Schiller said: "We should prevent the rational pursuit of reality from developing to a narrow level, so that beautiful art is an illusion, and we should judge all beautiful illusion art contemptuously." But where can art and aesthetics get their own "essence" in the face of the hard reality of natural science? The traditional theory of "imitation" belongs to the truth model of epistemology and natural science, and it is impossible to separate artistic truth from scientific truth. Schiller boldly declared that "the essence of beautiful art is illusion", which seems to be a surrender to the truth model of natural science, but in fact it is tit for tat. Transforming the "illusion" into a single pure aesthetic concept makes the "truth" of art an "illusion", which is essentially different from the "truth" of natural science. This is a major breakthrough in the single aesthetic theory, because it completely liberates literature and art from the position of being attached to epistemology. Although the essence of art is "illusion", it does not mean that it is inferior to natural science. On the contrary, because of its "illusion" nature, it is upright, honest and free, and the degree of love for illusion directly represents the degree of freedom people get in reality. The "illusion" essence of art endows the artistic ideal with character, so that it will not be defiled by vulgar material reality. Therefore, the "illusion" essence of art does not dispel the value of art, but shows that it is more "useful" than all "useful" things, and it has a more serious and sacred mission. Schiller's thought of "imaginary kingdom" is also a creative display of Kant's aesthetics. Kant thinks: "The art of beauty is such a way of expression, and it is an end in itself. Although it has no purpose, it promotes the cultivation of inner ability in social communication." Kant believes that "sociality" is the aimless purpose and "function" of the art of beauty. Schiller established the essence of art as "aesthetic illusion" and conceived a kingdom of single illusion, aesthetics and games, that is, to open up a single field where people can communicate freely. "Illusion art" is "an intermediary form that goes deep into the sexual relationship between human subjects" and is a kind of communicative rationality. Only as an "illusion", art can truly have the characteristics of impartiality and public * * *, and can transcend the bondage of real materiality and finally play its communicative function. The "kingdom of illusion" is a single aesthetic identity, in which there is no material reality and no personal desire.
Look at the ground and push the ground, fight without potential, people are equal, can talk freely, individuals can represent races, and people are United through beauty. Kant regards "the art of beauty" as the art of genius, and Schiller's theory of "aesthetic illusion" is also based on genius. His so-called "dreamland kingdom" can't be realized in reality at least in the "present age", and he can only hope on the lofty mind of genius. Kant regards genius as a kind of "ability to provide rules for art", while Schiller regards genius as an ideal personality that transcends material reality and will not be destroyed by the passage of time. The kingdom of aesthetic illusion is the highest living state that human beings have reached after transcending the realistic pursuit, and it is the end of the highest stage of human civilization development. Only when a person has the most perfect human nature and becomes an "aesthetic person" can he completely ignore the existence of things, stay in the living image world and be satisfied with the happiness brought by simple images. The genius of art has completely surpassed the "needs" of the times and won the favor of the illusion kingdom, while the art of genius is a single pure illusion world. Undoubtedly, all theories of artistic genius exaggerate the creativity of artists and regard artists as "superman". Therefore, Adorno severely criticized Kant, Schiller and even Hegel's "view of genius" and pointed out that this view of genius was "in harmony with vulgar bourgeois consciousness".