It was just that those in power at that time who were backward in culture used it as a tool and spread it all over the world. This is what top scientists and the big names in the "evolution" court have long known. Darwin has never been recognized as a scientist. Sadly, the undeveloped cultural textbooks in China are still intact, and they persist in treating the inheritance of the ancient West as "science" to poison the next generation, and spend money to buy lies-"apes become human" to this day. Therefore, people in modern China never knew whether science was square or round. They just said, "I only believe in science!"
The article on page 122 of Darwin's Theory of Evolution: "Is it possible to form a new species just because of a small mutation of an individual? ..... It's hard to imagine that birds flying in the air just because of the slight variation of reptiles. In order to fly in the air, reptiles need many necessary changes: the forelimbs of reptiles should evolve into flying wings; The brain evolved to control wings; The bone is hollow inside, so you can lose weight. Just like a car, if you want to become an airplane, you have to make great changes from the appearance to the internal engine. It is hard for us to imagine that the above situation can be completed just because of the gradient. "
The article also admits that the last shortcoming of Darwin's theory of evolution lies in the contradiction between the fossils excavated so far and the animal textual research of the conclusions formed. So far, no intermediate fossils have been found in fossil research, which means there are still many unknown mysteries. ..... But so far, people haven't found a giraffe fossil with a middle neck. As long as we can't find the physical evidence in the middle of the evolution process, this mystery can't be completely solved, Darwin's "evolution theory" will be incomplete, and there will be objections and arguments. "
Reference news February 2009 18 edition 12 Reprinted in Spanish newspaper Le Monde February 10 Malcolm? Hones's article clearly tells people: "Darwin rarely wrote scientific papers, but the Origin of Species is worth reading as a literary work." The article clearly points out that Darwin and Lincoln are both epoch-making politicians. The article said: "Darwin read the economist Thomas? Two years later, Matthews' book about human plundering resources for survival established the theory of "natural selection". "
On the back cover of Evolution, the story of the law of the jungle is clearly mentioned: Evolution: The Story of the Law of the jungle skillfully links the law of biological struggle with human society, breaks through the limitations of evolutionary science, and integrates history, anthropology, archaeology, sociology and management.
On the cover of the Origin of Species, it is openly declared that social competition should consider the survival law of "natural selection, survival of the fittest".
In the third chapter "struggle for existence" of the Origin of Species, Darwin told people that the species of the same genus are more intense than those of different genera. In Russia, small Asian cockroaches expel large Asian cockroaches everywhere after entering the country; In Australia, small boneless local bees died out soon after being imported. It also tells people that in the great struggle for existence where creatures compete for food and shelter, the structure of one species defeating another is often hidden. Darwin also clearly told people that we really know very little about the relationship between living things. In other words, Darwin has clearly told people; He didn't write this book from a biological point of view at all.
Moreover, he also advocated that the so-called struggle for existence was a legal and unchangeable law of nature, and applied the prejudice and contradictory views of British society at that time to all aspects of nature. Therefore, the so-called "creature" he inherited can only see the cruel struggle of mammals, and there is no other side of biological harmony and cooperation. It only spread to the whole world through the "biological world", giving it a seemingly scientific appearance. This point is also calmly written on page 46 of Darwin's theory of evolution.
1860, Darwin wrote to his friend Asa Gray, a professor of botany at Harvard University, and said, "As for the theological views on this issue [the origin of human beings], I always feel painful and confused. I have no intention of writing articles to promote atheism. But I admit that after seeing the design of creation and the evidence of God's kindness around us, there seems to be too much suffering in this world ... On the other hand, if I want to regard this wonderful universe, especially human nature, as the result of brute force, I will not be reconciled anyway. I believe everything is done according to the designed rules, but the details ... listen to the so-called opportunities. But I think the whole problem is too profound for human intelligence to solve ... "
Obviously, it is a great blow to the real biological science, and the theological thought of moral concept and peace consciousness is naturally sworn enemies. Because it is not science at all, it completely changed the norms and direction of biological science, which was the need of the struggle situation of capitalism and colonialism at that time.
The 42-page article in Darwin's theory of evolution clearly points out that Malthus's theory gave Darwin the ideas he needed. Real scientists are practical and realistic, and have publicly and clearly attached an illustration of "Survival of the fittest" played by two people. Just like a young man with a flat head who pulls down his underwear to show you, you still insist on calling him "little girl". What else can you do to make you understand? This person really can't tell what is "science" and what is "philosophy of struggle"? Can't modern literature even distinguish between "magic" and "science"
Darwin was also outspoken in his autobiography. 1838+065438 10, he happened to read thomas robert malthus's cruel book "Essays on the Principles of Population", which influenced and inspired his views on evolution.
The influence of Malthusian theory on Darwin and Alfred, the founders of "Modern Evolution"? Wallace has an important influence. Darwin said in the book Origin of Species: "His theory is the application of Malthusian theory in a field without human intelligence intervention. Darwin was an admirer of Malthus all his life. " Call him a "great philosopher". Wallace called Malthus' works "... the most important book I have ever read" and said that it was "the most interesting coincidence" that he and Darwin independently developed "evolution theory" by studying Malthus' theory.
Malthus estimated that if it is not controlled, the population will increase rapidly. In his view, the main factors of population control are wars, famines, diseases and other disasters. In a word, according to this cruel statement, for the survival of some people, others must die.
Survival means "eternal war". Evolutionists generally believe that Malthus has made many contributions to evolution unintentionally. Malthus' thought on population is the basis of modern evolution. Malthus strengthened his observation of "struggle for existence" under the condition of "limited growth". Due to Malthusian theory, Darwin realized that the competition for survival occurred not only between species, but also within the same species.
Influenced by these thoughts, Darwin proposed that the strong and the fittest would win in the competition for survival.
Engels pointed out in Dialectics of Nature that the interaction between the dead and the dead in nature contains harmony and conflict. The interaction of living beings includes both conscious and unconscious struggles, as well as conscious and unconscious cooperation and harmony.
Why did such an obviously wrong hypothesis prevail in the universe at that time? There is only one explanation, and as a "science", his theory is hard to move. Because this theory of denying the existence of friendship and morality caters to the needs of many long-awaited struggle politics, the big bourgeoisie, imperialists, politicians and revolutionaries have found a "scientific" basis for their views and actions from Darwin's assumptions, and also found a way out for some people.
The fate of China is not much better than that of many countries ruled by imperialism and capitalism; At that time, the culture was backward, the generations were chaotic, and ordinary people were busy just to get three meals. Who would regard Darwin's "survival of the fittest" as "science"? If it was used by the "biological" scientific community, no one might pick it up today.
1840 After the Opium War, China gradually became a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society. Under the invasion of foreign capitalism and imperialism, the individual economy of farmers and craftsmen has been impacted, and a new national capitalist economy has emerged, resulting in the proletariat and the national bourgeoisie. However, the feudal comprador economy still dominates the society, and the people of China are under the double oppression of imperialism and feudalism. The contradiction between imperialism and the Chinese nation, feudalism and the masses of the people became the main contradiction in modern China society. "Where is China going?" has become a serious problem in the modern history of China.
In this semi-feudal and semi-colonial society, national crisis, cultural crisis, political crisis, social crisis and economic crisis broke out at the same time, and we sought our own development path under the influence and impact of the world. Desiring to find a new morality that can change the bondage of old morality has also become the most urgent problem in China.
/kloc-In the middle of the 9th century, Darwin's "natural selection" made the fittest survive, while struggle for existence's "evolution theory" was eliminated and entered China with western guns. It catered to a group of people of insight seeking to save the country and the people, gained a theoretical basis and found an ideological weapon to observe society and oppose feudal autocracy and foreign powers. Darwin's innovative morality has indeed produced a * * * sound.
In the 76-page article of Darwinism, Darwinism itself admits that it is "the necessity of the times"; With the emergence of capitalism and colonialism, "evolution" has become necessary. For capitalists who believe in capitalist free economy, "natural elimination", "survival of the fittest" and "competitive survival" are undoubtedly new weapons to fight against socialists who advocate the position of the weak and conservatives who don't like change. Darwin's "theory of evolution" provides a legitimate theoretical support for the exploitation of capitalist society and the rule of foreign powers over colonies.
On February 9, 2009, 65438+ reference news 12 reprinted Darwin's original letter, the first issue of British New Scientist Weekly, June165438+1October 23; Writing "On the Origin of Species" is like confessing a murder case;
New Scientist: Do you consider yourself an atheist?
Darwin: By the standards of denying the existence of God, I have never been an atheist. I think it is more appropriate to say that I am an agnostic.
New Scientist: What is the most obvious contradiction between religious belief and your theory?
Darwin: In my opinion, a person can be either a devout theist or an evolutionist.
Darwin: I'm sure that if our good friend Huxley attacked others less frequently and had a gentler attitude, his influence would be even greater, even though he was already very influential.
The moon was first won by superiority, and Darwin's own Britain was first won. Because they are the birthplace, they have the moon but know its details. Looking through the moon on the water is fake. So I calmed down, stopped idolizing Darwin and began to show my ass.
See "Documentary Literature-China-CIP Data Kernel of Contemporary Chinese Map Library (20 1 1),No. 168256, Truth of Life-Study on the True Life of the Universe, Scientific Demonstration Series" published by the author for details. What am I? "100 page";
At present, the intelligentsia of Tsinghua, Fudan and other institutions of higher learning have books for the intelligentsia to read. Director Lu Hanfu of Zhejiang Provincial People's Congress Standing Committee and Provincial People's Congress Law and Discipline Working Committee also wrote "What am I? Publish an inscription.