What do you think of these things? Please show your attitude, explain your views on the performance of a person or a group of people, ask for comprehensive content and significance of the materials, choose a good angle, determine the concept, and draw up your own topic.
Further reading
Three problems of men spitting in Shanghai subway need to be thought deeply.
The exposure of this incident originated from a video uploaded by an onlooker. In the video, the man is arrogant, overbearing and unrepentant. From beginning to end, he used "quick words" to insult and accuse his lady, and finally even pushed and accused the old man in the neighbor's house, which looked irritating. Finally, a "just man" really couldn't stand the man's arrogance and taught him a painful lesson through violent means. Looking at the whole process of the whole incident, the author thinks that there are three angles worth pondering.
One is the problem of tucao man. Spitting in public places is very uncivilized, not to mention the subway, a relatively closed and crowded means of transportation. So you should be ashamed of being accused by people around you and realize the serious problems in your behavior. However, the man abused the surrounding people and pushed the old man who accused him, which can be said to be a typical moral deficiency. No wonder some onlookers finally couldn't stand the man's attitude and fought.
The second is the problem of the batter. As a good citizen, it's normal for a person who doesn't like spitting to behave, and it's not too much to say that he is angry. But it is not the best way to solve the problem, which is tantamount to "fighting violence with violence." Although men's behavior was finally stopped, it also had a subtle influence on the people around them, that is, to solve this problem, violent means are needed to deal with it strictly. It can be said that the bad influence of "fighting violence with violence" is no less than what the man did.
The third is the question of onlookers. Why do you want to say that there is something wrong with the onlookers? Because most onlookers always condone men's behavior, and they don't blame or stop it, which leads men to have a psychology that "the more arrogant, the less people dare to provoke me". In addition, most onlookers "strongly" supported the result of the man's final beating, and even collectively accused a man who had stopped fighting and condoned the behavior of "fighting violence with violence" from the side.
The author believes that this man's subway spitting incident seems to only reflect the low moral quality of some citizens, but from a deeper level, it also exposes many "hidden" problems, and the influence of these problems is also very bad. Therefore, no matter the government, society or individuals, they should establish a positive orientation, that is, citizens should constantly improve their moral standards, solve problems in a standardized and proper way, and create a harmonious and friendly environment for our lives.
A just man will obey the rules.
When we encounter injustice in life, we always hope to have a hero who upholds justice, but in a society ruled by law, no one has the ability to enforce the law, and he must stick to the rules.
In fact, the so-called just people are those who abide by the system and rules. When we call for just people, we are actually calling for rules. No matter who you are, as long as you can stick to the rules, you are a just person.
Only by using rules to restrain inner impulses can we become an upright person. We always envy heroes in novels. They can start with swords and fall, but the result is that individuals replace the law. But is the hero's law enforcement completely correct? Sentence a person to death at will without legal procedures and sentencing analysis, which makes people pretend to be personal heroes and ignore the existence of the law. So it is not advisable for a strong man in black to kick someone who spits.
A man with a strong sense of justice can't do whatever he wants, and our hero, Zhan Zhao, will also kill criminals who haven't been convicted by mistake. Although this is great fun, it also makes people feel too arbitrary. If anyone thinks he is a hero, he can start with the sword, and this society will no longer fall into a mixed situation. Everyone is selfish, and even heroes can't be completely fair. Only under the premise of strictly abiding by the law can they get a fair judgment through sentencing trial, as Lin Qingxuan said, "The difference between a big man and a small man is only one centimeter and one millimeter from a macro perspective." In fact, the relationship between justice and evil is just a matter of thought. As the saying goes, the righteous can't fully uphold this degree when they think of hell.
There were many upright people in ancient China. They defended the people and killed them. Their intentions are good, and they have done many good things for the people. However, in a society ruled by law, no one can replace justice. Rules and laws are like the same reins, and the wild horses running in our hearts are strangled. Prevent us from falling into the abyss of accidents. Let's get back on track. The law clearly stipulates that excessive defense will pay a price. Anyone who walks in the society should stick to the law, and the rules are like benchmarks erected in the distance, pointing out the correct direction for us to walk. Only by obeying the rules can society have justice.
The river keeps running, causing stormy waves, but it has always been constrained by the dam. People are the same, let you and I hold high the banner of rules and move in the right direction, and we will certainly get a harmonious home.