20xx kindergarten education quality supervision and evaluation object is:

District third kindergarten, city first kindergarten, county kindergarten, county kindergarten.

Second, the purpose of evaluation

The supervision and evaluation of kindergarten education quality in the city is organized and led by the education supervision office of the municipal government. It is a diagnostic evaluation that monitors and evaluates the development of kindergarten education quality within its jurisdiction. Its purpose is to understand the present situation of kindergarten education quality development, find out the characteristics, shortcomings and problems of running the kindergarten, sum up the development experience, and provide the basis for kindergartens to formulate development plans, determine development paths and measures, and formulate pre-school education policies, management measures and methods for city and county governments and education administrative departments.

Third, the evaluation basis

The supervision and evaluation of kindergarten education quality in 20xx is based on the "Provincial Pre-school Education Quality Monitoring, Supervision and Evaluation Index System" (attached) formulated by the Education Supervision Office of the Municipal Government, the Municipal Education Bureau and the Municipal Education Science Research Institute, supplemented by the policies and document requirements on the development of pre-school education issued by governments at all levels and education administrative departments in recent years.

Fourth, the evaluation time

20xx kindergarten education quality supervision and evaluation time is from late May to mid-June.

Verb (abbreviation for verb) evaluation procedure

The supervision and evaluation of kindergarten education quality is divided into two stages: kindergarten preparation and supervision and evaluation.

Kindergarten preparation work

Kindergarten preparation is not only the process of data collection and activity preparation for kindergarten to accept supervision and evaluation, but also the diagnostic evaluation, self-summary and reflection before kindergarten accepts supervision and evaluation.

To accept the evaluation of kindergartens, it is necessary to establish an evaluation preparation working group composed of kindergarten directors and key teachers. At the same time, according to the needs, you can hire educational supervisors, educational administrators, experts, parents and the public to participate.

The preparatory work includes: learning the evaluation activity plan and evaluation index system; Material preparation-all kinds of materials needed for collection, sorting, binding and bagging; Personnel preparation-inform and convene teachers, children and parents who need to be observed and interviewed; Activity preparation-organize activities such as taking children to the park, teaching activities, game activities, eating and sleeping. , which needs to be evaluated; Self-evaluation and self-test-according to the "Index System for Monitoring, Supervision and Evaluation of Preschool Education Quality in the City", self-evaluation and scoring item by item; Writing a report on the development of education quality (summary report)-according to the evaluation index system, combined with self-evaluation and self-evaluation results, analyze and reflect on the current situation, and write a report on the development of education quality. The self-assessment results and quality development report shall be submitted to the assessment team one week before the assessment activities.

(2) Supervision and evaluation work

1. Assessment Panel

Establish an evaluation team composed of 5-7 education supervisors, education experts and key kindergarten teachers.

2. Evaluation activities

(1) Learning plan: Before the evaluation, participants should carefully study the Index System for Monitoring, Supervision and Evaluation of Preschool Education Quality, the Work Plan for Supervision and Evaluation of Kindergarten Education Quality in 20xx City, and the Record Form for Single Evaluation of Preschool Education Quality Testing, and be familiar with the evaluation contents and methods.

(2) Personal evaluation: each evaluator is responsible for the evaluation of 1-2 first-level indicators, and independently evaluates according to the Index System of Preschool Education Quality Monitoring, Supervision and Evaluation and the Personal Evaluation Record of Preschool Education Quality Testing, and the evaluator must score each third-level (C-level) indicator; At the same time, in the column of "evaluation record", the information (proof materials) consulted, the investigation of kindergarten construction and environment, the interviews with children, teachers and parents, and the life, play and study of children were recorded and recorded, including the quality development, characteristics, shortcomings and problems.

The evaluated kindergarten should provide a guide for each evaluator to assist in the evaluation. The evaluation time is from children entering the park to children leaving the park, and the teaching activities of the kindergarten are observed for one day.

(3) Kindergarten report: The evaluated kindergarten leaders make a summary report on the development of education quality, including the preparation for evaluation, the development status and characteristics of education quality, existing problems and deficiencies, self-evaluation results, efforts and improvement measures.

(4) Group evaluation: On the basis of the individual independent evaluation of the evaluators, the members of the group form a group evaluation result by collegiate discussion, and fill in the Statistical Table of Supervision and Evaluation Results of Kindergarten Education Quality in the City.

3. Evaluation method

(1) Listen to the report: Listen to the work report of kindergarten leaders and related personnel.

(2) Check the site: kindergarten environment, class environment, corner setting, dormitory environment, garden style, teaching facilities and equipment, etc.

(3) Access to information: access to relevant files, including various work plans and summaries, management and evaluation rules and regulations, teaching activity design, learning and meeting records, reports, kindergarten-based courses, children's growth records (cards, books), teachers' professional files, etc. , including text, images, pictures, etc.

(4) Symposium: hold a symposium for teachers and parents (10- 15 people, large, medium and small classes).

(5) Individual visits: individual visits to faculty, children, parents and related personnel.

(6) Class: Watch children's learning activities, games, free activities, outdoor activities, meals and bedtime activities.

4. Evaluation report

(1) quality report: supervise the evaluation team and write a report on the development of education quality according to the evaluation results, including the evaluation work, the present situation and characteristics of the development of education quality, existing problems and deficiencies, evaluation results, efforts and suggestions for improvement measures.

According to the education quality development report of the assessed object, the Record Form of Individual Evaluation of Kindergarten Education Quality in City submitted by the evaluation team, the Statistical Table of Evaluation Results of the Municipal Preschool Education Quality Supervision and Evaluation Team, and the original data and information collected in the evaluation process, the test team sorted out, analyzed and put forward the main achievements and existing problems, and formed a standardized quality monitoring and evaluation report (text). The main contents of the education quality assessment report include: assessment overview, main achievements, existing problems, suggestions and suggestions for improvement. At the same time, it provides a supervision and evaluation scale for pre-school education quality monitoring.

(2) Application of results: The evaluation results are only used as a reference for kindergartens to improve themselves, educational supervision, educational administration and educational scientific research departments to formulate and improve management measures and methods, and not as a basis for kindergartens or kindergarten leaders to evaluate, meet standards and promote; The evaluation result (report) is not released to the public, but only released (delivered) to the education department, business guidance department and evaluation object (kindergarten) of the evaluated kindergarten.

The second evaluation scheme of kindergarten education and teaching quality is to thoroughly implement the spirit of "Guiding Outline of Kindergarten Education" and "Guide to Learning and Development for Children Aged 3 ~ 6", actively promote the gamification construction of kindergarten curriculum, and comprehensively improve the outdoor sports ability of children. Now, we are notified of the series of activities to "improve the outdoor sports quality of kindergartens in the whole city".

I. Time and object of activities

1. Activity time: 20xx 10 to 20xx 10. The specific time and place of each activity will be announced separately.

2. Participants: kindergartens of all levels and types in the city.

Second, the content of the activity

(A) learning to improve

Outdoor sports activities are an important organizational form of kindergarten sports activities. It is an activity form in which teachers make full use of the outdoor environment of kindergartens, put in rich activity materials according to local conditions, and let children play freely in a good outdoor environment, develop basic movements and improve their sports ability. Under the background of curriculum gamification, kindergartens need to optimize and adjust the outdoor activity environment in a timely and dynamic way, actively create a materialized environment and a spiritual environment to support children's learning and development, and ensure their all-round development. In order to further clarify the goal and operation path, the city will invite experts in preschool education inside and outside the province to give a special report on the theme of "improving the quality of outdoor sports activities in kindergartens" and train all teachers in the city to help them update their concepts and raise their awareness.

(b) Practical communication

1. Kindergarten practice

Around the evaluation requirements of outdoor sports activities, kindergartens in the city actively explore and practice according to local conditions to comprehensively improve the quality of outdoor sports activities in kindergartens.

2. Salon seminar

The first is online discussion. All regions carry out exchanges and discussions around the practice of outdoor sports activities in kindergartens in their own regions, and carry out inter-regional network discussions to promote experience and enjoyment.

The second is the live salon. Around the theme of "improving the quality of outdoor sports activities in kindergartens", various localities organized on-site observation and experience sharing activities to promote the gamification construction of kindergarten courses in the interaction of parks and improve the gamification level.

(3) Identification and display

The appraisal activities focus on outdoor sports environment and organization and implementation, and the specific activities are planned to be held in March of 20xx.

The evaluation of outdoor sports activities in kindergartens focuses on whether kindergartens are based on the existing conditions, follow the principles of naturalness, fun, challenge and diversity, comprehensively consider various educational elements, create an open outdoor space according to local conditions, provide rich activity materials, implement appropriate observation and guidance, and make sports activities really play a role in the happy development of children.

Third, the form of activities.

1. Each park can voluntarily declare its participation according to its own advantages and characteristics. Use information technology to show communication, and the time should be controlled within 10 minute.

2. The kindergarten that won the first prize provides on-site observation and experience sharing, and accepts the visit and study of kindergartens at all levels in the city.

Fourth, quota allocation and award setting.

1. Allocation of places: Liyang, Jintan, Xinbei, Tianning and Paris, 3 each, and Wujin, 4 municipal parks 1.

2. Award setting: each group has 6 first prizes; 6 second prizes; Eight third prizes.

Kindergarten education teaching quality evaluation scheme 3 In order to further improve the teaching quality of our school, enhance the vitality of running a school, create a civilized and healthy environment for students, be responsible for students, parents and society, truly mobilize the enthusiasm of teachers, and make every teacher get an objective and fair evaluation, the following evaluation scheme is formulated:

I. Assessment content (full mark 100)

Professional ethics (10), teaching (50), teaching and scientific research (25), three-dimensional evaluation (10), education and teaching management (5).

Second, the evaluation rules

1. professional ethics (10 score)

Conscientious, conscientious, open-minded, rigorous in academic research, a teacher by example; Love education, love school, and be able to do their job actively; Caring for students, harmonious relationship between teachers and students, good feedback from superior leaders, society and parents, understanding and understanding the difficulties of leaders; When something happens, you can proceed from the overall situation, care about the school and unite with comrades. (Full marks)

Deductions will be made in the following cases:

(1) All staff members are absent 1 time, and 1 minute will be deducted;

(2) Irresponsible work leads to adverse consequences, and 2 points will be deducted each time;

(3) corporal punishment or corporal punishment of students in disguised form, 2 points each time;

(4) Gambling and fighting, doing things that damage the image of model workers and affect the reputation of the school, will be deducted 10 at one time;

(five) deliberately avoiding the important work of teaching, invigilation and enrollment arranged by the school without justifiable reasons. 3 points each time;

2. Teaching (50 points)

(1) workload 15.

① Subject coefficient: Chinese, mathematics, English and professional theory are calculated by 1.3 for each class, and the rest subjects are calculated by 1;

② Weekly class base: 4 classes at the deputy school level, 6 classes at the middle level, 8 classes at the middle level, section chief clerk 10 class, and other teachers 12 class.

(3) Full class base, full workload 10, and full workload is calculated due to school reasons; Due to personal reasons of teachers (except for school consent), points will be deducted according to the proportion of workload. If it exceeds the class base 1, add 0.5 points. The total score of this item shall not exceed 20 points.

(2) 5 points for preparing lessons

According to the actual teaching progress, determine the number of lesson plans that need to be prepared, and deduct 0.5 points for each less lesson. Teachers should prepare lessons before class according to the requirements, teaching materials and students' reality, with clear goals and outstanding difficulties, focusing on guiding learning and cultivating and training students' abilities. If you don't prepare lessons according to the regulations, supplementary lesson plans after class are regarded as no lesson plans. Every time there is no lesson plan in class, 0.5 points will be deducted until this item is deducted.

(3)/kloc-Class begins at 0/5.

Classroom teaching can strictly implement the teaching progress, pay attention to the cultivation and training of ability, pay attention to the use of multimedia teaching methods, have flexible teaching methods, complete the teaching objectives, and score 65,438+05 according to the requirements of curriculum standards and syllabus, combined with the characteristics of the curriculum, and according to the teaching materials and students' reality. Not according to the provisions of the teaching, each found a deduction of 0.5 points, the deduction so far.

If teachers are found to be absent from class without reason, 2 points will be deducted at a time, and those who are late or leave early will be deducted 1 point at a time until the deduction is over.

(4) Deduct 5 points for homework marking.

Determine the number of homework to be done according to the actual class time, fill in the homework correction records carefully and truthfully, and those who complete the quality and quantity will get full marks; Deduct 0.2 points each time until the deduction is over.

(5) Teaching achievement evaluation 15.

Those who take the examination subjects will be included in the total evaluation score according to the proportion of 15% of the average scores of teachers in various subjects provided by professional departments (if the average score of Chinese teaching performance of teacher A in one semester is 90 points, the evaluation of the teacher's teaching performance is 90 × 15% = 13.5). If Teacher B gets an average score of 80 for four times, the evaluation of teaching achievement is 80×15% =12); The training course is graded according to the cumulative teaching achievements of the relevant assessment schemes of the Training Office, and the quality evaluation grade score (15, 1 1, 7, 3, 0); The examination subjects are calculated as 10%, and the quality evaluation grade score is (10,6,6).

(6) Examination work (5 points)

Be able to organize the examination in strict accordance with the "separation of teaching and examination scheme", obey the arrangement of composing papers, invigilating and marking papers, the class teacher carefully arranges the examination room and urges students to hand in the examination summary in time, and get 5 points. Deduct points in the following cases:

Deduct 1 minute for late submission, and deduct 5 points for non-submission; If the invigilator is late or leaves early, it will be deducted 1 point; if the patrol personnel find cheating in the examination room, it will be deducted 5 points; if the invigilator does not participate in invigilation or mark the papers for no reason, it will be deducted 5 points; if the examination room is not arranged properly and the students are not urged to hand in the examination summary, it will be deducted 1 point.

3. Teaching and research (25 points)

(1) 4 points attendance and evaluation

There are four grades: A(3.5-4 points); B(2.5-3.4 points); C( 1.5-2.6) D(0- 1.4)

Attend more than 20 lectures each semester, with records of lectures, which is practical and instructive. Attend lectures for more than 15 times, with detailed attendance records. Seriously participate in class evaluation activities and record B; The number of lectures reached more than 10, with records and no absence in class evaluation activities. The number of lectures is less than 10, there is no record, and the class evaluation activities are often absent.

(2) Continue to learn 2 points.

Can actively participate in all kinds of training organized by the state, province, city, county and school, can actively improve personal professional quality and get full marks. Negative work, can not take the initiative to ask the progressors to deduct points as appropriate.

(3) Teaching and research papers and topics account for 5 points.

According to the award-winning certificate and the conclusion certificate. Since taking office, the teaching and research papers selected or authorized by the education authorities have won the provincial first, second and third prizes of 5, 4 and 3 points respectively; The first, second and third prizes at the municipal level are 4, 3 and 2 points respectively; The first prize and the second prize at the county level are 3 points and 2 points respectively. At the end of the project, the scores of provincial, municipal, county and university-level hosts were 4, 3, 2 and 1 respectively, and the participation was 2.5, 2, 1 and 0.5 respectively. Papers published in national, provincial and municipal journals scored 5, 4 and 3 respectively, supplements, albums and essays, articles published in internal journals sponsored by education administrative departments at or above the municipal level, review materials, counseling materials, examination questions and other publications, and papers published in journals not approved by the General Administration of Press and Publication shall not be used as materials for declaration and evaluation. Published papers should be accompanied by a copy of the legal certificate of the publication. If the total score exceeds 5 points, get 5 points.

(4) Participate in basic skills competitions at all levels, with 5 points for open courses, demonstration courses, excellent courses and lectures at all levels.

Based on the relevant documents, certificates and certificates of the school functional departments. Since taking office, he has won the first, second and third prizes at the provincial level of 5, 4 and 3 points respectively, the first, second and third prizes at the municipal level of 4, 3 and 2 points respectively, the first, second and third prizes at the county level of 3, 2 and 1 point respectively, and the first and second prizes at the school level of 2 and 1 point respectively. Open classes, demonstration classes, high-quality classes and lectures are offered. The scores of provinces, cities and counties are 5, 4 and 3 respectively, and the scores of schools are 1 respectively. The results of open classes, demonstration classes, high-quality classes and lectures are not cumulative. If the total score exceeds 5 points, get 5 points.

(5) I or tutoring students to participate in the professional skills (or teacher business) competition organized by the education authorities, accounting for 5 points.

Based on the award certificate. I got 5, 4 and 3 points for the first, second and third prizes in the province, and 4, 3 and 2 points for the first, second and third prizes in the city. Tutoring students to participate in skill competition will get 1 point. The first, second and third prizes at the provincial level are added with 4, 3 and 2 points respectively, and the first, second and third prizes at the municipal level are added with 3, 2 and 1 point respectively. Where there are many tutors, they will be added to the tutors in the form of average points according to the number of tutors. The total score of this item shall not exceed 10.

(6) Tutoring students to participate in various competitions at all levels (excluding skill competitions) or publishing works accounted for 4 points.

Based on the award certificate. Counseling students to participate in provincial and municipal competitions or publish works since taking office, and each person who won the first prize will be given 4 or 3 points; Second prize plus 3 points, 2 points each; The third prize will be added with 2 points and 1 point respectively. The total score of this item shall not exceed 10.

4. Stereoscopic evaluation (10 score)

Comprehensive three-dimensional evaluation of teaching is carried out from three aspects: students' evaluation of teaching, teachers' mutual evaluation and school administration (leadership) evaluation of teaching (weight: 6:3:3). The evaluation is based on the contents of three "teaching situation questionnaires" in the teaching management regulations formulated by our school. Every semester, the Academic Affairs Office organizes students to evaluate teachers' teaching work twice (out of 60 points, out of 30 points each time, and the scores are accumulated on average), and each teacher is evaluated by 20 student representatives. Teachers who undertake class teaching tasks are evaluated by the student representatives of the class. Teachers with more than two classes of teaching tasks are evaluated by the student representatives of each class; Teachers evaluate each other once every semester (out of 30 points); School administration (leadership) evaluates teaching once every semester (out of 30 points). According to the comprehensive evaluation of teaching, the cumulative score is/10.

5 education and teaching management (5 points)

Since taking office, he has actively participated in teaching management, and has served as a school head teacher, middle-level and above positions, teaching and research team leader, student section chief, student association counselor, etc. Do your duty. Quality evaluation grade score (5,3, 1, 0).

Third, the results of teacher evaluation and application

1. According to the assessment results, determine the comprehensive evaluation grade of each teacher's teaching quality: excellent: 85 points or above; Good: 75-84 points; Qualified: 60-74 points; Unqualified: below 60 points. The excellent rate shall not exceed 15% of the total number of teachers.

(1) In any of the following circumstances, it cannot be rated as excellent.

Answer: absenteeism without reason;

B: Those who arrive late and leave early more than 20 times a semester;

C: those who have general teaching accidents;

D: Those who leave for more than the days stipulated by the Education Bureau each semester.

(2) In any of the following circumstances, it is unqualified.

A: The total assessment score is below 60 points;

B: a serious teaching accident occurred;

C: truancy for more than 3 classes in one semester;

D: Being late and leaving early for more than 30 times a semester;

E: He received the above severe warning in that year.

2. Use of evaluation results

It is linked to the annual assessment, evaluation first, job recruitment, job promotion and performance evaluation.

Four. This scheme will be implemented as of the date of promulgation, and the right of interpretation lies in the principal's office.

Kindergarten education and teaching quality evaluation plan 4 i. Evaluation principles

1, incentive principle

Evaluation should be conducive to promoting the development of education and the growth of teachers; It is conducive to mobilizing the enthusiasm of teachers, encouraging teachers to go out of Man Qin, making them full of vitality, paying attention to teachers' ethics, studying business and teaching and educating people better; It is conducive to overcoming the egalitarian tendency in the management mechanism and promoting the internal management reform of the school; It is conducive to comprehensively implementing the party's educational policy and improving the quality of education and teaching.

2, the principle of comprehensiveness

In the assessment, we should adhere to the method of combining the usual assessment with the stage assessment, the assessment of leaders and teachers with the evaluation of parents and students, and make a comprehensive assessment and evaluation of the morality, ability, diligence and performance of faculty and staff to prevent perfection and generality.

3, the principle of objectivity

The assessment work should proceed from reality and seek truth from facts, and strive to make the assessment content true and comprehensive, the assessment method scientific and simple, and the assessment results objective and fair.

4. Guiding principles

In the assessment process, we should attach importance to teachers' ideological and political work, give priority to spiritual encouragement, supplemented by material rewards, actively guide teachers to participate in the assessment work, and guide teachers to stand on their posts and make contributions.

Second, the assessment content

The assessment content is divided into morality, ability, diligence, performance, workload and the work of the class teacher. Total assessment score 100, plus 40 points.

The focus of assessment is work performance, that is, teachers' political and ideological performance and work performance of teaching and educating people.

According to the assessment content and its detailed rules, it is summarized as an important basis for the semester and year-end bonus distribution, evaluation and selection, and work adjustment; According to the number of places in the Education Bureau, the annual assessment grades of teachers are divided into two groups: the head teacher and other teachers, and the grades are arranged from high to low according to a certain proportion.

Third, the evaluation method.

1, the central primary school set up an assessment leading group to deploy and organize the implementation of the assessment work. The assessment team consists of the principal, the vice principal, the education director, the director of the Political and Educational Affairs Office, the general affairs director, the young pioneers counselor, the discipline teaching and research team leader, and the distance education management teacher.

2, generally can take observation, lectures, seminars, public opinion surveys and access to teaching plans, handouts, study notes, students' homework, papers, meeting records, attendance records, teaching and research activities and other related information combined with the method of assessment.

3. In the assessment work, we should give an objective and fair evaluation on the basis of fully listening to the opinions of school leaders, peer teachers, the assessed teachers themselves, students and their parents.

Kindergarten Education Teaching Quality Evaluation Scheme 5 In order to strengthen the management of teaching quality in our school, reflect the teaching information normally and objectively evaluate the teaching quality of teachers, according to the relevant regulations of the school, the Measures for the Evaluation of Teaching Quality of xx University Teachers are formulated.

I. Purpose of the assessment

Through scientific and rigorous teaching quality evaluation, we can give a reasonable phased evaluation conclusion on teachers' teaching quality and level, so as to obtain comprehensive and comprehensive teaching quality information. Guide and encourage teachers to actively participate in teaching and teaching research, promote the renewal of teaching content, reform of teaching methods and means, and continuously improve the quality of education and teaching. Provide first-hand information for teaching management and teaching effect evaluation, and provide basic basis for the evaluation and appointment of teachers' professional and technical positions.

Second, the evaluation principle

1, the principle of objectivity, fairness and seeking truth from facts

The evaluation of teachers' teaching quality is a complicated and highly scientific work. In the process of evaluation, we should adhere to the law of education and teaching, combine the characteristics of teaching work in our school, formulate a scientific teaching evaluation index system, evaluate the teaching effect of teachers realistically, objectively and fairly reflect the teaching situation, promote the improvement of teachers' ideological and moral quality and teaching professional level, and improve the teaching quality.

2, the principle of combining qualitative and quantitative.

Teaching activity is a complicated process of teaching and learning, and there are many factors that affect the quality of teaching, some of which are qualitative indicators and some are quantitative indicators. On the basis of full investigation and study, the evaluation adopts the method of combining qualitative evaluation with quantitative evaluation to improve the credibility of the evaluation results.

3, the principle of comprehensive evaluation

In the evaluation of each course, we should fully consider the comprehensive evaluation from different angles and levels, especially pay attention to the evaluation of teachers' morality, strengthen the evaluation of practical teaching links and teaching process management and the evaluation of the overall teaching effect, and improve the effectiveness and pertinence of the evaluation.

III. Object and scope of assessment

The assessment objects of this method are full-time and part-time teaching teachers and external teachers of all courses in the whole school in the current semester. Including the whole teaching process and all theoretical courses, experimental training courses and comprehensive teaching courses offered by the school.

Fourth, evaluate the organization.

The school set up a leading group for the evaluation of teachers' teaching quality in xx University, headed by the leaders in charge of the school, to guide the whole school to carry out the evaluation of teachers' teaching quality. Each hospital department should set up a leading group for the evaluation of teaching quality of hospital departments headed by the director of the hospital department, which is responsible for the planning and implementation of the evaluation of teaching quality of undergraduate course (including part-time staff on campus who teach in undergraduate course).

Verb (abbreviation of verb) evaluation content and method

(1) Evaluation content

The evaluation of teaching quality of teachers in xx University is mainly composed of three parts: leader evaluation, peer evaluation and student evaluation. Among them, 20% were evaluated by leaders, 40% by peers (including 30% by peers, 65,438+00% by correcting lesson plans and homework) and 40% by students.

1, leader's evaluation of teaching.

Leadership evaluation of teaching is graded by leaders according to the lectures and daily performance of the evaluated teachers. Leaders mainly grade teachers' teaching attitude, basic teaching quality, teaching design ability, teaching methods, teaching content and teaching effect, and give suggestions for improvement.

2. Teaching peer evaluation

Peer evaluation of teaching means that teachers in our college grade by checking the assessed teachers' teaching plans, attending classes (pure experimental teachers mainly check the preparation and process of experiments), checking homework after class or correcting experimental reports. The review of lesson plans mainly evaluates the format and content of lesson plans; In-class lectures are mainly graded from the aspects of teaching instruments, basic teaching quality, teaching design ability, teaching methods, teaching content and teaching effect, and suggestions for improvement are given; The assessment of homework or experimental report after class is mainly based on the amount of homework assignment, students' completion, homework correction and score record.

3. Students' evaluation of teaching

Students' Evaluation of Teachers' Teaching All the students in the class taught by the evaluated teachers grade the teachers' teaching attitude, teaching process, teaching level and teaching effect through the comprehensive educational administration system of xx University, and put forward their own opinions and suggestions on the teachers' teaching situation to help teachers improve and improve the teaching quality. Individual colleges and departments that do not use the comprehensive educational administration system of xx University can manually evaluate teaching according to the same standards, and then make a summary.

appraisal procedure

The school gives a fixed evaluation content and score for each individual evaluation of the evaluated teachers, and the full score for each individual evaluation is 100. After the single evaluation, the leading group of teaching quality evaluation in each department will convert the scores into component values according to the individual scores of the evaluated teachers, accounting for 20% in the leadership evaluation, 65,438+00% in the teaching plan inspection and homework experiment report inspection, 30% in the classroom teaching (or experimental preparation and process) and 40% in the students' evaluation of teaching, and get the final score. According to the final score, the leading group of teaching quality evaluation of the hospital puts forward comprehensive evaluation opinions for each evaluated teacher, and determines the evaluation grade of each evaluated teacher according to four grades: excellent, good, qualified and unqualified. Among them, the number of excellent cases accounts for 30% of the total number of teachers evaluated in our department; The number of qualified teachers accounts for 40% of the total number of teachers in our college; Teachers whose final score is below 60 points are unqualified; If there has been a teaching accident this semester, the final grade shall not be excellent. Those who have had a first-class teaching accident this semester will be disqualified from the final ranking regardless of their final grades.

Teachers who fail to pass the examination shall immediately stop their teaching qualifications, and the hospital department shall be responsible for training, and make rectification and improvement within a time limit. After one semester, I will apply, the college leaders agree, and after the approval of the Academic Affairs Office, I will re-evaluate the teaching qualifications of teachers, and only after passing the examination can I obtain the teaching qualifications. If you fail to pass the examination twice in three years, you need to be transferred from your teaching post.

The school's teaching steering committee will review the evaluation results declared by the leading groups of teaching quality evaluation of colleges and departments, and announce the evaluation results of the whole school after the proportion of times passed is correct and there is no objection to the publicity.

This evaluation activity is based on the mid-term teaching inspection of the school and is evaluated once every semester. The assessment results will be loaded into my business file as an important basis for the evaluation and appointment of teachers' professional and technical positions.

Requirements for evaluation of intransitive verbs

According to the arrangement of teaching inspection in the middle of each semester, the evaluation activities are arranged in the middle of each semester in principle. Within one week after the end of the mid-term teaching inspection, each department should report the summary of the teaching quality evaluation of its own teachers (including part-time teachers in our school) and the comprehensive evaluation form of the teaching quality evaluation of teachers in xx University to the Academic Affairs Office. The Comprehensive Evaluation Form of Teaching Quality Evaluation of xx University is in duplicate for each person, one for the Academic Affairs Office and one for the school department, and the other original evaluation materials are kept by the school department for future reference.

Seven, in view of the special situation of teaching management in Accounting College and Distance Education College, we can formulate our own assessment methods for teachers' teaching quality with reference to these measures and report them to the Academic Affairs Office for the record. However, the evaluation summary of teachers' teaching quality and the control ratio of evaluation times in each semester must be reported to the Academic Affairs Office for approval within the specified time as required.

Eight, the measures shall be implemented as of the date of promulgation, and the right of interpretation belongs to the Academic Affairs Office.