Title, lead, theme, novelty and importance! News interview texts include news, newsletters, features, comments and interviews, which are characterized by authenticity, timeliness and accuracy, but there are great differences among various news styles. 1. News is a kind of news style, which reports news-worthy current events at home and abroad quickly and timely with general narrative and concise language. Its characteristics are true, fresh, flexible and concise. It emphasizes talking with facts, talking with new people and new things, and talking with images. Its basic elements include time, place, people, events, causes and consequences. The basic structure of news writing includes four parts: headline (subtitle, eyebrow headline and shoulder headline), introduction (first paragraph), theme (detailed description of events) and conclusion (brief comment). In news writing, we call it an "inverted pyramid" shape, that is, the result is said first, then the cause and process of the event; Say the main events first, and then add other related events appropriately. 2. Communication is a form of news reporting that reflects news events or typical people in detail and vividly through narration, description, lyricism and discussion. It belongs to narrative. The biggest feature that distinguishes communication from news is the vividness of description. That is, news emphasizes the authenticity of narration, while communication emphasizes the visualization of the process. Communication includes character communication, event communication, work communication and style communication. 3. Close-ups Close-ups are often just to capture some of the most expressive and characteristic fragments of news events, and to create images with strong emotional impact through various expression techniques, thus focusing and highlighting news events or news themes. Its greatness lies in vividly and intensively reproducing news scenes or news figures, paying attention to rendering and setting off the atmosphere, and emphasizing the attraction to readers. Close-ups include five categories: people close-ups, events close-ups, scenes close-ups, landscapes close-ups and works close-ups. 4. Comment on the problems expressed or even hidden in the current news or news, express your own views, or summarize new conclusions or viewpoints. It is characterized by giving priority to reason, or speaking, or speaking first. Its content must include asking questions, having a clear theme, a complete exposition, a reasonable exposition and a clear conclusion. It is a typical argumentative essay. 5. Interview To interview an insider, the event itself or an expert because of someone, something or some problems, and ask them to answer the questions raised and report the article in the form of documentary talk is called an interview. The object of the interview must be people, and the content of the interview can be news events or historical events, social issues that people are generally concerned about, or interviews with people. The basic characteristics of the interview are pertinence, theme and typicality. That is, the purpose of the interview is particularly strong, aiming at something, someone and a problem; Ask questions around a center; The people, events and problems interviewed are of typical significance. To do an interview well, we must do three things well: have a detailed understanding of the interviewee and content; The subject of the interview should be clear, and the questions should be concise and targeted; You should have good questioning skills. Reading methods of news interview texts In news interview texts, relatively speaking, interviews, current reviews and close-ups are more likely to be selected by proposers as trial reading texts, while news is too short and communication is too dull, so there is no foothold for proposition. When reading the news interview text, the most noteworthy thing is that no matter what kind of news text expresses the author's point of view or not, it will reflect the author's (reporter's) news position. When reading, we should try our best to read what the author wants to say and accurately understand the author's views and tendencies, which will help us to correctly screen the information in the text, grasp the views and evaluate the value of the text, and also help us explore the life value and the spirit of the times of the text. (1) The reading of thematic stories belongs to narrative, which contains some characteristics of narrative. When reading, we can learn from some basic methods of novel reading, such as the expressive force of important words and wonderful sentences, the clues and functions of event narration, the methods and functions of environmental description, the characteristics and description methods of characters, the characteristics and functions of material details, the characteristics and conception skills of event development, etc. , is basically the same. The key to reading a feature article is to grasp the people, events and things in the article, grasp the clues and levels of event narration, and grasp the content, theme and text significance of the article. 1. Grasp the main content of the text. First, the main information of the text can be obtained through the title of the text, including the main characters, major events, and even the author's views and attitudes; Secondly, by reading the text, we can understand the cause, process, result and influence of the event. Third, summarize the main idea of the text through overall reading and refine the central idea of the article; Fourthly, try to figure out the meaning, expressive force and application skills of some important words and wonderful sentences in the text through the context. 2. Master the idea and structure of the text. First, find the sequence and clues of the event narrative. Secondly, divide the event into several stages. Thirdly, distinguish narrative methods and understand the skills and functions of the author's layout. 3. Explore the meaning and value of the text. The meaning of the text is reflected in the author's writing intention, that is, what the author wants to reflect, promote or criticize through this close-up story; The value of the text is mainly reflected in the positive or negative impact of the text content on real life, and whether it has a guiding or warning role. (2) Reading news commentary is a typical argumentative essay. Its structure is basically to list some news events (phenomena), put forward discussion questions from the news, analyze the root, essence and influence (positive or negative) of the problem from multiple angles and levels, form a discussion on a phenomenon (not a single case) with similar events, and finally form a clear conclusion. As a typical argumentative essay, its reading method is similar to argumentative essay reading. For example, grasping the theme of the article, screening the material information in the article, grasping the argument structure, analyzing the main argument methods or language expressions, evaluating the main points of the article, discussing the writing background and intention, and discovering the meaning and value of the article are all similar to the contents of modern text reading. The key to reading news commentary lies in: first, grasping the central argument of the article, that is, the author's point of view and attitude; The second is to master the relevant materials used by the author; The third is to grasp the thinking and structure of the author's argumentation and analysis. 1. Grasping the central argument of the text involves many test sites such as "summarizing the central meaning of the text", "evaluating the main points and basic orientation of the text", "exploring the life value and spirit of the times of the text" and "exploring the author's writing background and intention". When reading, we should first pay attention to the questions about news events listed by the author, that is, the questions to be analyzed in the article, and then follow the map to find the answers, that is, the author's views and attitudes; Secondly, by reading the author's argumentation process, we can see what the author's conclusion is after analyzing the materials; The third is to look at one or two paragraphs at the end of the article to see how the author summarizes his analysis and what kind of social phenomenon or attitude towards life is based on. 2. Grasping the relevant materials of argumentative papers here mainly involves three test sites: the screening and integration of text information, the main techniques of analyzing the text, and the exploration of some problems in the text and putting forward their own opinions. When reading, first of all, we should pay attention to marking the materials, such as positive, negative, realistic, ancient, example sentences, quotations, metaphors and so on. , one by one; Secondly, it is necessary to analyze which materials prove which point of view (or arguments against the other side's point of view, or materials that prove their own arguments); Third, some methods of material application, such as quotation, example, metaphor, parallelism, questioning, or combination of point and surface, positive and negative combination, layer by layer promotion, etc. Fourth, we should pay more attention to some possible problems in the use of written materials. 3. Grasp the idea and structure of the article. There are two test sites here: "Analyze the basic characteristics of the article" and "Grasp the structure of the article". When reading, you can refer to the general thinking mode of argumentative writing, from asking questions to analyzing and solving problems. It should be noted that the current comments are often aimed at a thing or a phenomenon, starting from the event or phenomenon, discussing their own views from multiple angles or levels, and finally drawing a conclusion with universal social significance or value. Therefore, the current commentary structure is relatively compact, the ideas are not scattered, and it is easier to grasp. (3) The key to reading articles in news interview is to grasp the theme of the interview, sort out the clues of the interview, summarize the contents of the interview, analyze the skills of the interview, evaluate the effect of the interview and explore the value of the interview. 1, grasp the interview process and the contents of each part. A complete interview documentary usually has many questions, which involve many aspects on the surface, but the interviewer often asks questions from different angles and levels around a center. Therefore, through the interviewer's questions, we should quickly grasp the topic of the interview and the different aspects involved. Secondly, summarize the main viewpoints, positions and attitudes by reading the respondents' answers; In this way, we can understand the interviewee's outlook on life, values and his suggestions on a certain problem. This inevitably involves the integration of the content of the article, the summary of the main idea of the article, the grasp of the structure of the article and other test sites, and its interpretation and analysis methods are the same as our previous studies on text reading and literary text reading. 2. It is not common to analyze the expression of interviews and investigate the expression of news interviews. On the one hand, interview skills are aimed at questioners, which are generally divided into direct and indirect questions, and can also be divided into direct questions, interesting questions, indirect questions, induced questions, cross-questions, rhetorical questions and comparative questions. On the other hand, it is aimed at the respondents' skills, which generally include rhetorical skills such as quotation, metaphor, analogy, rhetorical question and repetition. , and come straight to the point to show your attitude, put forward your own views euphemistically and implicitly, advance layer by layer, reveal the essence, give consideration to both sides, and avoid sharp edges. In terms of language style, some are unpretentious, some are simple and easy to understand, some skillfully use proverbs, some quote poems, and some are vivid. 3. The appreciation and evaluation of the interview is first to evaluate the main viewpoints and basic tendencies of the interviewer or interviewee. The interviewer's opinions and tendencies are generally reflected in his questions. From the language and tone of questions, we can often infer or even judge the interviewer's position and attitude towards questions, especially the context of his position can be found in his continuous questions. Generally speaking, respondents' views and attitudes are relatively clear and will be clearly expressed in their answers. To evaluate their views or tendencies, one is to find out the examples they quoted from the whole interview record and analyze the logic and science of their reasoning; The second is to connect with reality to see whether their views and attitudes conform to the laws of social development, public values and morality, and universal ideas. The second is to evaluate the interviewee's ideas, personality characteristics and personality quality. By reading the interviewee's answers, we can understand his views on problems, his attitude and habits towards life, and his comments on some outlook on life and the world. Through these. We can also infer his attitude and method of dealing with people, as well as his basic attitude towards life, work, career, family, friends and hobbies. , can reflect his outlook on life, world view, reflect his ideas, personality characteristics, personality quality. The difficulty here is how to sum up the essential things from the phenomena. The third is to evaluate the social value and influence of the subject matter, content and viewpoint in the interview. Generally speaking, the topic of interviews is often people or things that the public is concerned about, which is closely related to the whole society or a certain class at present. Therefore, the interview must have certain social value (whether positive or negative), and the opinions or tendencies of the interviewees often have a certain impact on society or a certain class of people. When reading evaluation, we need to compare the social background (phenomenon) and people's values at that time, and realistically analyze the positive or negative impact of the evaluation text on society and how we should treat these impacts.