A philosophy professor came to the zoo to teach philosophy to animals. The philosophy professor talked about many empty theories, and then said, "Everything should start from the foundation, just like any building should start from the bottom." A frog was impatient and asked the professor, "Excuse me, professor, do all buildings really have to start from the ground floor?" The philosophy professor glanced at the frog and said, "Of course! Frog in the well! " The frog retorted, "It's because it's a frog at the bottom of a well that I ask you-do you dig a well from the bottom of the well?" The philosophy professor was speechless. Animals have said, "Yes, even frogs in the well have their own unique opinions, let alone not?" ?

Analyze this material and learn analytical methods.

Step 1: Find out the object stated in the material. The material objects are:

1, Professor 2, Frog 3, Animals

Step 2: Find out the result of the stated object in the event. 1, the professor was finally refuted by the frog.

The frog refuted the professor.

The animals contradict the professor.

Step 3: From the causal point of view, why is there such a result, and on this basis, the central argument is put forward positively.

1, the professor was stunned because:

Separation of theory and practice

The conclusion is that theory should be combined with practice.

2) Specific problems cannot be analyzed in detail.

Draw a conclusion: learn to analyze specific problems.

3) Speak too absolutely

Draw a conclusion: learn to analyze the problem comprehensively or don't be too absolute.

2. The frog refuted the professor because

(1) Dare to question. (2) Dare to challenge authority.

3. Animals refute the professor because:

The professor only believes in himself and despises others. Draw a conclusion: see the advantages of others.