Refuting a paper often stands in the middle, that is, while refuting the wrong argument of the other party, it puts forward its own correct point of view in tit for tat. There are three ways to refute the wrong argument: 1. Refute an argument; 2. refute the argument; 3. refute the argument.

Refutation is closely related to argument, because when I refute the wrong point of view of the other party, I often have to put forward my own correct argument tit for tat in order to refute the wrong argument. It is necessary to grasp whether the "breakthrough" is a direct argument or an indirect argument through arguments and arguments. Moreover, we should pay attention to refuting the language characteristics of the paper, and it will be better to use rhetorical devices such as rhetorical questions or rhetorical questions to strengthen the effect!