The moral of this move is that you can use phrases and never use words. You can use complex sentences and never use single sentences. As we know, Humboldt has a famous saying: "Language is the infinite use of limited means." At the same time, transformational generative grammar wisely points out that languages are recursive. Based on the above fruitful achievements of human civilization, we often consciously apply them to practice, thus resulting in the primary school and school change of word-making. The advantage of this method is that it can expand the meaning of a certain core within a limited framework, effectively dilute the utilization efficiency of words, and thus improve the level of making up numbers. However, the disadvantage of this method is that the trace is too exposed and easy to be found, and if it is too deliberate, it will often give people the impression of procrastination. Therefore, the effect of this method is obvious, but also limited. Chairman Mao taught us not to care about the gains and losses of one city and one place, but to concentrate on annihilating the effective strength of our opponents. So we have the following advanced version.
The second move, pull.
If change is the most elementary stage, then change can be said to be an advanced version. The essence of Kuang is to write articles with syntactic structure. That is, to lengthen the overall structure of the language. We know that if there are more chickens, there will be more eggs. When the structure grows, the number of words will naturally go up. For example, if we change the sentence "Let's go to class together", the result may be "My classmates and I happily go to the classroom on the first floor to have a physics class", while if we use "rest", the result may be "My classmates and I happily go to class, and my classmates teach physics in the classroom on the first floor". Through data analysis, we can also see that the efficiency of "reeling" is roughly 1.5 times that of "reeling", which is obviously a more effective way. However, the disadvantage of this method is that it is easy to break sentences and there may be some obstacles in understanding.
The third move, oh.
Europeanized grammar is also Europeanized. Because the discipline system is becoming more and more rigorous, the discussion must be logical and rigorous. However, it is difficult for traditional Chinese grammar to do this comprehensively. Of course, I have never seen a great god who writes papers in classical Chinese, but it is rare. In fact, this is also the author's sorrow. How sad and desolate it is to write papers in other languages and Chinese instead of thinking logically in China. I have never felt that Europeanized grammar is very low-end, and I have to do it because of the big environment. Of course, from a practical point of view, Europeanized grammar is undoubtedly a weapon to gather vocabulary. The main means of this method is to turn restrictive words into clauses as much as possible, and add parentheses without affecting the structure. In this way, first of all, the article can become more patchy in the overall language, and at the same time, it will not be too broken in structure to affect reading. For example, the sentence "This is how we know this problem, the fact is" must be written as "This problem. In a sense, we should hold this view and consider it from a specific angle. The emergence of the problem may be beneficial to our research, but if we look at the development of this problem in detail, we can judge the reality as follows. " The content of the twelve characters has been Europeanized into more than 80 words, and at the same time it appears rigorous and orderly. Actually, we only have one purpose, you know. (Literal translation completely turns Europeanized syntax into a lump, and Pound's poem is translated into "a peach face in a crowd, which is surprising." How beautiful it is to have gloomy branches and dense petals falling. The result is literally destroyed as "the faces in the crowd are ghostly, and there are many petals on the wet black branches." Many translators really get a score of 100 in English and fail in Chinese. )
Like the fourth move.
For each conclusion, it is best to make an analogy or give an example later. First, it is easy to understand. Second, if it is a counterexample, you can put the remaining arguments here when collecting materials. Third, you know. For example, we go to the classroom together. For example, when Murong Ziying and stanislavski went to class together that day, the clover in front of the door giggled and broke the boring physics class. It's best to look casual, for one thing, it has a natural aesthetic feeling, and for another, it effectively washes away the suspicion of spelling words. When giving examples, it is best to use conclusions to prove it, so that the article is truly easy to understand and the number of words can ensure safety. By the way, you can also use the method of dropping your schoolbag to combat the arrogance of Xueba. This is not entirely a word count, but an absolutely necessary bunch of words. If our word count work is only word count, then writing a paper is meaningless, just deal with it. If you want to take the academic road, you must take examples seriously.
The fifth measure, exhibition.
This trick starts with a single word, and when you can use terminology, it will appear high-end atmosphere. Secondly, if it is a difficult word, you can't help but explain it. This explanation absolutely makes sense. Therefore, these are undoubtedly the results of word count. As far as the overall structure is concerned, we should try to expand the terminology layer by layer with the following examples. For example, binary opposition and China Revolution, binary opposition is a noun. Combining with China Revolution, we can explore what is the binary opposition of China Revolution, whether there is binary opposition in every aspect of binary opposition, why the author has such an understanding, and what is the result of this understanding. Generally, according to the number of roads or something, why and how. In essence, this is beyond the scope of words. According to the feedback of readers' children's shoes, sometimes it is not difficult to collect papers. In the thesis, we still have to get back to the topic from time to time. It's best to echo the topic every two or three paragraphs, and gently tie the topic to a piece of paper, instead of digressing from Wan Li at last, so you can't pull it back.
The sixth move, cited.
The reference here is naturally citing examples and stacking materials. However, we should know that the thesis is different from the composition of high school students, and we can't expect to use "life is like an empty dream, but it is short-lived. Only heaven remains unchanged and has never changed." -stanislavski's "Leaving Chuchkov" deceived the teacher's eyes by such old means. How to pile up the materials and how to effectively fill in the words without verbosity is a serious problem. Here we recommend the following methods:
First of all, talking about it requires more words than focusing on it. We know that papers, especially Chinese papers, are always phenomena-analysis-phenomena-analysis-conclusion. And this common logical structure is our sharp weapon for spelling words. We know that there is a very famous principle in mathematics, the principle of inclusion and exclusion. In fact, this is also a principle we adopt when analyzing materials, that is, in the process of narration and discussion, the total amount of all analysis must be greater than the total amount of centralized analysis. The redundant part is the part that is more or less repeated, and this repetition will be deducted when we concentrate on analysis. In this way, in the process of separate narration, this kind of intentional or unintentional repetition is not easy to be found at first, and it is not easy to be seen in the process of narration and discussion because of the dilution of materials. At the same time, due to the relationship between separate discussion and analysis, there will always be some mutual echoes between various materials, such as "We talked about the last material" and "Let's continue to explain it below". This is the essence of the number of words, and the so-called "no word is romantic" is the truth. At the same time, under the premise of discussing this separately, we will always make a summary and analysis at the end, and this summary is also something that comes out of thin air, and this is exactly what we are pursuing.
Second, when quoting literature, try to quote different opinions as much as possible. First of all, it seems that the high-end atmosphere is high-grade, and employers read more books. In fact, we know that undergraduate thesis is basically done by seniors. A little pruning can find a lot of useful information. If you don't take the trouble to check the original source and quote it a little, it will naturally be higher. Anyway, if you don't make a fist and smile, the teacher can't hold much. Including quotations, you can also follow the trace and touch the melon again, and so on until the end of the world.
Third, when introducing different viewpoints, it is best to pay attention to choosing those statements with similar general idea but slight differences. If a certain statement is said by a Russian, so much the better. We all know that the Russian name is bug. As we have argued before, if you ask questions several times at less dense intervals, the problem will basically be solved. What are the advantages of this practice? Obviously, the consistency of the general direction can ensure that the argument will not contradict itself, so that the paper has room to continue, while the differences in small aspects bring us unlimited possibilities for concept analysis. We know that under the current concept-oriented style of study, it is the most beneficial and cheapest way to define a concept in detail and analyze it. According to the graduate's observation, many university tyrants are used to using this method in their papers, but they are more professional and can really distinguish something.
After reading the whole article, I think everyone has a deeper understanding of the wording requirements of the master's thesis. What should I do if there are not enough words in my master's thesis? According to my own experience, the author summarizes some methods and skills for your reference. Of course, there are more ways. You can also ask your predecessors for advice. I hope your master's thesis can meet the word requirement, which is also the purpose of sharing this article.