First of all, the published papers can reflect the scientific research ability and academic level of researchers. An excellent paper represents the author's in-depth research and contribution in a certain field. The publication of papers needs peer review, so the papers accepted for publication usually have certain academic value and can prove the author's academic status in this field.

Secondly, the number of published papers is also one of the important indicators to evaluate a researcher's title. The number of papers can reflect the research productivity and working ability of researchers. To a certain extent, many papers have been published, which shows that researchers have high work efficiency and strong scientific research practice ability. Therefore, in some professional title evaluation criteria, the number of published papers will be regarded as one of the important evaluation indicators.

However, there are some problems in evaluating professional titles only by publishing papers. First of all, the quality and academic influence of papers are important indicators to evaluate a researcher's academic ability. Some professional title evaluation standards will require SCI to retrieve papers to evaluate the influence of researchers in academic circles. Secondly, publishing a paper is only a way to evaluate a researcher's academic ability, and other factors should be considered comprehensively, such as the commitment of scientific research projects, the application of patents and software copyrights.