Reflections on correcting primary school students' compositions
Composition correction is a kind of reading, a kind of spiritual communication, a kind of enjoyment and an improvement. Therefore, students' sense of participation can not be ignored. Correction will push students to another frontier of writing, let them learn from each other, learn from each other's strengths and gradually form a strong interest in composition. Therefore, we have made such an attempt in composition correction: that is, students criticize each other mainly, supplemented by teachers' correction. Then, how should the composition correction be carried out? The first step is to explain the purpose and significance of mutual approval and mutual revision and stimulate interest. The second step is to teach methods and teach them to fish. First of all, we should teach students the symbols of composition correction. The general method of teaching students to correct their compositions: 1. Whether the format is correct, full marks. Incorrect format, penalty points. When changing the composition, write only one comment in format: the format is correct. Approval is given by deduction. If this item is not deducted, this article will be given full marks, and then the name of the reviser will be signed. 2. Whether the roll surface is clean and tidy, full marks. If the paper surface is irregular, you will lose points. Next time you write your own composition, pay attention to the roll. 3. A few typos. If you find a typo, you should mark it in the original text, write it in the comments, and then write the word after it. Some careless students can't pick out typos. What should I do? Let's do assembly line homework: each person has to approve four articles, and each article has to go through the hands of four people, namely, A, B, C and D. A has approved six typos, and B finds that this article has seven typos instead of six, so A has to write an explanation of 100 words to explain why this typo is missing. C found that there were eight typos in this article, so students A and B should be held accountable and given instructions of 100 words. If typos are found, every two points will be deducted 1 point, and a maximum of 5 points will be deducted. If it exceeds 10, no points will be deducted, but it should be corrected one by one. 4. There are several ill sentences. Pick out the sick sentences in the article. All ill sentences should be underlined, and then in the comments, write a few ill sentences clearly. Every sentence is reduced by 1 point, reduced by 5 points, and will not be reduced again. 5. There are several obvious errors in punctuation, emphasizing the use of periods, quotation marks, exclamation points and question marks. If an obvious mistake is found, one point will be deducted, five points will be deducted, and if it exceeds five points, it will not be deducted. 6. See if the center of the article is clear and focused. When guiding composition, give specific examples and tell students what is clear and what is centralized. Before the students correct it, 7. Look at the material selection of the article. This comment puts forward three requirements: ① whether to focus on the center. (2) Whether it conforms to the reality of life. ③ Whether it is typical. The most important of these three points is the first one. With the improvement of composition level, the typical requirements of material selection are put forward. 8. Look at the structure of the article. As far as the structure is concerned, three comments should also be written: ① Whether the hierarchical paragraphs are clear. ② Whether the transition is natural. ③ Whether the beginning and the end are coordinated. 9. Expression mainly depends on whether it meets the requirements of the article genre. Narrative is mainly narrative, expository is mainly explanation, and argumentative is of course mainly discussion. In addition, it depends on whether it meets the requirements of composition guidance. 10. It depends on whether the language is concise, fluent and accurate. If the language is not concise, those who are repetitive and verbose will be deducted as appropriate, and this item will not exceed two points. If the language is not fluent, it does not mean that there are sick sentences, but the cohesion between sentences is not coherent, and the penalty will not exceed two points. 1 1. Comments: Eyebrow criticism (pertinence, knowledge, interest and accuracy) General criticism (enlightening, concrete and constructive) Standard (more praise and less criticism) Step 3, teachers demonstrate and correct. Choose the middle and lower composition and correct words, phrases and sentences with unified correction symbols. Eyebrows are always meticulous, and wonderful sentences are marked with wavy lines. Then print this demonstration marking paper and send it to each student, so that students can overcome the randomness and blindness of marking, help students walk and imitate. Then, choose a medium-level composition to print and distribute to the students, and the whole class will batch one composition in a many-to-one way. This revision can be described as a collective effort. In the process of revision, students can clearly understand what should be affirmed, what needs to be improved, and how to revise, and then change their own articles and make progress in revision and revision, which will help students improve their overall writing level. The fourth step, students use one-on-one peer review, each student only approves one copy at a time, and the burden is not heavy. The reformers try their best to make careful consultations, and the reformers humbly ask for advice and make careful revisions, which are beneficial to both the reformers and the reformed ones. Step 5: Write down the composition after writing and return it to the author, who will read it again and think about the changes. If there is any objection, he can discuss the revision with the reviser. Write down your thoughts, inspirations or suggestions for revision. Encourage students to re-create in their spare time according to the revised opinions to improve their writing level. Step 6: The teacher reviews the composition again. After the above work is completed, give the composition to the teacher. The teacher examines the original text (understanding writing), marks papers (mastering mutual approval) and postscript (finding benefits), and prepares the evaluation materials.