I. Introduction:

The review of sci papers goes through several steps: preliminary review, reviewer review, revision/rejection, rework review and final decision. The time to complete these steps is probably the time required for reviewing sci papers, and there is no uniform standard, which is related to the efficiency of reviewing journals and the quality of articles.

Second, the audit method:

1, preliminary examination: After the sci paper is submitted, it must go through preliminary examination first, which usually takes 1-2 weeks to complete. Of course, many articles will be rejected in the first trial.

2. Auditor's audit: The auditor's audit time mainly depends on the auditor, generally about 1-3 months. If the reviewers have great differences of opinion, they may be required to re-review, which takes longer than the results directly reviewed by the reviewers.

3. Revision/rejection: The rejected paper is equivalent to failing to pass the review of the journal. Papers that need to be revised need to be completed by the author according to the revision opinions. Modification is divided into minor repairs and major repairs, and major repairs take a long time. Generally speaking, the author has 1-3 months to make corrections. In addition, it is also possible to be hired directly, which can save time for revision and revision, but it is rare.

4. Revision and review: If the revised paper needs to be returned to the journal for re-review, it may take 1 month or longer. If there are two or three revisions, it will definitely take longer than one revision.

5. Final decision: After rework or repeated rework, there will be a final decision. If hired, the assessment is completed. If it is rejected, it means that the audit is not passed.

Third, the influencing factors:

The quality of the paper, the busyness of the journal, the author's response speed, etc. Among them, the quality of the paper and the author's reaction speed are the key factors. In this process, the author needs to reply to the reviewer's comments and suggestions as soon as possible to speed up the review of the paper.

Sci summary skills and collection types:

First, skills:

1. Pay attention to the running direction and characteristics of journals, and choose journals that meet your own research direction.

2. The quality and originality of the paper should be high, which is the key to successful publication.

3. The writing of papers should be standardized, including format, punctuation, references, etc., so as to meet the requirements of journals.

4. The submitted papers should be carefully proofread and reviewed to avoid low-level errors and grammatical errors.

5. When submitting a manuscript, you should carefully fill in the submission letter and abstract, and provide enough information and background for editors and reviewers to better understand the paper.

6, in the process of review, should actively cooperate with the examiner's work, timely reply to review comments and suggestions for revision.

7. If you are invited as a reviewer, you should take the review seriously and provide objective and fair comments.

Second, the collection type:

1, published.

2, special issue, special issue is often a positive issue with a specific theme, such as a country's epidemic situation and treatment research progress. However, due to its specific theme, special issues are often added when they are included in SCI database.

3. supplement.

4. make up language.

5. news

6. Meeting settings.