Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - What should a doctoral thesis look like?
What should a doctoral thesis look like?
Headlines pay attention to the writing of doctoral thesis, which is actually the deepening of doctoral degree courses and a higher level of academic training. Students who have received professional academic training in colleges and universities often use dissertations to condense and show their hard work in learning for many years. On the whole, the academic level of doctoral dissertations is relatively high, and they constitute an important part of a country's academic achievements. A professor in Peking University once compared doctoral thesis writing to a benchmark. For writers, doctoral thesis really seems to be a benchmark. If you can't jump or barely pass, it can only show that the writer's knowledge is not ready and his kung fu is not solid enough to be qualified to wear a doctoral hat. The same is true for doctoral dissertations in economics. A qualified doctoral thesis can be said that the writer crossed the bar and entered the academic hall of economics. Not superficial, the author intends to talk about some related problems in doctoral thesis writing on the basis of existing research results and combined with economics major. Thesis title: The important starting point is different from writing other articles. First of all, we should choose a suitable topic for the doctoral thesis. For many doctoral supervisors, thesis topic selection is an "important starting point", and doctoral students should pay special attention to: first, whether the thesis topic selection is worth doing. The so-called "worth doing" means that it has theoretical value. As long as you work hard, it is possible to innovate in theory and methods, and it may even contribute to the development of this discipline. Because economics is a highly applied science, it is necessary to consider whether it is of practical significance to study this issue. Only with high theoretical value and strong practical significance is it a subject worth studying. I can choose the topic of my thesis and write it well. It is also a problem that must be considered to determine whether this topic can make full use of its own knowledge accumulation and maximize its own strengths. If you grasp a hot topic at will, even if it has high theoretical value, you may not be able to write it well. This is because the topic is out of touch with my long-term knowledge accumulation, interests and specialties, and I can't give full play to my comparative advantages, so it is difficult to write, or even difficult to complete. The topic should not be too small or too big, so we should make a big fuss, that is, the so-called "small topic, big article." "Small topic, big article" is not only conducive to play its role, but also suitable for control, making the research results more solid. Good topic selection, although the topic seems small, but the depth and thickness are relatively large. When writing academic papers, research should go straight to the point, and not be greedy for perfection and blossom everywhere. Choose topics that have not been studied and dabbled in before. Selecting the topic from a new angle makes the topic and the topic of the paper pioneering, original and novel. Only in this way can we make in-depth and innovative research results. Try to choose topics that have long-term research value for yourself. After all, the doctoral thesis is a phased research achievement. Although this achievement is very important, it may not be the starting point of my future research work. In the long run, we should try to choose a topic that can be done around this problem for a long time as the topic of writing a doctoral thesis. Standardizing the writing of academic papers citing academic documents, especially doctoral dissertations, is the first step of academic standardization training, and it is also a "standardized" result. The so-called standardization of academic literature citation refers to the importance of indicating the source of citation, which is the basic rule that scholars should follow in writing. Academics are accumulated and precipitated from generation to generation. Therefore, all the viewpoints and arguments in any paper cannot be their own, and some even some important viewpoints or arguments are quoted from others, which is allowed. But if you quote other people's views or arguments, you must indicate that the comments should not be vague. On the one hand, it respects the achievements of others, on the other hand, it is also convenient for reviewers and readers to understand the sources of paper materials and opinions or arguments. Although academic research is always carried out on the basis of absorbing predecessors' achievements, academic citation should be limited, which is also a basic requirement of academic norms. A doctoral thesis of about 65,438+10,000 words, if there are too many references and a large number of quotations from other people's achievements, how many opinions and contents belong to you? Plagiarism and plagiarism are the most prominent academic corruption phenomena in the current university campus. Copying other people's works has almost become an open secret for some university graduate students. It is inevitable to write a doctoral thesis and cite academic documents, but we must grasp the degree. This basic limitation is that reading can make people feel that the paper is really written by you, not copied from predecessors or contemporary scholars.