Scientific "rebound" can make students' thinking quality rise to a higher level and give people a sense of innovation. The college entrance examination essay topic "Those who are near the ink are black/those who are near the ink are not necessarily black", you can choose one to write an argumentative essay, and the latter is a "rebound" to the former. The irony of "teaching experts to show off their skills" is obvious, while China advocates "finding a master at chess and making an axe". However, "learning without a teacher" has taken many detours, which makes it difficult to succeed, and even leads to a situation of wandering at a low level forever, and finally it is difficult to enter the room. "An artist is bold" is self-evident, while "a bold artist is skilled" is even more reasonable, because bold artists will bravely explore difficult movements and constantly create new tricks. Consciously cultivating this kind of thinking character will make our composition have a new mechanism and create a new realm.
First, learn to think reversely, dare to put forward different opinions, dare to break away from the shackles of habitual thinking and old traditional concepts, jump out of the old box of conformism and rut, and boldly imagine. Make a difference, turn decay into magic, and be unconventional.
Secondly, this argument should stand scrutiny. Reverse seeking differences should be carried out in a certain language environment or a specific social background. Only by strictly following objective laws and accurately grasping the essence of things can we avoid going from one extreme to the other. If you mistake "rebound" for "random play" and make a biased argument, you will draw a tiger instead of a dog, which will make people laugh and be generous.
Third, the "rebound" is not universal, and not everything or opinions can be reversed. Those "bounces" that violate scientific principles, people's knowledge and hurt people's feelings are all undesirable. For example, if you want to praise it and change people's traditional ideas, it will be difficult for people to agree.
Example 1
When I first saw this information about "memory" transplantation, I still felt "sorry". If only I had a machine here! Copy all the memories of Lu Xun, Kekule, Chen Jingrun, Einstein and Chen Yinque, the master of language, into my mind. At least in the examination room of the college entrance examination, I can take my time and I will win!
However, on second thought, I am a little confused: if this becomes a reality, will I find myself confused and confused all day?
Every one of us, whether a talented poet or a laid-off worker struggling for life, has unique characteristics and is a landscape in this vast world. Even if I am ordinary, even if I am humble, I can at least live a quiet and stable life, and I can at least find my place in society. Yes, I hope I can write sharp articles like Lu Xun. I hope I can study impressive scientific achievements like Einstein, and I hope I can master many languages like Mr. Chen Yinque. However, I know this better: if you want to achieve something, you must work hard and pay a high price for success!
Transplanting memory, regardless of the ethical problems it brings, even if it-someone else's memory-can win me the Nobel Prize, what can I be proud of? This kind of behavior should at least be regarded as plagiarism? ! Who are the learned people who don't "walk steadily and be a clear man"?
I admire Mr. Xie Mian, Mr. Chen Pingyuan and Mr. Ji Xianlin ... I admire their majestic composure, profound quotations and profound analysis; If all this is combined with Geng Jie's moral integrity, what a thought-provoking spiritual charm it will be! From them, I understand a profound truth: in learning, we must first learn and cultivate our own personality. With my qualifications, being poor all my life may not be able to reach their height, and I may not be qualified to discuss academic issues with them. But I have no regrets and a clear conscience. Because I have learned about their Geng Jie personality, which is enough to benefit me for life.
I don't want other people's memories, even if one day it really becomes a reality. To be an honest person, a useful person and a person with a clear conscience is the goal that all of us should pursue! I don't want other people's memories!
(Around the scope of "if memory can be transplanted", most candidates follow the discussion premise of "transplantation", or make up stories or make comments to imagine the benefits that memory transplantation will bring to society and life in the future. However, this paper says "no" to memory transplantation uncharacteristically, holds a negative attitude, is novel, unique and creative, and shows the examinee's reverse thinking.
)