One of the mistakes: there is no clear central argument in the full text.
Speaking and writing articles is to express ideas and convey feelings. The author of an argumentative essay should first put forward his own views and opinions in the article. The article must have a correct and distinct argument, clearly indicating what he is in favor of and against, and it cannot be vague or ambiguous. If an article can't do this, it is naturally not a good article.
The countermeasure is to learn and understand the three elements of argumentative writing: argument, argument and argumentation method, of which argument is the most important.
Mistake 2: Wrong style.
When writing materials, it is generally clear that the style of writing is different, not only the conception and structure of the article, but also the language expression. Generally speaking, MBA exam composition is argumentative, mainly argumentative, and can also be expressed by narrative, descriptive and explanatory articles, but the contents of narrative, descriptive and explanatory articles are all used as materials for argumentation. Generally speaking, an article is not argumentative if it is not mainly about discussion and expression. This kind of mistake is a major mistake in composition.
The reasons for this error are as follows: such candidates did not pay attention to the examination of the questions, and the proposition clearly stated that they wanted to write an argumentative paper, but the candidates turned a blind eye; It may also be that candidates can't tell the style clearly, and they don't know that argumentative essays should focus on discussion. Stylistic mistakes make this composition irrelevant.
The countermeasures are as follows: first, carefully examine the questions and write according to the genre requirements. Second, to master the writing methods of different styles, the most important thing is to master the language expressions of different styles. Narrative is mainly expressed by narration and description, expository by explanation and argumentative by discussion.
Mistake 3: There is no material given in the proposition, and there is no trace of material in the whole article.
Materials are the basis of your composition, and the ideas (topics) you talk about in the article must come from materials. This point must be made clear in the text. Secondly, it is caused by the randomness of candidates. The candidate didn't adjust his position. You're here for the exam. You should write according to the instructions of the proposition. Under certain conditions, you should write within a certain range. There is no deviation, no digression, no writing whatever you want. It is possible that some candidates have prepared or recited several model essays before the exam, and they lack the ability to adapt themselves after arriving at the examination room, so they wrote a prepared model essay with no goal. Such a composition will never meet the requirements of the examination questions. Such a mistake is a big mistake, and it is impossible to get good grades in the exam.
The countermeasures are as follows: First, we should solve the cognitive problems of candidates. Honestly put yourself in the right position to take the exam, get rid of randomness, and be sure to carefully examine the questions and write as required. Second, we should practice writing honestly, especially the way of writing materials. No means no, just learn honestly. It is ok to read some model essays before the exam, and you must never take the exam by guessing questions, let alone copy the model essays on the test paper.
Mistake 4: The materials given in the plagiarism proposition are usually placed at the beginning of the composition and also in the composition; Others expand the materials given in the exam questions.
The reasons for this error are as follows: First, candidates know that the materials given in the examination questions are the basis of the composition, but they don't know how to extract or draw out the ideas to be discussed in the composition from the provided materials, thinking that copying the materials is enough. Secondly, it is also possible that some candidates will not analyze the materials, will not extract writing ideas from the materials, and have to copy the materials. The consequences of writing like this are very bad. A composition is 500 to 600 words. If you copy the materials, it will take up more than 100 words at once. The writing point of view has not been refined and has not played any role in the composition, which has caused great difficulties in the writing of this composition. It is difficult to write a convincing article because there are few words.
The countermeasures are: to know how to write argumentative papers, to have clear arguments in the papers and to write well the materials. Where the arguments come from, we should extract them from the given materials. Second, you should be able to extract ideas from materials. What can I do to master the method of refining ideas? First of all, read carefully and really understand the material in front of you. You must understand clearly what the given material says, discusses, explains, affirms, denies, praises, advocates, criticizes and opposes. This is the premise of refining your own views correctly. Then you can choose your own point of view from the materials through the analysis from the outside to the inside. This book selects some materials to demonstrate, and no examples are given here. Third, at the beginning of the composition, it is essential to quote the original text. The quotation should be concise and targeted, that is, it should obey the needs discussed below and serve the following ideas, and no matter how important it is, it should not be copied.
Mistake 5: There are only opinions+examples in the text.
The reasons for this error are: firstly, such candidates lack the basic knowledge of writing argumentative papers, which should have three elements: arguments, arguments and argumentation methods. Writing an argumentative essay should be convincing, relying on strong argumentation, not only setting facts, but also making sense, and argumentation should rely on appropriate argumentation methods. Secondly, such candidates do not understand the integrity of the composition structure, and the composition should be organically combined from content to form. That view+example is not an article.
The countermeasures are: candidates should first learn the basic knowledge of writing argumentative essays and how to write argumentative essays in order to achieve convincing results. It is necessary to write an argumentative essay with factual examples, but this alone is far from enough. We should also be reasonable, analyze and demonstrate with theoretical materials, and put facts on the basis of reasoning.
Mistake 6: Vague discussion
There are two kinds of so-called fuzzy discussions. First, after a short essay puts forward a point of view, the candidates discuss it around the point of view, and there are no examples in the whole essay. The other is that although there are facts in the composition, there are too many discussion parts, and my words are completely vague and pale. They don't know how to demonstrate and quote some theoretical materials, such as famous sayings, epigrams and ancient poems.
One of the reasons for this mistake may be that such candidates don't associate things, or because they don't have rich life experience and don't care much about things around them at ordinary times. Even if they associate, they can't associate with related things. One possibility is that they lack knowledge and don't read much. There is very little knowledge stored in my mind, so I can only talk about it without foundation when writing. Therefore, in addition to writing knowledge, a composition should also have a rich life and rich knowledge.
The countermeasures are as follows: First, we must realize that words are vague, especially the argument taken for granted in our own words is unconvincing and cannot achieve the purpose of argument and reasoning. Second, we should enrich our knowledge and accumulate some writing materials. Thirdly, we should care about the people and things happening around us and get information from different news media. In this way, there will be no "cooking without rice" when writing.
The seventh mistake: not connecting with reality.
The reasons for this mistake are: first of all, I don't know that the life of writing material composition lies in "feeling the reality" rather than moaning without illness. "Sense" is a spark of thought, which comes from the collision between the meaning of the materials read and the reality of social life. Without contact with reality, there would be no such "feeling". Secondly, I don't know the function of integrating with practice. Connecting with practice can show that the refined views are of universal significance and can be demonstrated by connecting with practice.
The countermeasure is: expand association according to the refined point of view. It can be linked to both personal reality and social reality. "Society" includes ancient and modern China and foreign countries. Contact should focus on the present, focus on the middle, and try to get in touch with current events. Touch current events naturally and appropriately. We must not be far-fetched, let alone forget ourselves. We should contact ourselves. From here, readers (commentators) can clearly see your outlook on life, personality charm and sense of responsibility for society and the country. Although this passage is not much, it is well written and incisive, which can express feelings and infect readers (commentators).
Mistake 8: The self-made question is too big.
The reason for this kind of mistake is that candidates will not use the opportunity of writing their own questions to create good conditions for writing. Although big questions can be made small, it is not easy to do them well in more than 500 words.
The countermeasure is: it is best to use argumentative questions and remember that half of the questions are well written.
Mistake 9: The mistake at the beginning of the composition.
Some articles start with the introduction, and then talk about the given materials. This kind of beginning is often irrelevant and irrelevant. I don't know that writing a composition for the material is to let you draw an argument based on the given material.
Cause of error: I was unclear when writing, or I was careless at the moment and didn't know the seriousness of the error at the beginning of the article.
The countermeasure is that it can be changed to: I read this material and realized …
Error 10: The argument (or topic) summarized according to the materials is incorrect.
Most of the reasons are caused by not reading the information.
The countermeasure is to realize that composition is an examination of comprehensive ability. Usually, we should pay more attention to reading articles and improve our reading ability, problem analysis and problem solving ability.
These are some mistakes that can't be made in the MBA entrance examination. I hope everyone can remember them. In the coming exam, everyone can give full play and pass the joint exam smoothly.