Application composition occupies a large proportion in the civil service examination, and it often becomes a headache for many candidates because of its high requirements, unique style, word limit and other factors. A few days before the exam, the teacher of Tuhua Education Examination Research Center summarized the writing points of the big composition for the candidates. In fact, the essence of the application is to ask candidates to analyze and solve the problems raised in the materials as simulated national civil servants. The language should conform to the special specifications and requirements of the application. Generally speaking, Shen Lun's great essays can be divided into four types, namely, critical essays, strategic essays, political essays and official essays. The writing of the first three has its own emphasis, some emphasize the reasons, and some emphasize the countermeasures. There are not many official documents in the national examination, but they cannot be ignored. Any practical essay consists of three parts: argument, argument and argument. We call it application three elements for short. Argument is your main point. There are general arguments and sub-arguments. The general argument is sometimes the topic of your composition, and the sub-argument is the angle to demonstrate the general argument. The principles of argumentation are integrity, identity, height, breadth and accuracy. Identity means that you want to be a national civil servant, and sometimes the title itself will stipulate the specific identity of the writer. Height means that the thesis should have a certain political height. At present, the general political height refers to Scientific Outlook on Development, ecological civilization and harmonious society. Breadth refers to an open mind when analyzing problems. Accuracy means that the position must be highly consistent with the state and the CPC Central Committee. Argument is the foundation of an argument, the material and basis to prove it, and the support of the article. There are generally two kinds. Factual argument and theoretical argument. Factual argument refers to data based on objective facts, such as statistical data, summarized facts, specific cases, etc. Classical works, theoretical documents, famous sayings and epigrams, scientific axioms, laws and other theoretical arguments. Argumentative writing is how to explain arguments with arguments. Generally, there are examples, citations, theoretical argumentation, comparative argumentation, reduction to absurdity and other methods. Generally speaking, the writing steps of practical writing are composed of eight links: first examining the topic, outlining, determining the topic, thinking about the beginning, writing the main points, thinking about the structure, demonstrating and writing the ending. First, examine the topic in detail, understand the purpose of the proposition, and examine whether the composition type needs specific strategies, comments, argumentations, official documents, speeches or others. Investigate the restrictive conditions, that is, the content of the discussion should focus on analyzing the reasons or emphasizing the countermeasures, figuring out who the virtual identity is, and asking for the word limit. The second outline is the basic idea of writing an article, drawing a sketch on the draft paper and making various arguments. Third, write a topic. Generally, there are positive legislation, anti-legislation and extension law. The so-called positive legislation is the title and argument, which should be advocated, such as "new ideas to ensure that' power is used by the people'". Anti-legislation is to question a wrong viewpoint or negative phenomenon, such as "don't lose sight of one thing while developing marine resources" and "beware of' saving the market' leading to the rise of local protectionism". Extension method, such as thinking caused by XX, inspiration from XX, hydropower development from Nujiang River, what XX tells us, etc. Fourth, the beginning. Explain the events, influences and viewpoints clearly from the beginning. The first layer, explain the origin of things, and get what happened at a certain time and place according to the materials, which is very specific. The second layer reveals the theme. It can be seen from this incident that a certain problem is quite serious, which is in line with our thinking habits. The third layer, talk about the influence or harm of a problem. Generally speaking, there are communication, quotation, metaphor, contrast and rhetoric. We can apply a universal beginning to the beginning. A, in recent years/at present/recently; () Frequent phenomena/situations/grim situations/causes/causes (). There are many reasons (). Therefore, we think () is urgent/should be put on the agenda/should be taken seriously ()/we must (). B, the situation/phenomenon has once again aroused the shock of the world/people's vigilance: () Faced with such a current situation, we can't help but feel deeply worried: Why are the problems still () Some people have an optimistic explanation: from the perspective of (), (); Judging from (), (). However, if we look at it from another angle and think deeply, what price have we paid? Those who have read the book also read: 1, on how officials read after the written test of Jilin public examination; 2. The connection and universality of Li Zuhua's basic knowledge, test, application and interview; 3. How to keep a secret about the 20 10 written examination of Shanghai civil servants; 4, 20 168. All civil servants must take a written test. 6.20 1 1. presents the first two groups of different volumes. 7.2009 National Civil Service Examination High Score Required Reading: Exam Raiders 8. In 2009, the essay on application: We should face up to the utilitarian values of officials. 9. Candidates are discussing the written test of Shanghai civil servants. "I didn't expect" line test "to be a little demon" 10.