(a) the central argument plus arguments. This is a very typical argumentative structure model, which is adopted by many famous articles, such as Ideal Ladder, Talking about Diligence, Talking about Bones and so on. The following is the structural outline of Say's "diligence": Central argument: "As the saying goes,' nothing is difficult if you put your mind to it.' Han Yu, a writer in the Tang Dynasty, said:' Hard-working people are so diligent.' Profound knowledge comes from diligence. "Sub-argument 1: Diligence produces results. Sub-argument 2: Diligence makes wisdom. This model is most suitable for fast writing in the college entrance examination room and the easiest to learn. Therefore, we regard it as the most important training. Pay attention to a few details when guiding. First of all, there must be arguments, not only central arguments, but also sub-arguments. The argument must be clearly expressed in one or a few sentences. Secondly, we should also pay attention to putting the argument in an appropriate and eye-catching position. The author puts forward the following requirements for students: the central argument is generally placed at the end of the first paragraph, and if the sentence is long, it can be put in a separate paragraph (the second paragraph); Sub-arguments are usually placed at the beginning of each paragraph. The refinement and expression of sub-arguments is the focus of guidance. 1, an argumentative essay should have at least two arguments, preferably three or four. 2. The language of sub-arguments should be concise and generally controlled within 15 words. 3, the structure of the argument sentence should be consistent, so that the middle paragraph constitutes a parallel or quasi-parallel paragraph. The above-mentioned standard text 1 and the argument in Qin Shuo are both subject-predicate structures. 4. The statement of sub-arguments should be as close as possible to the key words of the topic to ensure that each paragraph is deducted. The 1 sign quoted above is a good example. 5. Several sub-arguments try to focus on the three questions of "what", "why" and "how", and focus on solving one of them. For example, in the standard 1 quoted above, its two sub-arguments mainly solve the problem of "what" and say that "diligence" mainly solves the problem of "why", so as to ensure that the content is relatively concentrated. (2) Wonderful "three-thirds system" style. " "Three" is a wonderful number in literary works. There are countless such examples, such as Three Photographs of Home Village, Three Borrowing Banana Fans, Monkey King Thrice Defeats the Skeleton Demon, Sanyu, and Three Visits to Caotang. A short essay Zou Ji satirizes coachable, the king of Qi, can actually dig out six or seven "threes". Generally speaking, "two" is too detailed, "four" is too verbose, and "three" is just right, so it can have a solid and heavy feeling when used in discussion. Many successful argumentative essays are "three-thirds system". What is the "three-thirds system"? The "three-thirds system" summarized by the author is: the first three sentences put forward arguments, the main three paragraphs are the center of the argument, and three examples are used as arguments. Of course, the so-called "three-thirds system" is only a basic model and a basic requirement. For example, the main part, the basic requirements are at least three paragraphs, at least three examples. In the process of writing, students can make appropriate adjustments according to the actual situation, and the main body can be four paragraphs or even five or six paragraphs; Examples can be five, six or more, or three per paragraph. This can ensure the sufficiency and richness of arguments. Please see the following (National Volume 2002): Choice We seem to encounter things that need to be chosen every day. Choice is everywhere, all the time, and choosing the right path will affect people's life. Therefore, we must learn the choice of mentality. We should choose the truth. Remember the story of Bruno's martyrdom? Bruno was a famous materialist in16th century. He expounded and defended Heliocentrism of Copernicus, and proposed that the universe is infinite in time and space. His persistence aroused the strong dissatisfaction of the church at that time, and Bruno resolutely chose the truth in his personal life and his persistence in the truth. /kloc-in 0/600, Bruno was burned to death by religious figures in Rome Flower Square. Although Bruno died gloriously, sober people deeply know that his choice is correct. He made materialism respected and inherited in later generations and made contributions to scientific truth. We should choose the national interest. In the face of national and personal interests, Liu Hulan and Qiu persevered, sacrificed their lives for their country and made contributions to the liberation of new China. Luxun, a famous modern writer, decided to give up medicine and devote himself to literature in order to awaken those insensitive people in China. He knows that it is not enough to heal the patient's body, but mental patients are equally important. Lu Xun wrote Diary of a Madman, Medicine, Kong Yiji and other works, which exposed the cannibalism system in China feudal society, awakened millions of people and laid a solid foundation for the victory of new democracy. Lu Xun chose national interests and abandoned personal hobbies, but his choice was undoubtedly correct. We should choose a bright future. I remember a champion of the college entrance examination said: "In my reading career, I abandoned the ordinary and chose to study;" "Give up many games and choose to study; I gave up complacency and chose modesty. My success was achieved through choice! " We really must make the right choice for our future. Today, when science and technology are quite developed, it is the competition for talents, which requires us to set up lofty ideals, study scientific and cultural knowledge hard, resist all kinds of temptations, constantly practice ourselves, enrich ourselves, improve ourselves and strive for our bright future. Choice is so important that we should learn to choose our own heart, abandon things that hinder our development, keep a clear head, make the right choice and move towards a brilliant tomorrow. This excellent college entrance examination composition is a typical "three-thirds system" style, which gives people a clear and detailed analysis, enables the reviewers to master the author's writing ideas and thinking process in a short time, and at the same time gives people the feeling of heavy content and sufficient arguments. It's definitely a masterpiece of high scores. (3) the first paragraph of the six-paragraph comprehensive type: the meaning is clear at the beginning and the argument is put forward. Or quote, or metaphor, or parallelism, or comparison, in short, three sentences go straight to the point, and avoid mystifying, winding and dragging. The second paragraph: detailed case analysis, combining narration with discussion. Facts speak louder than words, and a good factual argument can often prove the argument forcefully. It is not easy to write detailed examples. Many students forget the genre characteristics of argumentative essays, and their descriptions are too detailed and should be avoided as much as possible. When the author instructs, let the students learn the sandwich structure, that is, the beginning and end are discussion and evaluation words, and the middle is a highly summarized narrative (generally no more than 120 words). The third paragraph: compare the examples slightly to form momentum. If a detailed example is the outline of a point, then a simple example is the extension of a surface. The combination of point and surface can form a three-dimensional sense, with three or four examples as the best. If we can form a pattern of ancient and modern China and foreign countries, it will be more comprehensive and representative. The fourth paragraph: positive and negative contrast, highlighting the center. That is to say, on the basis of the above detailed analysis and brief comparison, we can cut in from the opposite side, combine the positive and negative, and have a clear contrast, thus highlighting the center more. The fifth paragraph: dialectical analysis and comprehensive demonstration. Any theory is just a hypothesis, and the absolute conclusion is prone to deviation, so dialectical analysis can make the argument more rigorous and comprehensive. The sixth paragraph: link with reality and sublimate the theme. This paragraph is to highlight the practical pertinence of the article, connect with reality, solve problems, and further sublimate the theme. This mode is easy to master and operate, which is very suitable for composition in examination room. Because its advantages are obvious: clear thinking and strict logic; Six-step mode, interlocking, in one go, no suspicion of procrastination, so that the marking teacher can see at a glance; The argument is substantial and the argument is sufficient, which effectively overcomes the defect of empty content in argumentative writing. Let's take a look at the structure of the excellent composition "Get out of the old box and break through the forces of habit" (national volume 1988): the first paragraph, tracing back to the source, leads to habits: a thousand years of history, emphasizing habits. In the second paragraph, we will give an example for the first time. Habits are changeable: people are used to disco. In the third paragraph, three examples are cited to emphasize its harm: Edison, Wang Zhao and the ape-man. The fourth paragraph, dialectical analysis, points out the harm: lack of innovation, always backward. The fifth paragraph, break the habit? Be content with the status quo? Positive and negative contrast, sound the alarm. The sixth paragraph, linking with reality, is habitual; Call for breakthrough and renew potential. This article is defined as "Gan Kun" in six paragraphs, with clear thinking, distinct levels, sufficient and reasonable arguments, analysis and argumentation, which overcomes the common fault of "viewpoint+case = discussion" in argumentative writing and is worth learning. -Brother will make do with it.