"Guide every teacher to the road of happy scientific research" is the inculcation of the famous educator Suhomlinski to the principal. In the new century, schools should respond to fierce competition and strive to build a team of teachers who are good at education, teaching and scientific research, so that schools can embark on the road of sustainable development. (1) Carry forward teachers' morality and build an effective carrier for educating people. The gradual establishment and improvement of the municipal economic system has brought vigor and vitality to the construction of teachers, but it has also brought about some new problems. For example, some teachers engage in paid tutoring, sell goods to parents of students, accept gifts and cash gifts from parents of students, and so on. We should educate, guide, standardize and evaluate teachers' professional ethics and ideological quality by means of "learning, establishing, educating and evaluating". Learning is learning the theory and regulations of teachers' morality. First of all, organize teachers to study the Code of Professional Ethics for Primary and Secondary School Teachers. At the same time, combined with the implementation of the law popularization plan, teachers are organized to study educational laws and regulations and the Party's educational principles and policies, watch the special audio-visual film "Model Style", carry out reading activities of "Implementation Outline of Civic Moral Construction" and "Professional Ethics Standards for Primary and Secondary School Teachers", arrange school leaders to give lectures on teachers' morality and ethics, and clearly put forward that schools cannot introduce laws and regulations on equal exchange of market economy and cannot teach and educate people commercially. Help teachers to establish a correct world outlook and outlook on life, and enhance their dedication and dedication. At the same time, with the help of discussion and discussion, they can write their own experiences and vividly implement the education of teachers' morality. Establishment means establishing rules and requirements. According to the actual situation of the school, constantly improve and perfect the teachers' morality. Clearly stipulate that teachers should love their jobs and set an example; Be virtuous and be a teacher; Love students, persuasive; We should study our business and strive for perfection; We should be dignified, civilized and polite, make a public commitment to the society, not take part in dinner parties, not accept gifts and gifts from parents of students, not engage in paid tutoring, not sell goods to parents of students, and accept social supervision. Only iron discipline can have strong cohesion and appeal. A tree is to set an example, set an example. Carry out a series of activities such as "learning from others and creating excellent results", select advanced teachers and excellent class teachers, and publicize their deeds and spirit in time. Evaluation is to evaluate teachers' morality and style. Establish and improve the evaluation and reward mechanism of teachers' professional ethics, implement the one-vote veto system of teachers' professional ethics in the evaluation, employment and promotion of teachers' positions, establish an effective supervision mechanism of teachers' professional ethics, conduct extensive questionnaire surveys (parents and students), listen carefully to opinions and suggestions from all sides, actively improve their work, and strive to improve teachers' professional ethics. (2) Strengthen teachers' professional skills training and strive to improve teachers' professional ethics. 1. Guide teachers to learn and accept modern educational concepts. Through lectures and discussions, we will gradually strengthen our rational understanding and guide teachers to establish new educational concepts such as talent view, student view, teaching view and quality view, which are adapted to the development of modern society, and turn them into conscious educational behaviors. 2. Organize teachers to learn and master the necessary knowledge and ability of modern education. As a teacher in the new century, to have extensive knowledge and modern educational means, to adapt to modern education, we must have the knowledge and ability of modern education. Encourage teachers to participate in various training courses and cultivate all kinds of top talents. Organize teachers to participate in the training of new textbooks and new outlines. Pay attention to popularizing computer technology among young teachers, formulate a training plan for young and middle-aged teachers' computer ability, and stipulate that young and middle-aged teachers must be able to use computers so that teachers can master the basic operation methods as soon as possible. Do a good job in training key teachers and give full play to their leading role. Attach importance to the cultivation of young teachers. Do a good job of pairing new and old teachers with teachers. Sign a pairing contract to guide teachers to care about the object of instruction politically and ensure that the object of instruction has a good teaching style, diligent work style and correct work attitude. Developing teaching basic skills competition to improve comprehensive quality. The school carefully arranges personnel, funds, time and organization, and promotes the improvement of young teachers' professional level through professional training, forming an atmosphere of hard study. (3) Create an incentive environment and create an entrepreneurial group. To do a good job in school education and teaching, we must create a spiritual environment of striving for progress. Strive for progress needs encouragement, and we should use various occasions to publicize teachers' good atmosphere and advanced deeds. Prevention and treatment of campus injury accidents In recent years, campus student injury accidents are on the rise year by year. In the event of an injury accident on campus, not only the school itself and the family will bear great pain, but also the school and teachers will become "Tang monks' meat", which will easily be pushed to the dock and cause great pressure on the school. During the teaching period, students have an injury accident at school. Should the school be held responsible for these accidents or personal injury cases? How much responsibility do you have to bear? Why take responsibility? What are the rights and obligations between students and schools? The law does not make clear provisions, and the relevant judicial interpretation is not detailed. The existing laws lack a unified legal guarantee and an effective solution mechanism for dealing with campus injury accidents. What kind of legal and economic responsibilities should schools and teachers bear for campus injury accidents? China's existing law on the protection of minors, compulsory education law and teacher law have no exact and specific provisions. In August 2002, the Ministry of Education promulgated the Measures for Handling Students' Injury Accidents, which stipulated that schools should not assume guardianship responsibility for underage students, and stipulated the specific circumstances of the responsibility and non-responsibility of schools after students' injury accidents. However, as an administrative organ, it is appropriate for the Ministry of Education to stipulate who will bear civil liability and who will not. The promulgation of this "method" is like hitting a heavy stone with water, which makes the already heated dispute over the handling of student injury accidents even more calm. Combining with the cases actually tried by my court and referring to the results of handling such cases by foreign courts, this paper makes a qualitative discussion on the subject of responsibility and the principle of imputation of campus injury accidents. First, the definition and types of school injury accidents. School injury accident refers to an event in which students' bodies are violated during their study, life and activities at school, resulting in injury, disability, death or other intangible damage. It belongs to the category of general personal injury and is different from personal injury in society. School injury accidents have their own characteristics: first, the subject of injury is specific, and the victims can only be students studying and living in schools, including day students and boarders in public schools and private schools. Second, the damage location is specific, and the damage location of students must be in the school park and the specific place where the school organizes off-campus activities. Third, the destruction time is specific. The damage to students occurs during the study and life at school and during the make-up classes organized by the school, except during the non-study life when students leave school. Based on this, the author thinks that campus injury accidents can be divided into the following four categories: (1) injuries among students caused by sports, games or other reasons. The perpetrators and victims of such accidents are all students at school. This situation is more common. (two) due to corporal punishment of students by teachers or other school employees and other reasons, causing injuries to students. The perpetrators of such accidents are teachers or their staff responsible for education and management, and the victims are students at school. (three) personal injury accidents caused by the school's failure to fulfill the relevant obligations. The damage caused by such cases is the negative inaction of teachers and other school employees. (four) the accident caused personal injury to students. The characteristic of this kind of accidents is that the causes of students' personal injuries are not the teachers and classmates of the school, but some unexpected accidents. Second, the identification of the subject responsible for campus injury accidents is the premise of civil liability. To distinguish the subject of responsibility, we must first clarify the relationship between schools and students. The author thinks that the relationship between school and students is neither legal guardian nor ward, nor the transfer of guardianship responsibility, nor the entrusted education management. The reason why the guardianship relationship between schools and students is not applicable is not only the lack of legal basis, but also the negative effect in practice. According to the law, the guardian's duty is mainly to carry out civil legal acts on behalf of the ward; Protect the personal property and other lawful rights and interests of the ward; Educate and take care of the ward; Restrain the behavior of the ward, etc. The school is an institution whose main purpose is to impart cultural knowledge, and the school has no conditions to undertake all the duties of the guardian. The relationship of entrusted education management is the relationship of rights and obligations between equal civil subjects, and most educational institutions in China are state-run educational institutions. Moreover, according to the provisions of the Compulsory Education Law, it is the legal obligation of guardians of school-age children to the state, that is to say, the relationship between students and schools is not a voluntary entrusted education management relationship, but a legal education management relationship. The school is the legal teaching place of the country, and its main responsibility is to implement and manage teaching activities. Students registered in the school must obey the teaching management of the school. If the school infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of students in the process of teaching or management, it will of course bear legal responsibility. For the first kind of cases, we should decide whether the school should be the main body of responsibility according to the specific circumstances, rather than taking the school as the main body of responsibility. The subject of responsibility in such cases is the guardian of the offender first. Only when the school is at fault can the guardian's responsibility be appropriately reduced, and the school should bear the corresponding responsibility. For the second kind of cases, whether teachers and schools can be regarded as * * * co-defendants and required to bear civil liability for compensation is controversial in practice. One view is that teachers should not be listed as * * * co-defendants, on the grounds that teachers are performing their duties, and the responsibility should be entirely borne by the school. Another view is that teachers can be listed as * * * to participate in litigation with the defendant. The author agrees with the second opinion, because teachers' behavior should not be regarded as duty behavior at this time, and there is no such thing as corporal punishment in teachers' post authorization. The injury caused by teachers' corporal punishment on students is a direct infringer, while the school can be regarded as a joint infringer, and its infringement behavior is manifested in poor management of teachers. According to the law of our country, if two or more people jointly infringe and cause damage to others, they should bear joint and several liability, so schools and teachers should bear joint and several liability. There is also such a precedent in China's judicial practice, such as the case of personal injury dispute between Cui Mou, a student of the second senior middle school in Chaoyang City, Liaoning Province, and the defendant Xu and the school, which is a typical example. In the third kind of cases, the school should bear the responsibility as the main body of responsibility, which is basically uncontroversial in judicial practice, because the fault of the school is obvious in such cases. For the fourth kind of cases, the school generally does not bear the responsibility, because the cause of the accident is completely accidental, and the school can compensate the students for the corresponding economic losses according to the principle of fairness, instead of being liable for compensation. So at this time, the school is not the main body of responsibility. Thirdly, the application of the imputation principle in the handling of campus injury accidents is an extremely important issue in the law of damage compensation, the core of the theory of damage compensation and the basic criterion for handling compensation disputes. Therefore, it is of great significance for people's courts to correctly handle compensation cases and improve the level of judicial practice. According to the nature of the school and the relationship between the school and the students, the author will talk about the principle of liability for personal injury compensation cases of campus students. Article 160 of the Supreme People's Court's Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Implementation of the General Principles of Civil Law stipulates that "a mentally ill person who lives and studies in a kindergarten or school or is treated in a mental hospital without civil capacity is injured or causes damage to others, and the unit is at fault, these units can be ordered to give appropriate compensation." According to this regulation, the basic premise for the school to bear civil liability for personal injury compensation is that "the unit is at fault". The school only bears the liability for compensation if there is a fault, and there is no responsibility if there is no fault. Although fault presumption is essentially fault liability, its purpose is to strengthen the responsibility of infringers and provide better relief for victims. Based on the relationship between schools and students, there are differences in judicial practice whether the principle of presumption of fault liability can be applied in campus injury accidents. One view is that the school can apply this principle if a person without capacity causes damage or is illegally infringed, that is, if the school cannot prove that it is innocent, it should be liable for compensation. Another view is that the principle of presumption of fault liability cannot be applied to campus injury cases. The author agrees with the second opinion, because the relationship between schools and students is a legal educational management relationship. If this principle is applied, the responsibility of presumption of fault will increase the burden on the school, and the school will reduce various activities that may form responsibility, such as spring outing and doing experiments, which is not conducive to the implementation of various forms of teaching activities in the school. In fact, many schools have cancelled students' group activities. Therefore, it is necessary to introduce relevant laws and judicial interpretations, so that the principle of presumption of fault liability is not applicable to campus injury cases to guide judicial practice. The principle of no-fault is not applicable to the handling of campus injury accidents, which has been widely accepted, and the author does not need to discuss it here. (2) The principle of fair responsibility. Fair liability means that the people's court, based on the concept of fairness, takes into account the property status of the parties, and if both parties are not at fault for causing damage, both parties share the responsibility. Article 130 of China's General Principles of Civil Law stipulates that if the parties are not at fault for causing damage, they may share the responsibility according to the actual situation. This provision is an important legal basis of the principle of fairness. The "no fault" here means: first, the actor cannot be presumed to be at fault; Second, we can't find the wrong party; Third, determine the fault of one or both parties, obviously unfair. The following issues should be strictly grasped when applying the principle of fairness: (1) The scope of application of the principle of fairness is that neither party is at fault, and it is not a tort compensation case adjusted by the principle of no-fault liability. It is a kind of imputation principle chosen after the principle of no-fault liability cannot be applied. (2) The so-called "actual situation" refers to the economic situation of two or more parties, that is, the actual affordability. Others, such as social sympathy factors and how much the responsible subject fulfills his obligations, are all decided by the judge, but sharing is not a matter of fifty boards. (3) When making a judgment, the responsibility sharing should be fair and reasonable, and judges should not abuse their discretion. (4) Compensation for victims should be limited to direct losses, generally excluding indirect losses. When the school is responsible, it should apply the principle of fault liability and give consideration to the principle of fairness. In other words, only when the school is really at fault for the campus accident and the parties to the accident are not at fault can the economic losses be properly shared by the parties according to the principle of fairness. First of all, it should be clear that there is no relationship between the school and the students. According to the provisions of the Education Law and the Law on the Protection of Minors, although the responsibilities of schools to protect minors are similar to those of student guardians, the nature and legal sources of these two responsibilities are different. Parental guardianship is a special relationship between guardians and ward, while the relationship between schools and students is based on the relationship between education and being educated. Therefore, the school's responsibility to students is education, management and protection. In this case, as long as the school does its duty as an administrator and there is no fault in itself, it should not bear civil liability. According to article 160 of the Supreme People's Court's Opinions on Implementing the General Principles of Civil Law, some places in China have also promulgated and implemented the Regulations on Handling Injury Accidents of School Students. For example, the Shanghai Municipal People's Congress deliberated and passed the Regulations on Handling Injury Accidents of Primary and Secondary School Students in Shanghai, which made it clear that the principle of determining school responsibility is the principle of fault liability and the principle of fairness. If the law does not stipulate the additional obligations of the school, the school has no obligation to ensure the safety of students and other members of the school. In other words, the court does not want the school to be responsible for every student injury accident, but only requires the students to be responsible for the injuries caused by the school's intention or negligence. As a legal expert said, the school is not an absolutely safe insurer, nor is it absolutely responsible for all the injuries that happen to students. In normal teaching activities, schools should bear the responsibility unless they are at fault. For example, in physical education class, if the teacher places the equipment improperly, there are dangerous factors, the competitors are not properly matched, and the students are induced to engage in unprepared activities, and various sports activities are arranged under dangerous circumstances, the school should be deemed to be at fault. If the school and teachers take necessary preventive measures and fulfill the obligation of prompting, but the injury is caused by the students' own fault, the school can bear the responsibility or exempt part of the responsibility according to the degree of the students' fault. If an accident occurs in the process of experimental operation, students carry out dangerous chemical experiments, and in the process of giving students safety guidance, students engage in experiments without teachers' permission and are injured, they should be deemed to be at fault, and the school and teachers will not bear the responsibility without fault. Neither side is at fault for the accident that happened in the school, and the school generally does not bear the responsibility. Under special circumstances, according to the principle of fairness, it can be determined that the school compensates students for the corresponding economic losses, but it is only limited to direct losses and should not include indirect losses. The number of compensation cases caused by campus students' injuries is increasing day by day. However, due to the lack of clear legal provisions, different courts have different legal provisions in handling such cases in trial practice, and the results are not the same. There are many controversies in practice. So I suggest that this problem should be solved by legislation. Only in this way can we have laws to follow when dealing with similar problems and solve the contradictions between the parties better.