Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Argumentative argumentation method and its function
Argumentative argumentation method and its function
The argumentation methods and functions of argumentative essays are as follows:

1. Fact demonstration: Prove the argument with real, reliable and representative examples, specifically and forcefully prove the central argument, enhance the persuasiveness, interest and authority of the article, and make the article easy to understand.

2. Reasoning and argumentation: it is to prove the argument with incisive opinions in classic works, famous sayings and aphorisms of famous people at home and abroad, and recognized theorem formulas.

3. Comparative argument: short for positive and negative comparative argument, also known as comparative method. It is an argument method that compares and contrasts two things, deduces the difference between them, and sets off the conclusion.

4. Metaphorical argument: refers to the method of using metaphor to demonstrate analogy. As long as there are similarities between two things, one thing can be compared with another, thus demonstrating a more abstract thing. This is a special method of argument.

5. Analogy argument: it is an argument method that compares and analogizes a known thing (or example) with something (or example) that has certain characteristics with it to prove the argument.

6. Hypothetical argument: It is to assume the above things from the opposite side, and then infer the authenticity and reliability of the argument, so as to effectively demonstrate the central argument.

7. Causal argument: It is based on the regularity that objective things have this universal and inevitable causal relationship, and demonstrates the result by prompting the reasons. Causal arguments often appear in argumentative essays.