Your argument "1. Sharing is an ordinary action. 2. Sharing is a kind act. 3. Sharing is a great action. " These three arguments are actually an argument that "sharing is an action", so they are untenable. You can divide it into "1" like this. Sharing is an ordinary action. 2. Sharing is a kind character. 3. Sharing is a great soul. "That's probably it. . . . Communication, the same problem, can't all be friendship. " 1. Communication is a bridge of friendship. 2. Communication is the bond of success. 3.。 . . "Your two arguments" Communication is the bridge of friendship "and" No communication is the graveyard of friendship "must not be said in both sides. This is just an argument. You can write a random number, not to mention the pros and cons. This is probably what I hope to adopt.