This exam is not difficult, but it is very practical. The questions are mainly multiple-choice questions and big questions, and there is no need to endorse them at all (except those formulas). It's easier if you've been editing for a while. If you haven't entered the role, it will be more troublesome. Multiple choice questions are generally not difficult. As long as you read the book carefully several times and understand it all, it will be easy to choose. There are the following big problems:
1, calculation cost, manuscript fee, etc. This is definitely a test. At least one or two questions, you have to memorize the formula and the relevant provisions of the copyright law, and you have to be careful when doing it, because calculating the cost and manuscript fee is the basic skill in the publishing industry.
2. Review the questions and give you a passage to read according to the standards of editing or proofreading. Note that editing and proofreading are different. There is no way to review this. Remember the standardized symbols, and the rest depends on your own basic skills.
3. When asking questions, you will generally judge whether it is right or wrong and explain the reasons. In fact, this test is your familiarity with publishing norms, publishing processes and related laws and regulations. You don't need to recite, just express the relevant meaning in your own language. There will also be a report asking you to write a topic, or an audit opinion, which is very practical.
My suggestion is that you'd better look at the real questions and know how to take the exam. It's not difficult to review. At the time of the exam, we all reviewed for a week before the exam, so it was not too difficult.
(2) Excuse me, are proofreading symbols used to correct mistakes in short articles and sentences in publishing professional examinations? Did you do it according to the requirements of editing? Ask experts to answer.
I used proofreading symbols directly when I took the elementary exam. No problem, I passed. I hope to adopt.
(3) What questions have been changed or deducted in the publishing professional examination?
Publishing professional exam won't deduct points, right? This is not an editing contest.
(4) If the proofreading and editing questions are corrected incorrectly, will they be deducted?
No deduction
⑤ How to pass the publishing examination easily?
The following reply is a real answer from a netizen. I hope it helps you!
This exam is not difficult, but it is very practical. The questions are mainly multiple-choice questions and big questions, and there is no need to endorse them at all (except those formulas). It's easier if you've been editing for a while. If you haven't entered the role, it will be more troublesome. Multiple choice questions are generally not difficult. As long as you read the book carefully several times and understand it all, it will be easy to choose. There are the following big problems:
1, calculation cost, manuscript fee, etc. This is definitely a test. At least one or two questions, you have to memorize the formula and the relevant provisions of the copyright law, and you have to be careful when doing it, because calculating the cost and manuscript fee is the basic skill in the publishing industry.
2. Review the questions and give you a passage to read according to the standards of editing or proofreading. Note that editing and proofreading are different. There is no way to review this. Remember the standardized symbols, and the rest depends on your own basic skills.
3. When asking questions, you will generally judge whether it is right or wrong and explain the reasons. In fact, this test is your familiarity with publishing norms, publishing processes and related laws and regulations. You don't need to recite, just express the relevant meaning in your own language. There will also be a report asking you to write a topic, or an audit opinion, which is very practical.
My suggestion is that you'd better look at the real questions and know how to take the exam. It's not difficult to review. At the time of the exam, we all reviewed for a week before the exam, so it was not too difficult.
⑥ Editing, processing and examining questions in publishing professional examination.
1. We should not only correct all kinds of mistakes, but also make up for gaps and omissions, and also polish the text.
2. Alteration cannot change the theme of the manuscript.
3. You must follow the operation specification of manuscript processing.
4. Direct modification, and the use of proofreading symbols is prohibited.
⑦ Publish the answer format of comprehensive examination questions for professional and technical personnel's professional qualification examination.
To "correct the wrong questions", first, you need to know where the mistakes are, which requires a good language and writing skills; The second is to know how to correct it, because it is required to correct it on the test paper, so you should be familiar with the use of error correction symbols.
(eight) issued professional qualification examination questions.
Basic knowledge of publishing, review questions of publishing theory and practice, editing and processing questions, and proofreading questions.
In 2009, the classification degree of the subjective questions of the national publishing vocational qualification examination will be more obvious, and the way of correcting the three questions will become an important score.
Correct mistakes and proofread questions without scoring, and correct mistakes and deduct points; There will be no language errors in the theme materials; The intellectual errors in textbooks focus on publishing professional knowledge.
There are intellectual errors, language errors and logical errors in editing the materials selected for processing questions; No typographical errors; The intellectual errors in textbooks focus on publishing professional knowledge.
Proofreading questions generally give proof materials, and there is no intellectual error in the materials; There are a lot of language errors and typesetting errors unique to proofreading questions, such as blank words, indentation, line break, etc. The ability to use proofreading symbols is also one of the important test sites, for example, points will be deducted if you don't mark them outside the center of the edition.
In addition to the proof materials for proofreading questions and the tutorial for editing and processing questions in Elementary Basis, the review of other subjects and the intellectual errors in editing and processing questions are all in the tutorial, but not limited to chapters. The examination scope of these three types of questions still follows: the primary is limited to the content in the primary counseling textbook, the intermediate covers the primary content, and the basic knowledge can cover the content of theory and practice.
Computational problem
In 2009, the calculation questions in the subjective questions of the national publishing vocational qualification examination often cover the primary content of the intermediate level. For example, the calculation of the cover paper of primary textbooks is more complicated and needs to be understood by intermediate candidates. In addition, when calculating the stamp cost, candidates often miss the calculation of the addition and release rate, and often miss the cost of surface finishing.
Case analysis problem
In 2009, we should pay attention not to copy too many questions on the test paper, which will affect the scores of teachers and candidates.
Writing problem
The most important thing to pay attention to is not to reveal the true information of candidates, otherwise the exam will be invalid.
Pet-name ruby paper review process after submission?
After the paper is written, it must be submitted to journals and magazines for publication. At this time, the paper must be reviewed before deciding whether it is suitable for publication. Diary. Com tells you that the review cycle of papers is different, and the review time of core journals is the longest. After the paper is written, it must be submitted to journals and magazines for publication. At this time, the paper must be reviewed before deciding whether it is suitable for publication. Diary. Com tells you that the review cycle of papers is different, and the review time of core journals is the longest, about 3-6 months, and it may be delayed for other reasons. General journals at the national or provincial level generally take about one week, while the review time for other journals generally takes one month. Most people are not familiar with the system and process of peer review, but only know why. According to the journal network, the process of reviewing papers is generally: preliminary review, expert review and finalization. Among them, the preliminary review is carried out by the internal editors of journals and magazines, and it can only enter the expert review after passing, and then it can be reviewed by the editor-in-chief before it can be released. This shows the rigor of manuscript review. The preliminary examination of periodicals and magazines is the basic screening. Generally, papers without major problems can pass, and the review mainly depends on expert review. In fact, every professional journal (or academic journal) has an editorial board in its editorial department. The director of the editorial board is generally an expert and scholar who has a certain reputation in the industry (or specialty). The principle for editors to choose reviewers is firstly the experience and education level of experts, especially the experience of experts. Secondly, it is the serious and responsible attitude of experts to peer review. Third, it is the peer review level of experts. Of course, the reviewer's academic qualifications and experience are different, and the review conclusion of a paper will be different. However, different angles of experts' reviewing manuscripts will lead to highly different evaluations of manuscripts. As an expert and scholar in a certain industry, you should have a comprehensive understanding of the academic trends and technical level of your major. The expert review mainly examines the contents of the paper, such as whether the viewpoints of the paper are correct, whether the principles, formulas, derivation processes and conclusions adopted are correct, whether the experimental data are different from foreign literature, and whether the references are up-to-date. To some extent, expert peer review is a correct evaluation of the academic level, technical level, innovation and advancement of the paper. When reviewing manuscripts, experts must conduct a comprehensive and detailed review of the contents reflected in academic papers, such as arguments, experimental processes, results and discussions, conclusions, etc. Experts should calm down, think seriously and rationally about different academic viewpoints and arguments, give correct and appropriate evaluation to the paper, and never speculate on the academic value of the paper. The specific method is as follows: 1. Political censorship. Politically, it mainly investigates eight aspects: national territory and * * * issues; National dignity; Party's principles and policies; Foreign-related issues; Religious issues; Historical issues; Confidentiality issues; Other political issues. 2. Innovative comments. Innovation mainly refers to the new contribution of papers to human knowledge, technology or thought. The analysis methods and approaches are roughly as follows: 3. Source analysis of the paper: the fund subject is strictly approved and the funds are sufficient, so its paper may be more innovative. 4. Author information analysis: The quality of new works by recognized high-level authors may be good, because the research is inherited, and the quality of papers is positively related to the quality of authors. 6. Analysis: Papers with clear and novel topics, complete experimental process and data, fully typical arguments, rigorous arguments and clear conclusions are generally more innovative. After reviewing the papers, many papers need to be revised, and each article is typed back for its own reasons. As an author, when receiving the opinions of reviewers, we should first straighten our minds and keep calm. This is to be done: 1. All questions should be answered one by one; 2. Try to satisfy the experiments that need to be supplemented in the opinions; 3. Don't avoid what you can't meet, and explain reasonable reasons for what you can't do; 4。 For those who disagree, we should also answer tactfully and skillfully, so as to be well-founded; 5. Literature recommended by reviewers must be cited and discussed.
Attending will the previous real questions be used in publishing the intermediate review questions of professional foundation?
The basic knowledge of publishing specialty and the theory and practice of publishing specialty have the same questions and scores at the primary and intermediate levels, including the following three categories. (1) Multiple choice questions: **30 questions, each question 1 point. (2) Multiple choice questions: **35 questions, with 2 points for each question. (3) Comprehensive questions: **5 questions, with a total score of 100; Including editing and processing questions, proofreading questions, peer review questions, short answer questions, calculation questions, writing questions and other questions. 20 10 in order to be closer to the publishing practice and the examinee's reality, a multiple-choice question was set up in the comprehensive question of the intermediate "Publishing Professional Theory and Practice" examination subject.