Educational research papers must expound their own views, which is the most important place for writing educational research papers and the value of the article.
I don't want to explain the characteristics, styles and writing skills of educational research papers in theory, which can be seen everywhere in newspapers, magazines and the Internet. I just want to talk about my own writing experience and my feelings of participating in the evaluation of papers at all levels.
First, we must feel something.
This is actually a question of what to write in a scientific research paper. At present, there is a phenomenon, that is, to evaluate Excellence and professional titles, so teachers just remember to write papers, but the content is not their own feelings in education and teaching and their own research results. For example, treating the popular theory as a "hat" and then putting some practical examples on it will lead to several situations: one is that the "hat" is too big and appears top-heavy; Another situation is that the "hat" is too small, giving people the feeling that it can't be covered; Then I put on the wrong "hat" and became arrogant. Of course, papers downloaded from the Internet or cut and pasted from newspapers and magazines are not scientific research papers. When writing a paper, you should feel something, that is to say, the content of the paper should be your inner feelings in education and teaching, educational theory, teaching behavior, and the truth you really feel in practice, which can be experience or lessons.
Second, we must sublimate.
Scientific research papers are different from work summaries.
It is necessary to raise the perceptual things to the theoretical level for analysis, draw scientific conclusions, analyze educational phenomena and problems by using modern educational theories, and get something with universal guiding significance and regularity. If you just list some practices in your own teaching without theoretical analysis, it can't be regarded as a scientific research paper. However, some articles also want to do theoretical analysis, but the theory is divorced from practice, resulting in the phenomenon of "oil-water separation". The sublimation of a paper is not a pile of theories and concepts, nor is it an example of the title of a certain theory.
Third, we must innovate.
The paper is an article that reflects one's new viewpoints and new explorations, and it is an exposition of unsolved problems, and it is discussed with new viewpoints and new methods to seek new solutions. Innovation is a main thread that runs through educational papers. On the one hand, it is to explore solutions to new problems, such as exploring the development trend of current education reform, exploring the laws of education and teaching that have not yet been mastered in the field of education, and exploring what education and teaching will look like in the future. On the other hand, explore new argumentation angles and new methods to solve old problems. In addition, it is also an innovation to analyze and study the practical problems exposed in practical work and summarize the research results. Educational research papers should reflect the author's distinct views, rather than picking up the wisdom of others and repeating other people's views. Otherwise, the value of scientific research papers will be lost.
Fourth, we must demonstrate.
A paper must first have an argument, and then discuss it around it, that is, an argument. Some authors are not clear about the viewpoints to be expounded in the article, and do not know from which aspects to discuss the viewpoints of the article, or the arguments are not unified, or the logical relationship of the arguments is chaotic. The reason for this phenomenon is that the author has not thoroughly analyzed his own arguments, and the logical relationship between arguments has not been clarified at all. After reading such an article, he felt unclear about what the author wanted to explain. Therefore, after determining the argument of an article, we must make further analysis around the argument and then determine the argument. Analyze the logical relationship between arguments and arguments, and also analyze the logical relationship between arguments, and whether arguments can fully, typically and powerfully expound opinions. Therefore, the process of expounding opinions in the paper should be systematic, complete and coherent, rigorous and logical. In short, you should be able to "justify yourself".
Fifth, a choice must be made.
After all, the capacity of a paper is limited, and different essay-writing activities have different word requirements, most of which are thousands of words. Therefore, if you want to clarify your point of view clearly in thousands of words, you must screen, sort out and summarize the relevant materials and materials, and select the most essential materials that can best represent the author's point of view. First of all, theories and materials that are far away from this article will be abandoned. Some articles often put a large paragraph of rhetoric, theories and famous sayings at the beginning of the article, and then talk about the topic bit by bit from a large scope. As a result, more than half of the article still doesn't know what the author is going to say. It seems that this is the way to show the depth of the article, and therefore a large number of "junk words" have appeared. Secondly, the examples cited in the article should be summative and can be stated in the most refined language, avoiding "novel-style" statements. I think the emergence of this style of writing is due to the lack of space, the lack of "real goods" and the bad style of pretending to be "profound"
A good article does not lie in how standard the format is, how perfect the structure is, nor in how many gorgeous words and fashionable words there are, but in how much valuable information it provides to readers, that is, whether it provides readers with experiences and lessons to learn from.