Before talking about the gold content, tell a story first. I remember reading an impressive post in 2002. At that time, a college student complained that it was difficult for graduates who had just expanded their undergraduate enrollment (1997) to find jobs when they entered the job market.

This poster is from Yunnan. After finishing college in a first-tier city, he hopes to go back to his hometown for employment, but he does not want to take an examination of civil servants and state-owned enterprises within the system. At that time, college students were not included in the distribution system for several years, and few undergraduates entered the job market to find jobs, let alone places like Yunnan. So when I went to a local company for an interview, there was this conversation:

"Are you a college student? College students in Beijing?

be

You know, the kind of college students who passed the college entrance examination, got the admission notice and lived in school for four years?

be

However, all the students we recruited before were local technical secondary schools and junior college students, but undergraduates did not recruit. Please go back and wait for our notice! "

At that time, the post owner experienced many interviews in this style, and there was no OFFER once, which made him have deep doubts about himself. Is this university wrong?

So in this story, can it be explained that the gold content of the undergraduate diploma at that time was not as good as that of the local secondary school? Of course not. I can only say that the environment and situation at that time were more suitable for technical secondary school and junior college students. But the employment of college graduates is more concentrated in first-and second-tier cities. If the post owner insists on going back to Yunnan to find a job, naturally he will run into a wall everywhere.

So this leads to Sponge Jun's point of view: it is not so much gold content as applicability!

However, the information given by the subjects is too little, and different information such as where to work, what industry to engage in, and how old you are may have different answers, so the value of on-the-job MBA to the subjects is another matter.

However, there are some sexual problems that need attention. The so-called network of MBA is not how many people you know, but how many people want to know you. This is the actual situation of MBA and the correct view of contacts. The same is true of resources. Some school-enterprise resources must have reached your ability before they can be accepted.

Of course, apart from contacts and resources, what are the values of an on-the-job MBA? Let's not talk about management ability and thinking logic. To add here, this question should be 16 years ago. Now, MBA is taking the management entrance exam on June 5438+02, with both on-the-job and full-time degrees.

As long as you are looking for a job, or when you are promoted by rating, if the other company has a talent file, education is an unavoidable problem. On-the-job MBA is a plus, but as for how many points to add, it depends on whether it is a prestigious school or 985/2 1 1, double-class, etc.

In short, the cost of MBA tuition and time is very high. I sincerely hope that everyone can be admitted to the most cost-effective graduate students.

The code word is not easy, remember to like it ~