The writing essentials of conclusions and suggestions are: the conclusion is a brief summary of the results on the basis of analysis and discussion (be careful not to repeat the results too much, otherwise it will be the results, not the conclusions), which is the value of the article.
The conclusion should be a theoretical summary based on the results, and it is appropriate to summarize it in one sentence. His direct function is to acquire new knowledge and new theories, or to revise old knowledge and old theories. The task of conclusion is to express creative, instructive and empirical results through strict logical reasoning on the basis of theoretical analysis and experimental verification. It also embodies the value of papers or research results with its own order, clarity and objectivity. The conclusion echoes the introduction and, like the abstract, can provide a basis for readers and authors of secondary literature. The content of the conclusion is not a simple repetition of the research results, but a deeper understanding of the research results. It is a new general view from the whole content of the text and a part of the introduction through the process of judgment, induction and reasoning. Mainly includes:
(1) What problems did the results of this study explain, what laws were drawn, and what theoretical or practical problems were solved; To summarize the innovative content of the paper, the wording should be accurate and rigorous, and it should not be ambiguous or ambiguous. Don't use words like "probably", "probably" and "probably", so as not to make people feel specious and doubt the true value of the paper.
(2) What tests have been made on the previous views on related issues, which are consistent with the results of this study and which are inconsistent, and what amendments, supplements, developments or negatives have been made by the author.
(3) The shortcomings or problems left by this study. If there are any exceptions or problems that are difficult to explain or solve in this paper, some suggestions can be made for further research on this topic.
For the "conclusion" of a paper, the above points (1) are necessary, while (2) and (3) may or may not be available, depending on the specific content of the paper; If no conclusion can be reached, necessary discussions can be held without reaching a conclusion.
Conclusion The paragraphs are relatively independent and should provide clear and specific qualitative and quantitative information. The main points should be expressed concretely, not in abstract and general language. Readability is strong, for example, generally do not use symbols, use names. Write briefly, don't have more discussion, and don't simply repeat the abstract of each paragraph in the paper.
The real value of research results or papers is reflected by specific "conclusions", so it is not appropriate to use such expressions as "this research has advanced international level", "this research is the first in China" and "this research fills the domestic gap" in the conclusion paragraph for self-evaluation.
So, to sum up, the conclusion of the paper is also necessary:
(1) The language should be highly refined, the wording should be rigorous, and the words should be clear and specific.
(2) Core subjects with outstanding achievements.
(3) No more points, no long sentences, generally about 3.
Suggestions should also be clear and precise, and should not be vague, absent and never fabricated.
Where's Fan Wen? I found such a simple article for your reference only. If you don't understand anything, consult a professional! Good luck! !