1. originality: this is the primary criterion for evaluating any academic paper. The content of the paper must be the author's own research results, and can't copy others' achievements.
2. Scientificality: The research methods, experimental design and data analysis of the paper must be rigorous and conform to the norms of scientific research.
3. Practicality: The research results of this paper should have certain practical value, which can provide solutions to practical problems or provide reference for follow-up research.
4. Readability: the language of the paper is clear and the logical structure is rigorous, which is convenient for readers to understand and quote.
5. Influence: The research results of the paper should have certain academic influence and can attract the attention and discussion of peers.
6. Impact factors of journals: The impact factors of journals are important indicators to measure the quality of journals, and papers published in journals with high impact factors are usually considered to have high academic value.
7. Number of citations of papers: The number of citations of papers is also an important indicator to measure the influence of papers. The more citations, the more attention will be paid to the research results of the paper.
8. Innovation of the paper: Whether the paper puts forward new theories, new methods or new discoveries is also an important criterion for evaluating the paper.
Generally speaking, the evaluation criteria of SCI papers are varied, including not only the quality of the papers themselves, but also the publishing environment and influence of the papers.