Liu Xie said in "Wen Xin Diao Long" that "salary can be judged". The word "analysis" here emphasizes multi-angle analysis when writing argumentative papers.
The original meaning of "analysis" is to cut wood with an axe. Writing an argumentative essay is like chopping wood with an axe. Only by "dividing" and "analyzing" can we get to the point. The original meaning of "reason" is "treating jade", and later it is extended to "texture, organization and reason". "Breaking" means "breaking" and "analyzing" along the wood grain, thus revealing the truth. Source: www.examda.com.
Everything is made up of many elements, which constitute the characteristics of things. These features can be decomposed into several different edges in the horizontal direction and different levels in the vertical direction. Only by accurately grasping these aspects and levels can we grasp the characteristics of things and have a comprehensive and accurate understanding of things, so that the discussion can be extensive and in-depth. The choice of arguments in argumentative writing is usually related to grasping the side and level of things. Therefore, the key to multi-angle discussion is to accurately understand and grasp all important aspects and levels of things and discuss them separately, so as to discuss the central argument or theme comprehensively and profoundly.
The above is the theoretical basis of the "central argument decomposition theory" in argumentative writing. The theory of "central argument decomposition" means that when the central argument is determined, it often needs to be decomposed into several sub-arguments, and then discussed one by one. The "decomposition" here is the decomposition of the elements (all aspects and levels) that make up things; The "several arguments" here are various elements that make up things. The theory of "central argument decomposition" is the basic method of multi-angle discussion in argumentative writing. Source: www.examda.com.
For example, in Mao Zedong's article "Transforming Our Learning", in order to profoundly demonstrate the central argument that "I advocate transforming the learning method and learning system of our whole party", we first prove the significance of transforming our learning from the revolutionary practice of China's * * * production party for twenty years ("our party's childhood", "War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression period" and "now"), and then conduct a horizontal discussion. This paper discusses it from three aspects: research status, research history and drawing lessons from international revolutionary experience. Then it makes a horizontal comparison between the attitude of subjectivism and that of Marxism–Leninism. Finally, we discuss how to reform our study vertically. It is this multi-angle discussion that makes the discussion irrefutable. Source: www.examda.com.
Therefore, learning to "decompose" the central argument is the most basic way to write an argumentative essay. It is this kind of "analysis" and "reason" that makes the central argument move from generalization to concreteness and from phenomenon to essence, thus making people have a comprehensive, accurate and profound understanding of things.
I like multi-angle narration and explanation, and pay attention to the appropriateness, clarity and novelty of the angle when using multi-angle discussion; When choosing a certain angle to demonstrate the central argument, writing should keep the consistency of the angle. Otherwise, the angle of view is chaotic and disorganized, which leads to the failure of argument.