Comments on the excellent thesis defense of 1:
Can fully complete the contents and requirements stipulated in the graduation design task book; Be able to flexibly use the theoretical knowledge learned to solve the problems in design, and have original opinions; Strong ability to work independently (refer to literature, investigate and study, collect data on site, make design plans, etc.). ), reasonable design, correct calculation result, clear chart, accurate expression, systematic paper, strict logic, fluent writing and concise text; Answer questions clearly and correctly in your defense.
Good:
Able to complete the contents and requirements specified in the graduation design task book; Be able to use the theoretical knowledge learned to solve problems in design; Have the ability to work independently (refer to literature, investigate and study, collect data on the spot, make design plans, etc.). ), the design is reasonable, the calculation result is basically correct, the chart is clear, the expression is basically accurate and organized; Answering questions in the reply is basically correct.
Medium:
Able to complete the contents and requirements specified in the graduation design task book; Poor ability to use theoretical knowledge to solve design problems; Ability to work independently (refer to literature, investigate and study, collect data on site, make design plan, etc.). ) weak, the design of the main parts is basically reasonable, the calculation results are not wrong in principle, and the charts and papers basically meet the requirements; There is no principled error in answering questions in the reply.
By:
Can basically complete the contents and requirements stipulated in the graduation design task book; Poor ability to use theoretical knowledge to solve design problems; Ability to work independently (refer to literature, investigate and study, collect data on site, make design plan, etc.). ) is weak, the design of the main parts is basically reasonable, the calculation results are not obviously wrong, and the charts and papers meet the basic requirements; There is no principled error in answering questions in the reply.
Failure:
Unable to complete the contents and requirements specified in the graduation design task book; Can't use theoretical knowledge to solve problems in design; Poor ability to work independently (refer to literature, investigate and study, collect data on site, make design plans, etc.). ), the design is unreasonable, the basic concepts are unclear, there are major errors in the calculation results, and the charts and papers cannot meet the basic requirements; There is a principled error in answering the question in the reply.
Comment on thesis defense 2 1. The topic of this paper conforms to the professional training goal and can achieve the comprehensive training goal. The topic is difficult and the workload is heavy. The topic selection has high academic research (reference) value (great practical guiding significance). The student has a strong ability to consult documents, collect information about the examination system comprehensively, and have a strong ability to comprehensively use knowledge. The length of the article fully conforms to the requirements of the college, with complete content, scientific hierarchical structure, prominent points, clear logical relationship and certain personal opinions. The topics are completely consistent, the arguments are prominent, and the discussion is closely related to the theme. The language expression is fluent, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification; Rich references and strong timeliness; There is no plagiarism.
2. This research has strong practical value and provides a new basis. The author has clear thinking, rigorous discussion process, reasonable analysis and practical results. The writing of the thesis is standardized and the sentences are fluent, which meets the requirements of academic proofreading of dissertations.
3. The topic of this paper has strong application value, and the literature is collected in detail, and the knowledge learned is used comprehensively to solve the problem. The data obtained are reasonable, the conclusion is correct and there are innovative opinions. In addition, the format of the paper is correct, the text is standardized, the organization is clear and the language is fluent. The paper can be submitted on time, and after careful revision, it meets the requirements of undergraduate graduation thesis.
4. This student's thesis conforms to the current reality, which has certain theoretical value and practical significance, but it is not reasonable enough in structure. I hope I can revise and agree to open the topic.
5. Wang Rui's thesis "Electronic Password Lock Based on FPGA Technology" has completed the research (design) task specified in the task book. Using EDA technology, the digital password lock is designed by top-down design method. The overall structure, main functions, design flow, module division and VHDL source program of each module of the digital password lock are described, and the simulation results of digital password lock design are given. The translation of foreign language materials is acceptable, the paper format is basically standardized, the discussion is basically accurate, the expected requirements are met, and the requirements for the defense of bachelor's degree thesis are met.
Thesis defense comments 3 excellent:
Students can skillfully and concisely state the main contents of the paper within the specified time, and respond quickly, clearly and accurately when answering questions. After full discussion, the defense team agreed to evaluate the papers as excellent according to the quality of the students' papers and their performance in defense.
Good:
Students can explain the main contents of the paper fluently and clearly within the specified time, and can answer questions related to the paper properly. After full discussion, the defense team agreed to evaluate the paper as good according to the quality of the student's paper and the performance in the defense.
Medium:
Students can describe the main contents of the paper within the specified time, and can generally answer the questions raised, without principled mistakes. After full discussion, according to the quality of students' papers and their performance in defense, the defense team agreed to evaluate the papers as medium.
By:
Students can state the main contents of the paper within the specified time, but the organization is not clear enough and the answers to some main questions are not appropriate enough, but they can make supplementary explanations after being prompted. After full discussion, the defense team agreed to evaluate the paper score as passing according to the quality of the students' papers and their performance in defense.