Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - How many structural modes are there in argumentative writing?
How many structural modes are there in argumentative writing?
Argumentative writing generally has four structures-parallel, progressive, positive and negative contrast and total score.

The standard model of argumentative paragraphs: viewpoint+material+analysis+summary

Four paragraphs and twelve sentences, a perfect composition is completed!

Central argument+sub-argument.

Central argument+three links (connecting history, reality and self)+ending

& lt 1 & gt; Total score formula

First put forward your own point of view, that is, argument, then analyze and demonstrate, and finally draw a conclusion. This structure is discussed in the order of putting forward problems and analyzing problems (such as causes and hazards). ) and solve problems.

& lt2> parallel connection

note:

1. The central argument is usually placed at the end of the first paragraph. If the sentence is long, you can also put a separate paragraph (the second paragraph); Sub-arguments are usually placed at the beginning of each paragraph.

2. The language of sub-arguments should be concise and generally controlled within 15 words.

3. An argumentative essay should have at least two sub-arguments, preferably three or four.

4. The structure of sub-argument sentences should be consistent, so that the middle paragraphs constitute parallel or quasi-parallel paragraphs.

5. The statement of sub-arguments should be as close as possible to the key words of the topic (topic) to ensure that each paragraph will be deducted.

& lt3> step by step formula

It is used to prove that the relationship between several levels of views is gradual and in-depth. Its characteristics are: asking questions-analyzing problems-solving problems, that is, the framework of "what to do-why to do it".

Mode: pendulum phenomenon-analyzing essence-pointing out harm-finding reasons

& lt4> Contrast (photo)

The level used to prove the argument is the opposite. It is to compare two things or viewpoints in argument, or to compare another thing or viewpoint with another thing or viewpoint; Or use another thing or idea to set off a thing or idea.

Introduce: present an argument.