Interference factors are often set in the test questions: (1) increase or decrease and amplification, that is, changing the sentences of the original text, and expanding or narrowing the scope of explanation by adding some words or reducing some words. (2) To confuse the false with the true is to replace the correct with specious words or sentences, resulting in different meanings. (3) Upset-down refers to intentionally disrupting the sentence relationship of the original text when setting options, making it difficult to understand, such as reversing the causal relationship and disrupting the order. (4) out of nothing, that is, using the thinking inertia of candidates, inducing candidates to take it for granted rather than sober rational thinking.
In the process of solving problems, there is a jingle: "read the original text first, get the general idea, then read the stem as a mark, find out the corresponding sentences in the range, compare the options and see the differences."
Read the original text first and complete three tasks: (1) Understand the general idea of the article, that is, the object of explanation, the relationship between paragraphs, the author's point of view and related materials. (2) Number the paragraphs. (3) Mark important sentences and keywords.
Secondly, it is very important to read the stem, and we should mark the important words. For example, the title 1 of the volume 1999 can be marked as follows: "The first paragraph of this article puts forward a hypothesis, and the incorrect understanding is" 3. The first is the position of the proposition point, the second is the content of the test question, and the third is the standard for choosing the answer.
Third, finding out the scope of the answer and the corresponding sentence is the essential stage of the answer. Generally speaking, the search interval of the answer should be near the propositional point, for example, the answer to question 1 is in paragraph 1 or paragraph 2. It is more important to find the corresponding sentence. It can be said that if you find the corresponding sentence, you will basically find the answer. Comparing options to find differences is the last step, which is to complete the answer. For example, 1 item b says: "Compared with humans, hibernating mammals have changed in a wider range." The word "supervision" is omitted, which is inconsistent with the original intention of the article.
Explanatory reading questions are multiple-choice questions, and there are three ways to choose the right options: direct election, exclusion and analogy.
Direct election means choosing the right answer directly. This method is suitable for obvious questions, and some answers can be determined at once. It also applies to "choosing non-topics", such as "incorrect" and "not in line with the text".
Exclusion can be applied to all types of multiple-choice questions. It reveals the correct answer and improves the accuracy of the answer by excluding the options that do not meet the requirements of the topic. In order to find the "first knowledge point", that is, the basis for excluding the first option, the exclusion method must have two characteristics: one is the most accurate judgment, and the other is the most valuable. After determining this knowledge point, you can rule out more options.
Analogy applies to some multiple-choice questions. According to reasonable inference, quickly exclude some options, or infer unknown situations according to known situations, and quickly determine the answer.
I. Classification
1. From the description object: the description of things and the description of things.
2. From the linguistic features of expository writing: simple expository writing and vivid expository writing.
Second, the order of interpretation.
Chronological order, spatial order, logical order.
Specific scores of logical order: subject-time, cause-result, phenomenon-essence, feature-use, general-individual, generalization-concrete, whole-part.
Typical question: What is the order of interpretation in this article? What's the role?
Standardized answer format: In this article, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (The first blank should be filled with the specific order of description, and the second blank should be filled with the specific name or description of the thing. If it is a rational exposition, but it cannot be accurately expressed, it can be expressed in vague language such as "rationality" and "science". )
Third, the method of explanation.
1, the common interpretation methods are: example, classification, definition, imitation, explanation, analogy, numbers, charts and quotations.
2, the role of common methods:
1. Example: Explain the characteristics/reasons of things by giving specific examples, making the explanation more specific and convincing.
(2) Classification: Explain the characteristics/reasons of things in different categories to make the explanation more organized.
③ Comparison: Compare the differences between _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ and _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
(4) Interpretation: Explain the characteristics/reasons of things in detail to make the explanation easier to understand.
⑤. For example: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ and so on.
6. Imitation: Give a vivid description of the characteristics/events of things, so as to make the explanation more specific.
⑦ Definition: To reveal the object/science in concise and scientific language, so as to reveal the characteristics/science of things more scientifically, essentially and generally.
⑧ Numbering: Use specific data to explain the characteristics/facts of things, so as to make the explanation more accurate and convincing.
⑨ Charting: Explain the characteristics/events of things by means of charts to make the explanation more concise and intuitive.
⑩ Quotation: Quotation has the following forms-
First, cite specific cases; (The function is the same as the example)
B, citing specific data; (Functions in the same column)
C. quote famous sayings, aphorisms and proverbs; The function is to make the explanation more convincing.
D, citing myths and legends, news reports, riddles, anecdotes, etc. The function is to enhance the interest of the explanation.
(The reference description is at the beginning of the article, which also leads to the description object. )
Fourthly, the language analysis of expository writing.
1, the analysis of the whole language is generally from two angles: a, accuracy; B, vivid or concise.
This is also the characteristic of general expository writing. B is from the perspective of different language styles. To comment on the language features of the whole article, we must combine the specific content of the article, for example, we can choose a sentence as an example.
The standard answer format is as follows: This article fully embodies the accurate/vivid/concise characteristics of Chinese, such as the sentence "……", which accurately/vividly/concisely explains the characteristics/facts of things. There are many other examples like this.
2. Comments on specific articles/sentences/words
The function of the article/sentence is basically the same as above.
The function of words has the following exam forms:
A, what is the function of adding words? B, can you change the word? C, add some words that can be deleted?
This kind of questions often need to be answered in combination with the characteristics of the accuracy of the interpretation language (sometimes reflecting the vividness of the language) The second question type should also compare the differences in answers between the two. The third question type should also add the expression "after deletion, it does not conform to people's understanding of objective things or to objective facts".
An analysis of explanatory writing of verbs (abbreviation of verb)
1, combined with interpretation method
Normative answer mode is as follows:
The main explanation method adopted in this paper is ... to explain ... (content: the characteristics of things or things) so as to explain ... (function: refer to the previous explanation method to clarify its function)
2, combined with rhetoric.
Normative answer mode is as follows:
This is a vivid explanation article, which uses a lot of rhetorical devices to explain … (content), making the explanation of the article vivid.
3, combined with expressions.
Narration and description make the description more specific; Expressing opinions makes explanations more emotional. Then from this point of view, the writing of the explanatory text is analyzed, and the standard format of the answer is as follows:
In this paper, a variety of expressions are comprehensively used, besides explanation, there are also … (selected from "narration, description, explanation and discussion" according to the content), such as … (specific examples), that is, the use of … (expression) makes the explanation more concrete/emotional.
Sixth, explain the function of paragraphs.
There are three angles to answer this question:
(1), structure, content and function: lead out the following, connect the preceding with the following, and summarize the full text/previous article.
Sometimes at the beginning of the article, it also plays the role of leading out the object of explanation/explaining things.
(2), combined with interpretation.
Explain ... (features or things) by the method of interpretation of ..., so as to explain ... (functions).
Knowledge and skills of expository reading
I. Classification of explanatory texts
1. From the description object: things description text, things description text.
2. From the linguistic features of expository writing: simple expository writing and vivid expository writing.
Second, explain the order.
Chronological order, spatial order, logical order.
Specific analysis of logical order: subject-time, cause-result, phenomenon-essence, feature-use, general-individual, generalization-concrete, whole-part, etc.
Typical question: What is the order of interpretation in this article? What's the role?
Answer format: This paper uses the order of … to explain … to make the explanation more organized.
(The first blank should be filled in with the specific order of description, and the second blank should be filled in with the specific name or description of the thing. If it is a rational exposition, but it cannot be accurately expressed, it can be expressed in vague language such as "rationality" and "science". )
Third, the method and function of interpretation
1, the common interpretation methods are:
Examples, classifications, definitions, descriptions (imitations), explanations, analogies, figures, charts and quotations.
2, the role of common methods:
① Examples: Here, we use examples to explain.
② Classification: The classification here refers to
③ Comparison: This paper compares … with … by means of comparative explanation, highlighting the …
(4) Interpretation: Here, things are specifically explained by means of explanation, which makes the explanation easier to understand.
⑤ Metaphor: Here we compare ... to ... by analogy, which vividly explains. ....
⑥ Description (imitation): The description method of description (imitation) is used here to describe things vividly and make the description more concrete and vivid.
⑦ Definition: Here, we use the explanation method of definition to reveal ... in a concise and scientific language, so as to reveal things more scientifically, essentially and generally.
⑧ Numbers: Here we use numbers to explain things with concrete data, which makes the explanation more accurate and convincing.
⑨ Chart: Here, the chart interpretation method is used to explain things in the form of charts, which makes the explanation more concise and intuitive.
⑩ Quotation: Quotation has the following forms-
First, cite specific cases; (The function is the same as the example)
B, citing specific data; (Functions in the same column)
C. quote famous sayings, aphorisms and proverbs; The function is to make the explanation more convincing.
D, citing myths and legends, news reports, riddles, anecdotes, etc. The function is to enhance the interest of the explanation.
(The reference description is at the beginning of the article, which also leads to the description object. )
Fourthly, the language analysis of expository writing.
1, the analysis of the whole language is generally from two angles: a, accuracy; B, vivid or concise.
This is also the characteristic of general expository writing. B is from the perspective of different language styles. To comment on the language features of the whole article, we must combine the specific content of the article, for example, we can choose a sentence as an example.
The format is as follows: This paper fully embodies the characteristics of accurate/vivid/concise language, such as the sentence "……", and accurately/vividly/concisely explains the characteristics/reasons of things "……".
2. Comments on specific articles/sentences/words
The function of the article/sentence is basically the same as above.
The function of words has the following exam forms:
A, what is the function of adding words?
Answer format: The word "plus sign" means ... It explains ... (content) and reflects the accuracy and rigor of the interpretation language (language).
B, can you change the word?
Answer format: Yes (or No), … is replaced by the word ….
C, add some words that can be deleted?
Answer format: What changes have been made to the meaning (content) after deleting the word "yes or no"? The use of this word reflects the accuracy and rigor of explaining language (language)
Reading and answering skills of explanatory text in senior high school entrance examination
1. Type of expository: thing expository (from the perspective of content, according to the object and purpose of explanation).
The general title of a descriptive article is the object of explanation;
Find concluding sentences at the beginning and end of the explanation.
Because the object of explanation is the thing or thing to be introduced in the article, usually a noun or noun phrase, we can start from two aspects: look at topic 2 and look at the first and last paragraphs. The description of things can only point out what is explained. The explanatory text points out the explanatory content and forms a phrase: Introduction (object plus content).
2. The language of expository writing: simple and vivid expository writing (language expression angle).
3, explanation method: generally answer three words, master several common explanation methods, will analyze the role in the text:
(1) For example, it truly illustrates the xx characteristics of things.
(2) Classification: the organization clearly states the xx characteristics of things. Explain the characteristics/reasons of things in different categories to make the explanation more organized. The content of the explanation should be clear and avoid overlapping.
(3) Enumeration of figures: specifically and accurately explain the xx characteristics of this thing. Make the explanation more convincing.
④ Comparison: xx characteristics (status, influence, etc. ) is highlighted.
⑤ Definition: To reveal the object/science in concise and scientific language, so as to reveal the characteristics/science of things more scientifically, essentially and generally.
6. Metaphor: Metaphor is a metaphor in rhetorical methods. Vividly explain the xx characteristics of this thing and enhance the interest of the article.
⑦. Drawing charts: Let readers see at a glance, and explain the xx characteristics of things very intuitively and vividly.
8. Interpretation: Explain the characteristics/reasons of things in detail to make the explanation easier to understand.
The difference between definition and interpretation is that definition requires completeness, while interpretation does not require completeness. Explain the characteristics/reasons of things in detail to make the explanation easier to understand. It can be reversed.
9. Imitation: A vivid description of the characteristics/facts of things, which makes the explanation more concrete and vivid.
Attending doctor. Citation: It can make the explanation more specific and substantial. Explain the characteristics of things by quoting, so as to enhance persuasiveness, such as quoting ancient poems, proverbs and proverbs. At the beginning of the article, the reference description also plays the role of drawing out the description object.
4. Description sequence: time sequence (program sequence), spatial order and logical sequence. You can be more specific when answering questions.
For example, spatial order (from top to bottom, from inside to outside, always to point, from outside to inside, from front to back, from left to right, from whole to part, and vice versa) and so on. ).
Logical order (first cause, then step by step, phenomenon to essence, cause to effect, effect to cause, main to secondary, simple to profound, individual to general, etc.). Common words indicating causality and logical order, such as "because, therefore", "first and second").
Time series is to explain the development and evolution of things, such as articles introducing working procedures.
Mastering the answer format: This paper uses the explanation order to make the explanation more organized and easy for readers to understand. (The first blank should be filled in with the specific order of description, and the second blank should be filled in with the specific name or description of the thing. If it is a rational exposition, but it cannot be accurately expressed, it can be expressed in vague language such as "rationality" and "science". )
5. Description object: refers to the main person or thing described in the article (generally there is no need to answer the characteristics of people or things).
6. Common forms of explanatory text structure are: "total score" type (or from total score to subtotal, or from small score to subtotal, or total score), parallel type, progressive type, etc. Analyze the structure of the article and master the central sentences and conjunctions, such as "first", "second", "also" and "besides"
7. Central sentence: the position where it appears at the beginning or end, sometimes in a sentence. Judgments are mostly sentences with strong generality. Narrative sentences, descriptive sentences, explanatory sentences and interrogative sentences are generally not suitable for central sentences.
The same is true of other stylistic articles.
④ Summarize the central sentence of the paragraph.
Countermeasures: (1) When thinking about this paragraph, we should not only pay attention to the main ones, but also pay attention to the secondary ones. (2) Words that closely express order, such as "first", "second" and "you", are summarized with reference to the sentence patterns of the central sentences in the upper and lower paragraphs.
8. Description language
What is the purpose of adding words by typing 1? Grasp the accuracy of the explanation and answer the questions.
Countermeasures: A: It accurately/vividly explains the characteristics/reasons of things "……".
Type 2. Can you use another word instead? And explain why.
Countermeasure: A: (1) No.
(2) the meaning or content of the original word.
(3) The meaning or content of the changed words.
(4) What changes have taken place in the meaning after the change, which is not in line with reality.
Type 3. Can restrictive words be deleted?
Countermeasure: A: (1) statement (delete or not delete).
(2) qualitative. Such as: "comparison", "almost" and "equivalent"; Estimate the number of tables such as "about", "possible" and "about".
(3) If it is deleted, what will the original meaning become? It is unrealistic and too absolute.
(4) The word XX embodies the accuracy, thoroughness and scientificity of language.
Type 4, find a word from the article that can reflect the "accurate" characteristics of explanatory language and experience it.
Type 5: reference-what do these conditions, this phenomenon and the same truth refer to in the text?
Countermeasures: generally refers to the sentence before pronouns, find the nearest sentence. Sometimes it should be noted that it may not be the whole sentence, but a part.
9. Common test sites: 1. Understanding of the object and characteristics of interpretation.
2. Identify and understand the interpretation method.
3. Analysis and understanding of the order of interpretation.
4. Analysis of paragraph structure characteristics.
5. Summarize the meaning of the text, levels and paragraphs.
6. Comment on the meanings of keywords and key sentences and their expressive functions.
7. Explain the experience of language accuracy.
Argumentative reading and answering skills
1. Argument (what to prove) Argument should be a complete expression of the author's point of view and a complete, concise and clear sentence in form. Judging from the full text, it will be able to control the full text. The form of expression is often a judgment sentence expressing affirmation or negation, and it is a clear statement sentence.
A. grasp the argument of the article. Only one central argument (commander-in-chief's sub-argument) (1) is clear: there can be n sub-arguments (to supplement and prove the central argument).
⑵ Method ① Find from the location: such as title, beginning, middle and end. ② Analyze the arguments of the article. (It can be used to test whether the expected argument is appropriate) ③ Abstract method (only argument is divided, regardless of the central argument)
B. analyze how the argument is put forward: ① summarize the argument after putting facts and reasoning; ② Cut to the chase and put forward the central argument; (3) Propose topics according to the phenomena existing in life, and summarize the central arguments through analysis and discussion; (4) Narrating the author's experience and summarizing the central argument; ⑤ The author puts forward questions from the story, then gradually analyzes and infers, and finally draws a conclusion and puts forward the central argument.
2. Argument (with what proof) (1) Argument type: (1) Fact argument (summarize after giving examples, and strictly summarize arguments); (2) argument (quote famous words to analyze).
(2) The arguments should be true, reliable and typical (subject matter, country, ancient and modern, etc.). ). (3) Sequential arrangement (reference argument); (4) judging whether the argument can prove the argument; 5] Supplementary arguments (proof arguments).
3, argument (how to prove)
(1) demonstration method (must be four words) (1) illustration (example method) narrative of factual arguments (2) reasoning (introduction method and reasoning method) demonstration of rational arguments.
(3) Comparative argument (itself can also be example argument and reason argument) (4) Metaphor argument Metaphor is a metaphor in expository writing and a metaphor in prose.
⑵ Analysis and demonstration process: ① How the demonstration was put forward; (2) How the argument is proved (which truths and facts are used, and whether there are positive and negative analysis and reasoning); (3) Contact the structure of the full text, whether there is an abstract.
(3) Integrity of argument (A: Make the argument more comprehensive and complete, and avoid misunderstanding)
(4) The function of analysis and argumentation: to prove the argument in this paragraph.
4. The structure of argumentative essay ① General form: ① Introduction (asking questions)-② Theory (analyzing problems)-③ Conclusion (solving problems).
⑵ Type: ① Parallel type ② Total score formula ③ Total score formula ④ Total score formula ⑤ Progressive type.
5. The language of argumentative essay (1) is rigorous (using decorative and restrictive language); (2) Vividness (idioms, the use of various rhetorical devices);
(3) Word order (from the perspective of caring for life logic and context); (4) Sentence order (the use of related words, pay special attention to the progressive relationship).
6, refute the reading of the paper
(1) What is the wrong viewpoint that the author wants to refute? (2) How does the author refute and apply those reasons and arguments; (3) From this, what is the correct view established by the author?
7. Common test sites
(1) Argument test site for argumentative papers: First, distinguish between the issues discussed and the author's views on this issue (that is, distinguish between topics and arguments). Second, pay attention to the position of the argument in the text:
(1) At the beginning of the article, this is the so-called writing.
(2) At the end of the article, it is the so-called induction of the full text, pointing out the topic at the end of the article and revealing the writing method of the center. This kind of writing is often used to express the argument clearly. So, in short, therefore, in short, in the final analysis, and so on.
Third, distinguish between the central argument and the sub-argument: the sub-argument is generally located at the beginning of the paragraph or has iconic words: first, second, third, etc.
Fourth, we should pay attention to the expression form of the argument: sometimes the topic is the central argument. An argumentative essay has only one central argument.
Fifth, refute the inference point through arguments: arguments serve to prove arguments, and analyzing arguments can show what it proves, affirms and supports. This is an argument.
2. Argument test sites: Arguments are the basis of arguments, which are generally factual arguments and rational arguments. 1, use facts as arguments. Examples must be true and reliable, have typical significance, can reveal the essence of things, and have a certain logical connection with the argument. In argumentative writing, the narrative of cited examples should be concise and to the point, highlighting the parts directly related to the argument. When clarifying the argument, we should not only know where the factual argument is used in the text, but also summarize the factual argument. To summarize accurately, we must grasp the essential characteristics of the argument according to the argument and then express it in exact language. 2. The speech used as an argument should be authoritative. When quoting directly, the original text should be recorded, which can not be taken out of context after the fact test; You can't misinterpret your will when quoting indirectly.
(3) Structure and hierarchy of argumentative essays: The structures include parallel structure, contrast structure, hierarchy structure and total score structure.
The basic form of this test center: how does the author prove the argument?
The idea of answering the question is: in order to prove the point of …, the author first uses the argument of … and then analyzes the argument of …, thus proving the point of …. The key is to clarify the level of the proof process.
(4), demonstration method test center
Argumentation method refers to the process and method of proving arguments with arguments, which is the connection between arguments and the logical relationship between arguments. There are four requirements for the senior high school entrance examination:
1. Illustration: It is a way to prove an argument by citing conclusive, sufficient and representative examples. Because "facts speak louder than words", citing hard and typical facts to prove the argument can enhance the persuasiveness of the article.
2. Reasoning and argumentation: it is a method of citing authoritative remarks to prove arguments. Therefore, this method is used properly and has strong argumentation. To analyze the function of citation method, we must first find out whose speech is quoted and what to prove, and then grasp the special function of citation method-authority and power.
3. Metaphorical argument: it is a method to prove the argument through image metaphor. This method can explain the truth in simple terms and is easily accepted by people.
4. Comparative argument: This is a way to prove the argument by comparing the positive and negative facts and reasons. By analyzing and comparing the functions of argumentation methods, comparing the two aspects, the right and wrong are more clear, and the correct view is more acceptable to readers.
ü Thinking of answering questions: (1) Reasoning and argumentation to increase the authority of argumentation. (2) the factual argument, from which angle to prove the argument. (3) Metaphorical argument, or vivid image proof …, or simple explanation proof … (to be determined according to the relationship between ontology and vehicle). (4) Comparative argumentation, comparing the two aspects, making it more clear about right and wrong, and the correct view is more easily accepted by readers.
⑤. Linguistic features of argumentative writing: Analyze the linguistic features of argumentative writing: ①. Analyze the accuracy and rigor of its words from a logical point of view; ② Analyze the generality and conciseness of his narrative from the angle of reasoning; (3) Analyze the bright, vivid and emotional colors of his words from the perspective of rhetoric. Let's explain it from different angles:
A, accurate language: ① accurate use of concepts; (2) Modifiers such as attributive and adverbial are appropriate.
B, language rigor: rigorous judgment and reasoning, meticulous language expression and strong logic.
C, the language is characterized by clear expression, no ambiguity, clear attitude, clear love and hate, proper use of rhetorical methods and special sentence patterns to enhance the vividness and persuasiveness of the language.
D, the conciseness of language generalization is as follows: the facts in the argumentative paper are not detailed and general. The purpose of argumentative writing is to convince people by reasoning. It is not appropriate to describe it in detail. Otherwise, you will usurp the role of master. This point is reflected in general argumentative essays, so I won't give examples to illustrate it.
ü Answer ideas: What is the function of adding words? Thinking: (1) Determine and answer the (superficial) meaning of words in the context; (2) The expression center of words or the function of clarifying opinions (deep, metaphor or extension); This type of question mainly tests the accuracy, thoroughness and vividness of the language. Another example is whether the order of words can be reversed.
ü answer ideas: (1) explain the meaning of words; (2) Make clear the sequence of time or events between words and emphasize their sequence or hierarchical relationship.
6. The referent of pronouns in argumentative essays: This kind of examination questions is more common in reading of various styles. There are basically two situations: first, it needs to be summarized in context. The second is to find out what is quoted in the original text. In this case, the content of the reference generally appears before the pronoun, and can be used to replace the pronoun after being found. Read through the sentences and check whether the meaning of the sentences has changed.
⑦. Open and expand the test site.
This kind of question is generally to examine students' emotional experience or rational thinking after reading the article. When solving problems, we should combine the articles and give full play to the personal feelings gained in reading. Answer: It is equivalent to writing a small argumentative essay with arguments and arguments. Be sure to quote famous sayings or anecdotes from celebrities to prove your point of view or understanding.
8. Test sites for non-critical paper components in argumentative papers.
Reading Rules and Answering Skills of Chinese Explanatory Writing in Junior Middle School (Second Edition) Objective Explanatory Writing is to explain things objectively, or to explain their state, nature, function and characteristics, or to explain the style of things, with the aim of giving people knowledge. Popular science books, knowledge sketches, commentaries and instructions are all explanatory words. According to different standards, explanatory texts can be divided into different categories. Usually, according to the different objects and purposes of explanation, explanatory texts are divided into explanatory texts and explanatory texts. The description of things aims to introduce the physical characteristics of things; The explanatory text aims to explain the reasons and reasons. In expository writing, introducing things and explaining things are often used interchangeably. We can also divide expository writing into simple expository writing and vivid expository writing according to the different characteristics of the language and the different use of expression methods. Vivid exposition is also called literary exposition or scientific sketch. The biggest feature of this kind of exposition is that it is entertaining, both scientific and informative. The expositions of junior middle schools mostly involve modern science and technology and humanistic environment. Through reading expository texts, students' overall perception, understanding and comprehension ability and innovative thinking ability are cultivated. Specifically, we should do the following: ① Understand the object (thing or thing) explained in the article by grasping the order of explanation (time order, spatial order, logical order). (2) By differentiating and interpreting methods (such as giving examples, enumerating data, comparing, defining, explaining, imitating, analogizing, classifying, drawing charts, etc.), we can grasp the relationship between the characteristics of the explanatory object and the things centered on the explanatory object. (3) Through the understanding of the explanation methods, experience the characteristics of the explanation language, and feel the accuracy of the article language, as well as the vivid or plain characteristics under the premise of accuracy. ④ Read narrative, description and discussion by analyzing the function of expression.