Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - What are the arguments of argumentative writing?
What are the arguments of argumentative writing?
Question 1: What are the arguments in the argumentative paper? Argument: it is the material to support the argument and the reason and basis used by the author to prove the argument.

1. factual argument: the role of facts in argumentative writing is very obvious. Analyze the facts, see the truth clearly, and check whether it is consistent with the logic of the article. Representative examples, conclusive data, reliable historical facts, etc.

2. Reasoning and argumentation: Argumentation is always familiar to readers or generally recognized by society. They are the result of abstracting and summarizing a large number of facts.

Stories are generally not allowed, and their persuasiveness is too weak.

in addition

An argument is your point of view.

The basis for supporting your point of view.

Argumentation is the process of proving an argument with arguments.

① Demonstration with examples: cite conclusive, sufficient and representative examples to prove the argument;

(2) Reasoning: use the incisive opinions in the classic works of Marxism-Leninism, famous sayings and aphorisms from domestic and foreign celebrities, and accepted theorem formulas to prove the argument;

③ Comparative argument: compare positive and negative arguments or arguments, and prove arguments in comparison;

(4) Metaphorical argument: use familiar things as metaphors to prove the argument. In addition, in refutation, the refutation methods of "attacking shield with spear" and "reducing to absurdity" are often adopted. It is often used comprehensively in most argumentative papers.

⑤ inductive argument, also called "factual argument". Give concrete examples to demonstrate the method of general conclusion.

⑥ Deductive demonstration, also called "theoretical demonstration", is a method to demonstrate individual cases according to general principles or conclusions. That is, to prove particularity with the argument of universality.

⑦ Analogy argument is a method to deduce examples of similar things from known things, that is, an argument method from special to special.

(8) Causal argument, which proves the argument by analyzing things and revealing the causal relationship between arguments and arguments. Causality argument can be proved by causality, effect and causality.

Citation argument: a kind of "reasoning argument", which takes famous sayings as arguments, quotes classics, analyzes problems and explains reasons. There are two ways to quote: one is to explicitly quote and explain who said the quoted words or their sources, and the other is to implicitly quote, that is, not to explain who said the quoted words or their sources.

Question 2: What did I have for lunch? 10 minutes God knows what you had for lunch, dizzy!

Question 3: What are the three elements of argumentative writing? What are the common sayings? What are the three elements of argument: argument, argument and argument?

Argument is divided into: factual argument and rational argument.

Argumentation methods: example (or fact) argument, truth argument (sometimes called quotation argument), contrast (or positive and negative contrast) argument, metaphor argument.

Argumentation mode: argumentation and refutation (refutable argumentation, argumentation, argumentation)

Three elements of argumentative writing: argument, argument and argumentation.

Demonstration methods: reasoning, example, comparison, quotation and metaphor. 3. Argumentation method: argumentation and refutation. Argumentative essays can be divided into two categories: argumentative essays and argumentative essays. Second, common questions and answering skills. 1, appraisal demonstration method:

Examples (including general examples)-quote famous sayings and make sense with examples-prove opinions with metaphors-compare positive and negative facts or reasons with metaphorical arguments. 2. The role of analysis and demonstration methods:

Sentence pattern: ×× argument method+argument ×× viewpoint+effect.

(1) Illustration: By citing specific examples, the demonstration will be more specific and convincing.

Format: Use examples to demonstrate (summarize examples) to prove (if there is a sub-argument, write the sub-argument it proves, otherwise write the central argument), thus making the argument more specific and convincing. (2) Reasoning argument: prove the argument through reasoning, making the argument more general and profound.

Format: The argument method of reason argument is adopted to demonstrate the viewpoint, thus making the argument more general and profound. 3. Metaphorical argument: use metaphor to prove and make the argument vivid and easy to understand.

Format: By using the method of metaphorical argumentation, the viewpoints are compared and demonstrated, thus making the abstract and profound truth vivid and easy to understand.

④ Comparative argument: The role of comparative argument is outstanding.

Format: Use the method of comparative demonstration to compare and highlight the viewpoints.

⑤ Citation arguments: Citation arguments are complicated and related to the specific cited materials, such as quoting famous sayings, aphorisms, authoritative data, anecdotes of celebrities, jokes and anecdotes. , its role should be analyzed in detail. For example, quoting famous sayings, aphorisms and authoritative data can enhance the persuasiveness and authority of the argument; Citing celebrity anecdotes and anecdotes can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers to read. Format: Use the method of citing arguments to make the argument more convincing by citing proven viewpoints. (or more interesting, to stimulate readers' interest in reading)

Question 4: What is an argumentative essay? Argumentative writing is a style that analyzes and comments on a certain issue or thing and shows one's own views, positions, attitudes, opinions and propositions. Argumentative writing has three elements, namely argument, argument and argument.

Example:

Strict discipline, integrity.

On the eve of the college entrance examination, the Ministry of Education issued the Measures for Handling Violations in National Education Examinations. This method clearly stipulates the possible violations and penalties of candidates and examination staff, which has won the hearts of the people and is widely welcomed by candidates and parents.

In recent years, cheating and irregularities in exams have become more and more serious, which has become a major social hazard. From the daily examinations in universities and primary and secondary schools to the general college entrance examination, from the recruitment examination to various professional and technical titles examinations, from cheating by students in school to cheating by public officials, from cheating by candidates to cheating by invigilators and other staff in partnership and group, from cheating with "cheat sheets" to cheating with modern tools. It should be noted that cheating in exams has caused serious social problems. Some people use all kinds of "fake diplomas" to sneak into the civil service, and some people get "master's" and "doctor's" degrees by taking exams instead. What is particularly worrying is that these phenomena threaten the authority, fairness and seriousness of the national unified education examination, damage the vital interests of the masses and corrupt the social atmosphere. The importance of the college entrance examination to candidates is self-evident. Ten years of cold window, study hard every day, just to get a good grade and a good university. Someone played normally on the spot and got a high score; It is normal that some people can't play their level and their grades are not ideal. No matter whether the exam is good or bad, the exam is equal for everyone, and the opportunity to go to college is equal for everyone. Examination is not only a test of one's own achievements, but also a test of fairness. If someone practices fraud and opportunism, it is unfair to others, that is, depriving other candidates of their due rights and stealing others' opportunities to go to college through improper means. This is the biggest unfairness to the candidates.

Cheating not only harms the order of the examination room, but also corrupts social credit. The integrity of a society is composed of various aspects. Honesty and trustworthiness are the basic requirements for people and the necessary ideological and moral qualities for college students. "People can't stand without faith." The more people talk about honesty, the higher the level of social honesty will be. In society, people must abide by certain rules, otherwise individuals will lose their foundation and society will lose its operating rules. Honesty examination is an important content of students' moral norms, and discipline examination is an important part of social honesty. Since this year's college entrance examination, every candidate has signed a letter of commitment for the integrity test, hoping that candidates will keep their promises, abide by rules and discipline, and hand in an honest answer sheet to the society.

To put an end to all kinds of cheating in exams, we should not only strengthen the construction of examination style and discipline, but also strengthen the prevention and investigation of cheating through various means. It is also necessary to regard honesty examination as a systematic project to manage the educational environment, increase the propaganda of honesty, discipline and law-abiding examinations, and create a social fashion of "honesty examination is glorious and cheating is shameful" through the joint efforts and effective supervision of the whole society. The college entrance examination is just around the corner, and more than 7 million candidates have experienced years of study and are about to face the actual test. This is an important moment for candidates to display their talents, and it is also an important moment in life. I sincerely wish every candidate can play normally, get good grades, and make his due contribution to the integrity construction of the whole society with practical actions.

Question 5: What are the arguments of argumentative writing? Argument: it is the material to support the argument and the reason and basis used by the author to prove the argument.

1. factual argument: the role of facts in argumentative writing is very obvious. Analyze the facts, see the truth clearly, and check whether it is logically consistent with the views in the text. Representative examples, conclusive data, reliable historical facts, etc.

2. Reasoning and argumentation: Argumentation is always familiar to readers or generally recognized by society. They are the result of abstracting and summarizing a large number of facts.