My opinion is that although the double reduction and restriction of game time is aimed at minors, the target group is not only minors, but also adults. Combined with the recent policy, I feel that it is to reduce everyone's pressure from all aspects and increase parents' time with their children.

First of all, the author of this paper is a minor in the compulsory education stage, mainly aiming at the policy of double reduction. Don't say that minors' psychological development is immature and prone to deviation. We have memorized this kind of thing from the first day and know it better than anyone else. This paper only pays attention to things, does not add any emotional color, does not consider the influence of various social factors, only pays attention to the results, and writes my opinion from the perspective of students!

I think it is also problematic to prohibit studying in advance. Isn't this a waste of talent? Some students are naturally smart, and it is reasonable to learn more and be taken care of by others. Of course, I'm not such a person, and I don't know much about it. However, there is an idiom called "stupid birds fly first", and everyone must know it. Just because most people are not geniuses, they are ordinary people and need to study outside in advance. Going back to school to study again is equivalent to consolidating. It can also be understood that attending remedial classes outside is a preview, and studying at school is relatively easy. This is a personal experience.

Here, I just express my dissatisfaction. I am definitely not saying that the "double health" policy is useless. This policy has also done well in some aspects. For example, it is particularly humanized to require schools to offer after-school counseling, and emphasizing quality education can also play a very important role in improving the quality of young people.

Finally, once again, all the opinions here are based on the actual situation. This policy is aimed at the crowd, mainly our students who receive compulsory education, without any emotional color and without considering any social factors! If you can't even express your views on the crowd, is it still useful to make policies? The policy needs to be revised according to the actual situation, as everyone who has studied politics knows. My opinion does not represent most people. If you have your own ideas, please send them to the comment area for discussion!