First of all, as a scientist, a man can download dating software? It's just that I downloaded dating software and chatted with the hostess every day. Is this really reasonable for a young scientist? Second, the man is 27 years old and has won seven or eight Nobel Prizes. Besides, in real life, which scientist hasn't won one or two Nobel Prizes in his 40 s and 50 s, and it's no problem for the screenwriter to make the man fierce, so he can't live like this? It's true. It is too late.
Third, in reality, when the male and female hosts meet for the first time, the female host's thesis is patched together, and the defense tutor looks appreciative. The man suddenly appeared in the defense classroom and began to find fault. After the male host picked up the fault, the defense tutor began to change, saying that the female host's thesis was not good. The plot set by the screenwriter here is really confusing. Why can a student suddenly comment loudly on the defense work? Why can't the tutor present see the quality of the paper when he is 50 or 60 years old? Finally, men always use scientific research resources to create conditions for falling in love with women, which is simply discrediting scientists. The screenwriter wrote this play just to write a sweet pet. As a scientist, this man did nothing!
For this drama, the low score is because the plot written by the screenwriter is too floating. She made everything up and needed a scientific research part with real ingredients. I need to have a snack and check the information. The scientists presented in this play really don't care about anything except falling in love. Why don't we change their names and call them When Love Meets a Man?