Argumentative writing
Argumentative writing, also called argumentative writing, is a style of analyzing things, discussing things, expressing opinions and putting forward opinions. By presenting facts, reasoning, distinguishing right from wrong and giving examples, the author can determine whether a viewpoint is right or wrong, and establish or deny a proposition. Argumentative writing has the characteristics of clear viewpoints, sufficient arguments, concise language, reasonable argumentation and strict logic.
Using vivid narration to indirectly express the author's thoughts and feelings is different from narrative writing, which focuses on introducing or explaining the shape, nature, causes and functions of things, and is also different from explanatory writing. In a word, argumentative writing is an article that convinces people with reasoning, while narrative writing and expository writing are articles that move people with things and teach people with knowledge.
Knowledge expansion:
The so-called story-based beginning is a way to tell a fascinating little story at the beginning, express the plot clearly with narrative language, and then lead to the argument or topic of the article from this story. Starting with a story not only enriches the content of the article, but also naturally leads to opinions and stimulates the reading interest of the marking teacher.
Hierarchical structure, also known as progressive structure and hierarchical structure, is a structural model that goes from shallow to deep, step by step and excavates vertically according to logical relations.
The so-called example method is also called parallelism argument method. It is to list a group of similar arguments in parallel sentences, and then summarize and analyze them. By using examples, a large number of examples can be listed in fewer words, making them comprehensive and sufficient. In addition, due to the use of parallelism, the momentum of the article, the strength of arguments, the expressive force and appeal of language are greatly enhanced.
The so-called hypothetical analysis is also called hypothetical argument. It is to make assumptions from the opposite side in view of the above-mentioned examples, and then draw conclusions contrary to the facts, thus effectively demonstrating the central argument. Using hypothesis analysis, case and hypothesis analysis can be clearly separated, that is, first describe and then deny hypothesis; Sometimes it can also take the form of narration and discussion.