You may think, why do you want to talk about this? The reason is simple, the key lies in the word "total" ... which means there will always be benefits, not just benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate that reading is beneficial to opening books rather than harmless. Don't be entangled in this by the opposition, or you will lose. You will understand the reason after reading it. )
First of all, it is well known that it is good for good books. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate whether the so-called bad books have some advantages of their own. As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, it is big enough to make people fully realize, repent, move towards the bright road and succeed; Little ones should learn several writing methods, a few words and even know a few words. These are the benefits of reading, which is undeniable. So you can introduce a few points to demonstrate that bad books also have some benefits:
First, as long as it is called a bad book, it will definitely affect people's character and lead people astray. But please think about it, what if those bad books can't produce a certain * * * sound with readers and can't let people go deep into them? If the structure and layout, expression, conception and description, language and writing of this book are plain,
Even the general "running account" composition is not as good as it is, how can it produce a * * * sound with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad the book is, at least you can learn some writing methods in the so-called bad book, and at worst you can know a few words. Can you say it's useless?
Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book is judged according to whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In other words, bad books also have certain benefits.
Thirdly, Laozi in ancient China had a view that everything has two sides. Since bad books are harmful, they must have their advantages.
Fourth, maybe you want to say, "Suppose there is a bad book, the content is unsightly, the layout of the article is completely wrong, and it is full of wrong sentences and typos …" until you can't find an advantage. But have you ever thought that even if there is such a book, can anyone understand it? Will you go and see it? ~ ~ ~ Since I won't go to see it, I don't even have the premise of "opening the book". How to talk about whether opening books is beneficial or harmful?
Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness and crime because of reading, what can this show? It can only show that the reader's own mentality is not correct. That's a matter of mentality, and you can't blame the book. Can anyone blame a knife for killing people with a knife?
Therefore, as long as you study, no matter how big or small, it is beneficial. Therefore, it can be inferred that "opening books is beneficial" will certainly be established.
As for "opening a book is not necessarily beneficial", it is a neutral word, half of which is right, but the other half-opening a book is not beneficial, so there is a problem: harmless. Just like a car on the road, it won't fly into the blue sky like an airplane. Can you say it's digging? Gorky said: "Books are the ladder of human progress." Reading more books will increase your knowledge. Isn't Edison an example? He read a lot of books, got inspiration from them and did a lot of practice before he invented the electric light.
Bacon, a world famous person, said: "History lessons make people wise, poetry makes them wise, mathematics makes them careful, natural history makes them profound, and the study of ethics makes them solemn." Many of these meanings can be summed up in one sentence: opening books is beneficial. If we don't read more books, where do we come from?
So much knowledge? Without knowledge, how can you tell people who is right and who is wrong?
The ancients said, "Opening books is beneficial." Indeed, reading widely can make people knowledgeable, eloquent and respected.
Du Fu, an ancient poet, famously said, "Reading is like breaking thousands of volumes, and writing is like a god." It is undeniable that Du Fu exhibited it.
I have read countless books. Although many books have been turned over and torn by him, the knowledge in them has been deeply imprinted in his mind. He wrote articles and poems, and a string of good words and sentences flowed down from the pen tip, and one excellent work was circulated.
Throughout the ages, it has been told by people. It is because of reading that they became famous and made great achievements. Confucius read thousands of books and edited poems, books and Analects of Confucius. Sima Qian read thousands of books and wrote historical records. Li Bai read thousands of books and wrote hundreds of poems about fighting wine; Lu Xun and Guo Moruo read thousands of books and became masters of modern literature in China ... Gorky put it well: "Books are the ladder of human progress." It has become an ironclad fact that reading more books increases knowledge and makes people smart. Many of these meanings can be summed up in one sentence: opening books is beneficial. If we don't study, where can we get knowledge? What's more, there are countless famous sayings about the benefits of reading. Let's talk about it Can't the experience summed up by so many celebrities and great men fully explain that "opening books is beneficial"?
Books are the nourishment of human beings and the source of human knowledge. Just as a civilized country has lost its book culture, a once prosperous country will also face the threat of extinction. Therefore, it is beneficial to open the book. /Liu Xiang once said in the Han Dynasty: "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools." Since books are medicine, we should treat diseases. In fact, you don't have to read carefully when you study. Just browsing, many a mickle makes a mickle. Over time, there will naturally be a treasure house of knowledge in your mind. Think about it. Isn't this the advantage of opening books?